Hoogie

New badge who dis 👀 Excited to announce that I'll be repping @surgence_io from now on X 😌 I'm very happy with this because I have a long history with Surgence: 🏗️ I've been an elite builder in their server for 2+ years 💼 Worked with them for one of their client GTM campaigns 📜 Participated in many many content campaigns for them 🤝 Executed full content campaigns for them Always been a great experience with solid, seasoned, legitimate builders. Let's get this new strategic creator partnership rolling! SUGMI

If you say, verify the agent's work, it sounds straightforward until the job is to actually make a good video Code can pass a test suite. Creative work needs a brief and some judgment. The AACP whitepaper from @termix_ai makes room for that distinction: program based checks, structured rubrics and combinations of both, with TEE and zkVM verification approaches. The bit I care about most is defining the checks before the work starts. A proof can show that a check ran correctly. Whether you chose a useful check is still your problem. Anyone who's managed a vague brief knows how expensive that gets tbh

What would make you hire an AI agent a second time? For me: it delivered what I asked for, on time, without needing constant corrections. That should matter when the next buyer finds it too. @termix_ai connects agent identity with an onchain record of work and reputation. The .agent handle gives it an identity, while its history gives buyers something to evaluate. I'd still check whether its experience fits my job. A strong research record doesn't automatically make it a good coding agent. But having a record to inspect is a useful starting point

If you're exploring @termix_ai, start with a boring job Something you can actually judge.. For example: research these 5 protocols. Include sources, dates and a comparison table Clear scope. Clear output. Clear deadline. On agent . family, you can publish a request and review provider offers, or buy an existing service listing. Accepted offers move into an onchain order funded through escrow. I'd start small and follow the whole process through delivery and settlement. You learn a lot more from one completed job than from browsing 50 agent profiles 🤝

Look, an AI agent can produce great work and still make zero money Someone needs to find it, understand what they're buying, agree on a price and trust the delivery That's the part @termix_ai is building around. TermiX is commerce and settlement infrastructure for AI agents. AACP is the protocol underneath it, and agent . family is the marketplace built on top Jobs, services, delivery verification, reputation and payment all belong in that conversation My question for the agent economy is pretty simple: Would someone pay this agent to do the same job again next week?

Your favorite KOL: look how hard I'm growing on instagram now as well! Also your fav KOL: follow me on instagram and I'll pay you $$ 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

Check out my week on @trylimitless fam! Happy weekend ❤️

Torino vs Monza tonight! Last week I passed on Torino. Now I'm reconsidering. One of my favourite things about analysing markets on @trylimitless @lmts_football is that you can change your opinion when the evidence changes. And Torino are a perfect example. On Monday, Torino were priced at 41.5C away against Parma. I passed. They won 3-0. Now they're facing Monza at home. 📊 Market prices: 🔴 Torino: 46.6C / 2.15x 🤝 Draw: 30.4C / 3.29x ⚪ Monza: 29.4C / 3.40x Here's what's changed. Torino have collected 10 points from their last 5 Serie A matches. They've won consecutive games against Udinese and Parma. And their attack is finally producing. Giovanni Simeone scored twice against Parma, while Che Adams added another. But Monza aren't arriving in bad form either. They just demolished Cagliari 4-0. Gustavo Varela has scored 6 goals in his first 6 league matches. So this isn't a straightforward home win. However, Monza have a significant weakness. They've collected just 11 points from their last 23 Serie A away matches. And Torino have historically been a difficult opponent for them. At 46.6C, Torino need to win more than 46.6% of the time to justify the entry before fees. An independent statistical model puts their winning probability closer to 43%. That makes the current price difficult to justify, despite the favourable matchup. 🎯 My position: PASS on Torino YES @ 46.6C. I like Torino to win, but liking the winner isn't enough. I'd reconsider if their price dropped toward 40C without negative team news. And this is exactly what I'm trying to improve with these weekly analyses. You can be bullish on a team and still bearish on the price.

Rainy stormy morning ⛈️ Means gym empty Ik not skipping though 💪 Happy Friday 🙏

Let's gooo Ajax tonight! Ajax vs Atalanta. Is the market underestimating the Italians? This is one of the more interesting European matchups on @trylimitless @lmts_football today. 📊 Market prices: 🔴 Ajax: 45.5C / 2.20x 🤝 Draw: 27.3C / 3.66x 🔵 Atalanta: 33.4C / 2.99x Ajax are favourites at home. But I'm not convinced their recent performances justify that confidence. They lost 2-1 to Hajduk Split in their European opener. And despite bouncing back with a 5-2 victory over Groningen, their defensive problems haven't disappeared. Ajax have failed to keep a clean sheet in their last 7 competitive matches. Atalanta aren't exactly flying either. They've lost 4 of their last 5 Serie A matches, including a 3-2 defeat against AC Milan. But they opened their European campaign with a convincing 3-1 victory over Pafos. And there's another important factor. Ajax will be without Daley Blind and Steven Berghuis, who have only just returned to training. Atalanta have injury concerns of their own, particularly in defence. So we're looking at two teams capable of scoring, but neither looks particularly reliable defensively. Here's where the price becomes interesting. Atalanta YES costs 33.4C. That means we need them to win more than 33.4% of the time to justify buying, before fees. Given Ajax's defensive struggles and Atalanta's attacking quality, I think that's a reasonable possibility. 🎯 My position: Atalanta YES @ 33.4C is my speculative value lean. Not a high confidence BUY. Atalanta's poor domestic form is a genuine concern, and I'd want to see their confirmed lineup. But I'm more interested in their price than Ajax at 45.5C. The better-known home team isn't always the better-priced team.

Check out my week so far on @trylimitless 👇

BIG GAME TONIGHT! PSG vs Barcelona Two European heavyweights, but is Barcelona being underestimated? This is easily one of the most interesting Champions League markets on @trylimitless tomorrow. 📊 Market snapshot: 🔵 PSG: 40C / 2.50x 🤝 Draw: 22.2C / 4.50x 🔴 Barcelona: 41C / 2.44x The market sees this as almost a coin flip between two attacking powerhouses. And the form explains why. PSG have won their opening two Champions League matches, including a 4-2 victory away at Manchester City. Barcelona have also started with two wins, scoring nine goals against Feyenoord and Galatasaray. But here's where things get interesting. Both teams have significant defensive absences. PSG will be without Nuno Mendes after his thigh injury. Barcelona are missing Jules Koundé and Eric García. That creates vulnerabilities on both sides, particularly against opponents with this much attacking quality. And Barcelona have Lamine Yamal, who's been producing exceptional numbers this season. But PSG have home advantage, attacking depth and the ability to punish defensive mistakes. So what does that mean for the market? At 41C, Barcelona need to win more than 41% of the time to justify a YES entry before fees. I can see a route to victory for both teams. But I'm not confident enough that Barcelona's true probability is above the market price. 🎯 My position: PASS at these prices. Barcelona YES becomes more interesting if the price drops below 38C without a negative change in team news. For now, this looks like a genuinely competitive market rather than an obvious mispricing. Sometimes the best analysis leads to no trade @trylimitless @lmts_football

Parma vs Torino tonight! Is the market giving Torino too much credit? One of the more interesting Serie A markets on @trylimitless today. 📊 Current snapshot: 🟡 Parma: 31.4C / 3.18x 🤝 Draw: 33.4C / 2.99x 🔴 Torino: 41.5C / 2.41x Torino are the favourites, but there's something worth questioning here. Last week, they beat Udinese 2-1. A useful result, especially after a difficult start to the season. But one victory doesn't suddenly erase the problems that came before it. Parma have home advantage, and the market is pricing this as a fairly competitive matchup. What stands out to me is the draw. At 33.4C, it's actually priced higher than a Parma victory. That's a significant amount of probability assigned to neither team winning. And it tells you how little separation the market sees between these sides. 🎯 My position: PASS on Torino YES @ 41.5C. I don't see enough evidence to justify backing Torino as the away favourite. Parma at 31.4C is worth monitoring, but I want a stronger case before calling it value. Last week taught me something important. An attractive underdog price isn't an edge unless you can explain why the market is wrong. I'm applying that lesson here fam @trylimitless @lmts_football

Read about my week on @trylimitless here fam

It's hilarious to see how many people still think all the online casino clips of massive hits are real Fake balances, fake wins, all just to reel you in and make a deposit, it's literally their business model Posters even have badges and reflinks in those posts lmao smh

Ok let's have a look at Burnley vs Wolves for tonight The market favours Wolves, but is it overlooking Burnley's momentum? Friday's Championship matchup has caught my attention on @trylimitless @lmts_football 📊 Market prices: 🔴 Burnley: 35C / 2.86x 🤝 Draw: 29C / 3.45x 🐺 Wolves: 41.5C / 2.41x At first glance, Wolves deserve to be favourites. They're 10th in the Championship with 14 points, while Burnley sit 21st with just 8. But look at what happened last weekend. Burnley demolished Watford 4-0 away from home. Wolves lost 1-0 to Middlesbrough, their second consecutive league defeat. And there's another interesting detail. Burnley are unbeaten in their last 3 league matches. They've also drawn 3 of their 4 home league games. Wolves have won twice away this season, so they're clearly capable of getting a result at Turf Moor. But with their recent form dropping off, I'm not convinced they should command a 41.5C price. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have also been competitive: Burnley 1-1 Wolves Wolves 2-3 Burnley Wolves 2-0 Burnley This looks closer than the league table suggests. 🎯 My position: Burnley YES @ 35C is my value lean. I'm not ignoring Wolves' stronger overall season. But Burnley's improving form, home advantage and recent attacking performance make 35C worth considering. I'd want to confirm the lineups before entering, and I wouldn't chase a significantly higher price. Sometimes the opportunity isn't backing the better team. It's backing the team the market might be underestimating

🇫🇷 Marseille vs Olympiacos tonight! Are we paying too much for the home favourite? Current @trylimitless @lmts_football prices: 🇫🇷 Marseille: 43C / 2.33x 🤝 Draw: 29C / 3.45x 🇬🇷 Olympiacos: 34C / 2.94x Now look at the recent results. Marseille have won just 1 of their last 6 competitive matches. That includes a 4-1 defeat to Beşiktaş in their Europa League opener. Olympiacos, meanwhile, have won 4 of their last 6. They beat Jagiellonia 2-1 in Europe and followed that with a 1-0 victory over Panathinaikos. There's also a squad issue for Marseille. Pierre Emile Hojbjerg and Derek Cornelius are unavailable, leaving them without two important options. Of course, playing at the Velodrome is a significant advantage. And Marseille finally ended their losing streak with a 2-0 win over Troyes. But does that justify pricing them at 43C against a more in-form Olympiacos side? I'm not convinced. 🎯 My position: PASS on Marseille YES @ 43C. Olympiacos at 34C is the side I'd investigate, but I'm not calling it a BUY without a clearer probability advantage. A bigger club name doesn't automatically deserve a bigger probability!

Did you capitalize on CPI fam? @trylimitless

Everyone keeps talking about AI agents trading crypto. But I think one of the biggest opportunities for AI is actually prediction market resolution. Think about it. Anyone can create a market. That's the easy part. But who decides what actually happened? A committee? Token holders? Some centralized team? That's where things get complicated. @xomarket is taking a different approach with MODRA, its AI Market Engine. Multiple AI agents evaluate outcomes against predefined sources to reach consensus. And that's what makes the bigger vision interesting. Millions of niche prediction markets are only possible if you can resolve them at scale. AI might be the missing piece.

Checkout how the start of my week went on @trylimitless 👇

Woahh Atletico Madrid vs Manchester United tonight! I think the market has this one right, but there's still an interesting angle. Current @trylimitless @lmts_football prices: 🔴 Atletico: 51C / 1.96x 🤝 Draw: 25C / 4.00x 🔵 Manchester United: 26C / 3.85x Atletico have found their rhythm. Four consecutive wins across competitions, including victories over Real Madrid and Osasuna. Manchester United are having a very different start to the season. Just one win in their last five matches, and their Premier League performances have been inconsistent. Now they travel to Madrid. Atlético's home advantage is significant, especially in European competition. But the market already knows that. 51C means we're paying for Atletico to win more than half the time. And against a Manchester United side that still has attacking quality through Bruno Fernandes, Mbeumo and Cunha, that's not an insignificant price. The other complication is squad availability. Atlético have concerns around Sørloth and Barrios, while United have several defensive absences to manage. 🎯 My position: Atletico YES @ 51C is a lean, not an automatic BUY. I'd want the confirmed lineups before entering. The football argument favours Atletico. The price argument is closer. And that's why I don't blindly back the team I expect to win. A good prediction and a good trade aren't always the same thing.