PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa) profile picture

Grupo multidisciplinar convencido del trabajo en EQUIPO [email protected]

Oviedo, Spain
Joined February 2020
Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)Photo by PROA_HUCA-HMN (@HucaProa)
Routine antipseudomonal therapy may be unnecessary in high-risk FN patients! Challenging the Dogma: Can Rectal Colonization Status Guide Narrow-Spectrum Empiric Antibiotic Therapy in Febrile Neutropenia? 🆕💥🔴Retrospective study Among high-risk neutropenic patients, negative rectal swab predicted very low risk of PA or MDR-GNB BSI, challenging routine empiric antipseudomonal coverage #IDXposts sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
37
93
5,035
🩸 ¿Y si restringijimos los hemocultivos a 1 sola pareja de frascos (ae+ana)? 2.987 episodios antes de la restricción vs 1.076 con una sola pareja ⬇️Incidencia bacteriemia : 5,84 vs 4,10/1.000 pacientes-día ⬇️Contaminaciones: 39% vs 31% ⬇️Aclaramiento microbiológico: 86% vs 70%
27
71
2,975
🔥CDC just released the 2026 update to the Antimicrobial Resistance Threats Report (AR Threats Report)🔥 The 2026 update estimates that 19 bacteria and fungi result in 9.7 million infections & 50,800 deaths in the United States each year #IDXposts arpsp.cdc.gov/artr?ACSTracki…
4
105
3
220
31,241
El mejor "antibiótico" es el control del foco.
What is the optimal duration of antibiotics after ERCP decompression for cholangitis? The #UEGWeek 2026 top abstract prize goes to Anouk Overdevest for her work on the COBRA trial, which shows that 1 day of antibiotic is non-inferior to 4-7 day courses 👏🏆
1
1
109
🚨The MBL tide is rising. Even the Trojan horse has its Achilles’ heel. 🆕💥🟢US surveillance of 80,927 Enterobacterales collected from 103 US medical centres (2016–2024): Helio Sader et Al. • 194 (0.24%) were NS to CZA or MVB • 115 (0.14%) were NS to both CZA + MVB • 832 (1.0%) were carbapenem-resistant ⚠️ 36.1% (73/202) of CRE collected in 2023–24 were MBL producers, with NDM predominating. Among isolates NS to CZA and/or MVB, NDM was the most common carbapenemase (114; 58.8%). 🧬 Aztreonam/avibactam: • 98.1% active vs CRE • 98.4% vs MBL producers • 91.9% vs CZA-NS • 94.0% vs MVB-NS Species-level activity: • K. pneumoniae: 98.0% • E. cloacae complex: 100% • E. coli: 87.5% Among ATM/AVI-NS CRE, carbapenemases included NDM-5 (2 E. coli). 🔬 Cefiderocol was active • 78.8% vs CZA-NS • 83.2% vs MVB-NS • 94.7% vs CRE • 82.1% vs MBL producers Among cefiderocol-NS isolates, 71.1% carried a carbapenemase, including NDM-1/NDM-5 in 19 isolates, plus KPC-3/4, KPC-65 + NDM-5, NDM-1 + OXA-232, IMI-4 and VIM-1. 🔄 Cross-resistance was not absolute: • ATM/AVI active vs 92.1% of cefiderocol-NS isolates • Cefiderocol active vs 81.2% of ATM/AVI-NS isolates 🎯 Cefiderocol was less reliable against MBL producers (82.1% susceptible) than ATM/AVI (98.4%). Notably, 71.1% of cefiderocol-NS isolates carried a carbapenemase, including NDM-1/NDM-5. #idxposts academic.oup.com/jac/article…
20
58
4,874
🆕💥🔴Population pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in patients with haematological malignancies and VRE bloodstream infections 🔺1200 mg was the only dose able to achieve PTA>90% for MICs of 4 mg/L when targeting fAUC24h,ss/MIC >27.43, PB 86% 🔺PTA >90% was achievable for MICs ≤1 mg/L with doses ≥10 mg/kg or doses ≥850 mg daily (fAUC24h,ss/MIC>81.87, PB 86%). 🔺No doses achieved PTA >90% for MICs >4 mg/L for either efficacy target. 🔺Protein binding significantly affected PTA for VREfm BSI efficacy targets #idxposts sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
1
20
1
58
12,240
What drives levofloxacin prophylaxis failure in high-risk hematology patients? 🆕💥🟢Prospective observational study of 120 neutropenic episodes examined why levofloxacin prophylaxis fails in high-risk hematology patients: 🔺Profound neutropenia → higher risk of prophylaxis failure (OR 4.17) 🔺fAUC₀–₂₄/MIC ≥80 → lower risk of failure (OR 0.12) 🔺ROC analysis identified fAUC/MIC ≥48.46 as the optimal cutoff 🔺Target non-attainment was strongly associated with levofloxacin-resistant GNB colonization, indicating that PK/PD failure was predominantly MIC driven. 🔺750 mg/day was insufficient to achieve the PK/PD target in a significant proportion of patients 🔑 Levofloxacin prophylaxis failure appears to reflect an interplay between host factors and inadequate PK/PD target attainment, which was largely influenced by levofloxacin-resistant GNB colonization. #idxposts academic.oup.com/jac/article…
2
6
32
3,608
PROA_HUCA-HMN retweeted
#DivulgaciónSEIMC | ¿Son necesarios más hemocultivos de control tras documentar la negativización en la bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus? 🩸🔬 Un estudio reciente, compartido por la Dra. @velascoarribas, que analizó 1.005 episodios de bacteriemia por S. aureus observó que solo el 3,1% de los pacientes presentó una bacteriemia de escape después de haber obtenido hemocultivos negativos a las 48 horas de tratamiento eficaz. Los resultados muestran que los pacientes clínicamente estables, afebriles, sin signos ni síntomas de infección metastásica y con hemocultivos negativos a las 48 horas tienen un riesgo muy bajo de bacteriemia persistente. Estos hallazgos apoyan una utilización más individualizada de los hemocultivos de control, evitando procedimientos innecesarios en pacientes de bajo riesgo. El trabajo aporta evidencia relevante para optimizar el seguimiento microbiológico de una de las infecciones más frecuentes y con mayor impacto clínico en la práctica diaria. Os dejamos el artículo al completo ⬇️⬇️ academic.oup.com/cid/advance…
62
1
139
6,995
🩸¿Una sola venopunción para obtener 2 hemocultivos completos? 1 punción → 4 frascos 📉 HC solitarios: pasaron de 85,9% → 7,2% 📉 Contaminación: de 6,5% → 3,5% Sin reducir la detección de bacteriemias verdaderas. Menos punciones, mejor cumplimiento y mismo rendimiento🧫
1
47
1
130
7,056
Individualizar... Paciente e infección.
The 2026 IDSA AMR Guidance has moved away from recommending universal high-dose meropenem. AMR 2024: 2 g IV q8h (3-h infusion) for all infections except uncomplicated cystitis. AMR 2026: 1–2 g IV q8h over 3h ( if feasible), with 2 g preferred only for selected patients (e.g., obesity, CNS infections, ECMO, or CrCl ≥130 mL/min). A welcome shift toward more individualized dosing, consistent with the message of our editorial: Universal high-dose meropenem for antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative infections: evidence or overreach? ejhp.bmj.com/content/early/2…
2
3
1,856