Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest) header
Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest) profile picture

News about the latest empirical studies concerning Google Scholar, other academic search engines, scientific discovery/analytics platforms, and social networks

Granada (Spain)
Joined May 2014
Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)Photo by Not just Google Scholar's Digest (@GScholarDigest)
Comparison of coverage in Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI. Now peer-reviewed and available at Scientometrics doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-0… open access version available at arxiv.org/abs/2004.14329
6
38
6
79
Estamos de acuerdo, Google Scholar no evalúa la calidad, solo presenta los datos que recopila automáticamente para que tú tomes una decisión. Como dices, hay que molestarse en ir más allá del indicador y ver lo que hay detrás
Replying to @MiguelZapataRos
Vean las listas con resultados inverosímiles. Se mezclan revistas de calidad con otras que, si se molestan en ver artículos, son en su mayoría self report studies, revisiones, hagiografías y exégesis. Google Scholar no evalúa la calidad, sólo aspectos formales Son autómatas 2/3
3
4
Please consider taking part in this survey
Do you work in Higher Education, and use online databases such as Google Scholar to search for literature? I would like to hear from you! Please complete a short (15 mins) survey: cambridge.eu.qualtrics.com/j… - pls RT and share. Thanks!
4
7
Henk F. Moed has died. Henk was an excellent scientist and a better person
1
12
8
32
Henk F. Moed, a fruitful scientific life dedicated to the study of research assessment, scientometrics, informetrics and research policy
1
2
10
A Google Scholar trick - combining citations from multiple items and filtering by keyword in a single search! by @aarontay musingsaboutlibrarianship.bl…
Microsoft Academic is closing down at the end of this year. Read about the replacement being developed by @OurResearch_org
7
6
ResearchGate and Google Scholar: How much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why? arxiv.org/abs/2105.13602 by @vivekks12 @satyaswarup98 et al.
Goodbye, Microsoft Academic – Hello open research infrastructure?blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci…
6
9
Beware of references generated by Google Scholar, chances are you'll have to manually fix them (which defeats their purpose). Even if they don't contain other errors, there are two big limitations: 1) no DOIs, and 2) truncated author lists (when > 10) even in BibTeX/RIS formats!
📢 #GoogleScholar #citations #wrong!? We're currently exploring this. You can help 👇 1) Check your citations in #GS. If you find errors (ie author position/order/spelling; mostly occur in "Harvard" & "Vancouver" style), write us or into the comments 2) Re-twt this call Thanks!
2
11
9
Our suggestion: get the reference metadata from the source (publisher website) or from a curated data source: CrossRef, PubMed, Dimensions, Web of Science, Scopus... then use a reference manager like @zotero to generate references in your preferred format
Why open alone is not enough - Microsoft Academic discontinued & Semantic Scholar withdraws hosting of "Open access" papers musingsaboutlibrarianship.bl…
1
8
12
The declared goal is to help authors track the mandates they need to fulfil -> Wouldn't it make more sense then to include as part of a private dashboard only accessible to the owner of the profile?
1
1
First reactions to the new feature in Google Scholar profiles. More miss than hit?
Before you all get excited about the Google Scholar "public access" tab, I am here to tell you it is terrible and flawed
1
7
8
Yep. Google Scholar is publicly shaming authors with flawed data and no way for authors to fix except to comply ... even when they aren't under mandate or legally cannot load to Gdrive. If you think this is a good move, be prepared to defend when GS releases its PA-index next.
1
1
Notice how this converts GS into a paper hosting platform (powered by Google Drive), similar to ResearchGate, because authors will have the option to remove articles
Replying to @GScholarDigest
Public PDFs uploaded to Google Drive will also be indexed in Google Scholar and will therefore appear in author profiles😲
4
4
Surprising new feature on Google Scholar author profiles: tracking adherence to open/public access mandates at the author level scholar.googleblog.com/2021/… watch this space as we unbundle this new development
2
58
19
80
"The Public Access section of a Google Scholar profile contains the articles that are expected to be publicly available based on funding agency mandates." "The Google Scholar indexing system automatically extracts funding information from the acknowledgement sections of articles"
2
4
7
Had not seen this before
Fun fact for those subscribed to Google scholar updates - it flags “special” landmark citations! (Also, bonus: this looks like a cool paper)
3
1
Interesting contribution from @PeterKraker on the crisis of discoverability of scholarly content. While the general-purpose Google search engine is increasingly contextualising content, Google Scholar results pages have barely evolved since its launch doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2021…
3
6