SOCIAL INNOVATOR/STRATEGIST. FOUNDER/DIRECTOR FRAMEWORKS HOUSING SOCIETY AND COALITION FOR DEMOCRATIC AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY SOCIETY. STUDENT OF LAW🙏❤️
Canada
Joined January 2019
- Tweets39.3K
- Following736
- Followers1.3K
- Likes14.1K
GIVE THIS A LISTEN.
BULLSHIT REFERENDUM ANSWERS BEING EXPLAINED...
youtu.be/3WhzqNDAxtU?si=hS7K…
A young American's perspective on freedom of being a child...
Donald Trump and Republicans are the ones who should feel embarrassed.
But hey, you'd need a conscience.
WATCH:
#DemsUnited #VoteBlue
Definitely.
The money spent was needed elsewhere...
Alberta has spent months and considerable public money on a separation referendum that Premier Danielle Smith had no electoral mandate to pursue.
Albertans endured a costly, divisive exercise that their Premier unilaterally chose to initiate that was not in the public interest or the interest of the country.
All four proposals directed at changing Alberta's constitutional relationship with Ottawa were rejected. Five immigration-related proposals passed, most by narrow margins.
Her government changed the laws along the way to enable the vote. The political debate divided Albertans and created real uncertainty for businesses and investors.
All to arrive at a result that was hardly surprising. Three-quarters of voters chose to remain in Canada.
None of the immigration issues needed a referendum to be debated or addressed through government policy.
If Smith wanted a public mandate for what is her own agenda, she should have called an election and sought one.
BILL 14 ...
👇👇
WHO CHECKS GOVERNMENT POWER?
Alberta’s Bill 14 deserves renewed attention—and a response from Ottawa.
Passed in December 2025, the Justice Statutes Amendment Act removed important safeguards from Alberta’s citizen initiative process, including:
• The requirement that initiative proposals not contravene specified Charter and Aboriginal and treaty rights provisions.
• The Chief Electoral Officer’s power to refer questions to a court.
It also provided for the termination of pending proceedings under that referral process.
These changes did not remove the Constitution. They removed safeguards designed to test proposals against it.
In the separation-reference case, Justice Feasby criticized legislation intended to circumvent an independent electoral officer’s valid court process. That should concern us regardless of how we vote.
I believe Ottawa should pursue disallowance—the exceptional constitutional power to annul a provincial Act. Concerns about provoking a constitutional confrontation deserve consideration. So does the danger of allowing independent safeguards to be steadily weakened.
Avoiding confrontation is not the same as protecting constitutional stability.
Write to Justice Minister Sean Fraser at [email protected]. Ask him to recommend disallowance of Bill 14 and confirm the applicable deadline. The one-year window runs from federal receipt of the authentic Act; the exact date needs confirmation.
Would you accept these changes from a government you oppose?
Please share—and consider sending your own brief, respectful email.
#Alberta #Bill14 #RuleOfLaw
My blood pressure just rose...
👇👇👇👇
The shit show continues. We need total transparency on the voting totals.
1)-the difference between votes cast on question 10 and those cast on questions 1-9 are concerning.
2)- the various electronic files used to collect the counted ballot totals and their final tabulation need to be inspected for mathematical accuracy.
3)-approximately 110,000 data entries need double checked.
Populist break down.
Rinse. Repeat.
NEXT!...
8TH Generation coming up...
👇👇
FLAG LAWS.
@ABDanielleSmith it seems you are discriminating against certain groups of people.
Your separatists flew swastika flags during the convoy, but you had no problem with that. Yet,First Nations flags can be flown INSIDE schools.
These are human rights issues.
We'll be analyzing these.
If we find your actions do not align with the Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms, we will file a motion in the King's Bench.
"Mandatory Flags:
School boards must fly the Canadian flag and the Alberta flag outside school buildings during the school year.
Permitted on Specified Days:
Certain flags—such as the Franco-Albertan flag, municipal/civic flags, and the Royal Union Flag—can only be flown on designated days or specific occasions.
First Nations and Métis Flags:
Treaty flags (First Nations, Métis Settlements General Council, and Métis settlements) can be displayed inside school buildings during official occasions, specific days (such as National Indigenous Peoples Day or Truth and Reconciliation Day), or when tied to approved curriculum.
Restrictions:
Flags used to advance a social, political, or ideological cause (including Pride flags) are restricted or prohibited unless specifically permitted through an exception or written request approved by the Ministry of Education and Childcare.
Various legal experts, civil rights organizations, and advocates have raised the following key arguments:
1. Freedom of Expression as per section 2(b) of the Charter.
The Issue:
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects the right to free expression.
Critics argue that banning specific symbols, such as Pride flags, restricts a school community's right to express solidarity, identity, and shared values.
The Counter-Argument:
Proponents of the policy argue that public school infrastructure belongs to the state, and the government has the authority to maintain political neutrality on government-owned property.
2. Discrimination and Equality as per section 15 of the Charter⁷
• The Issue:
Opponents argue the law disproportionately targets marginalized groups. By requiring ministerial approval for flags advancing "social or ideological causes" while explicitly singling out Pride flags in public discourse, critics argue it creates a hostile or unequal environment for queer youth.
Impact on Safety:
Human rights advocates emphasize that school environments have a legal duty to be safe and inclusive. They argue that removing visible symbols of welcome, like Pride flags, harms the well-being of vulnerable students.
3. Indigenous Rights and Reconciliation
The Issue:
Restricting the display of Treaty, First Nations, and Métis flags to specific "official occasions," approved curriculum events, or indoor spaces has drawn criticism.
Advocates argue this undermines commitments to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action and fails to honor the equal status of Indigenous nations."
This guy does not understand that many Canadians will not work at these "low skill" positions because "they won't get out of bed for under $38.00 an hour.
They also comprise of engineers, medical personnel, etc, but the barrier is Canada's rules regarding transfer of certification requirements to ensure they meet Canadian standards...
Quebec case regarding oath to the King...
👇👇👇👇
youtube.com/live/pze9_EK1EuE…
