Posting Daily Clips of SNEAKO fanpage and not impersonating LLLS (https://nitter.gq/t.co/K9TDNxW9BQ)
Joined February 2026
- Tweets313
- Following103
- Followers551
- Likes1.1K
A belarusian muslim revert explains SNEAKO why the US constitution goes against the orders of Islam.
SNEAKO asks CHRISTIANS like DJ Akademiks who are siding with Israel one question:
'If Jesus were to be born today, what nationality would he be?"
"Jesus 100% would be a Palestinian."
SNEAKO goes on a rant about Steiny for sitting down with DJ Akademiks right after their beef, accusing him of farming it.
SNEAKO's chat asks THE ORTHODOX MUSLIM what to do if someone asks whether you've COMMITTED a SIN. The Orthodox Muslim says you shouldn't EXPOSE it, not even to your PARENTS.
'You're not supposed to expose your sins. If your parents ask you if you've sinned, no, you shouldn't expose yourself.'
GEEKO retweeted
You鈥檙e getting sued, Islamically.
FORMAL NOTICE FROM SNEAKO鈥橲 LEGAL COUNSEL
As @Sneako鈥檚 attorney, I can confirm that the image circulating of him allegedly kissing another man is fabricated and digitally manipulated. It is not authentic.
We have identified the original Kick livestream showing @Sneako and @Yeoakx walking and talking. No kissing occurred. We have also identified the individual responsible for obtaining the original screenshot and having it manipulated to falsely depict a kiss.
Significantly, the initial fabricated image retained the Kick livestream logo, making it possible to trace the image to its original source and verify the fabrication. Your version conspicuously removes that logo, obscuring a critical means of independently verifying the truth. This raises serious questions about the care exercised before publishing this material.
This is not legitimate journalism. It is the dissemination of fabricated imagery presented as fact, with the potential to cause serious reputational harm.
The First Amendment provides substantial protection for journalism, including reporting allegations about public figures. However, it does not provide blanket immunity for publishing defamatory falsehoods with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.
You are hereby placed on express notice that this image is fabricated. Any continued publication, republication, or amplification of the image as authentic, particularly after receiving evidence establishing its falsity, may expose you to legal liability. Our client expressly reserves all rights and remedies.
We demand that you remove the fabricated image, publicly correct the record, and refrain from further presenting this manipulated content as authentic.
In an era when AI-generated fabrications can be created and circulated within minutes, journalists and commentators have a responsibility to exercise reasonable care before spreading material capable of destroying reputations.
Fabricated images are not evidence. Repeating a lie does not make it true. And freedom of the press does not eliminate accountability for actionable defamation.
GEEKO retweeted
FORMAL NOTICE FROM SNEAKO鈥橲 LEGAL COUNSEL
As @Sneako鈥檚 attorney, I can confirm that the image circulating of him allegedly kissing another man is fabricated and digitally manipulated. It is not authentic.
We have identified the original Kick livestream showing @Sneako and @Yeoakx walking and talking. No kissing occurred. We have also identified the individual responsible for obtaining the original screenshot and having it manipulated to falsely depict a kiss.
Significantly, the initial fabricated image retained the Kick livestream logo, making it possible to trace the image to its original source and verify the fabrication. Your version conspicuously removes that logo, obscuring a critical means of independently verifying the truth. This raises serious questions about the care exercised before publishing this material.
This is not legitimate journalism. It is the dissemination of fabricated imagery presented as fact, with the potential to cause serious reputational harm.
The First Amendment provides substantial protection for journalism, including reporting allegations about public figures. However, it does not provide blanket immunity for publishing defamatory falsehoods with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.
You are hereby placed on express notice that this image is fabricated. Any continued publication, republication, or amplification of the image as authentic, particularly after receiving evidence establishing its falsity, may expose you to legal liability. Our client expressly reserves all rights and remedies.
We demand that you remove the fabricated image, publicly correct the record, and refrain from further presenting this manipulated content as authentic.
In an era when AI-generated fabrications can be created and circulated within minutes, journalists and commentators have a responsibility to exercise reasonable care before spreading material capable of destroying reputations.
Fabricated images are not evidence. Repeating a lie does not make it true. And freedom of the press does not eliminate accountability for actionable defamation.