是的,我都留着心眼呢🤣
【That's a remarkable change in American politics.】👏👍
🇺🇸🇮🇱 Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed is BACKING Trump's plan to end U.S. military aid to Israel, and he's willing to work with the president to make it happen.
But El-Sayed wants to go even further...
He questioned why America should continue selling weapons to Israel at all, arguing that U.S. resources should be spent on priorities at home instead.
For years, support for Israeli military aid was one of the few issues that united both parties in Washington.
Now a Democratic senator-elect and a Republican president are publicly supporting the same major policy shift, even if their reasons are very different.
That's a remarkable change in American politics.
Source: The Hill / Writer: Samuel
Replying to @Isabel_3299
这些亿万富翁可以控制傀儡政客立法,抢夺 TikTok。然后控制话语权,他们就可以继续在中东屠杀了。杀人越货,无恶不作。
为德州当选参议员塔拉里科经久不息地鼓掌👏😂,
他道出了美国的真正问题所在,而不是那些小视频展现的美国底层少数的带风向。
华川粉攻击那些只占1%的那群人,还满腔愤怒,输了中期选举还哭天抹泪,真是装瞎还是装傻?!😆
《比奥巴马更尖锐,与桑德斯同路:得州新参议员塔拉里科直指美国「上层对底层」》
年轻的新当选的参议员塔拉里科有这样一段话:「唯一在摧毁美国的少数群体,是亿万富翁。
跨性别者占人口的 1%,穆斯林占人口的 1%,无证移民占人口的 1%。我们盯错了 1%。
跨性别者没有夺走我们的医保,穆斯林没有削减我们学校的经费,移民也没有给他们自己和有钱朋友减税。是亿万富翁和他们的傀儡政客。
文化战争是烟幕弹。这个州、这个国家的很多分裂,都是亿万富翁制造出来的,他们想让我们彼此争斗,而不是去对付他们。他们想让我们左顾右盼,盯着身边的邻居,而不是抬起头来看着他们。
我们政治中最大的分歧,不是左对右,而是上层对底层。」
与奥巴马对比: 奥巴马 2004 年一举成名的演讲,主题是「没有红色的美国、蓝色的美国,只有美利坚合众国」,基调是团结与希望,很少直接点名富豪阶层。塔拉里科则直截了当:问题不在左右,而在上层对底层,矛头直指亿万富翁和金钱政治。在点明美国社会的根本问题上,他比当年的奥巴马更尖锐。不过,奥巴马执政后曾被批评离华尔街太近,塔拉里科能否言行一致,还要看他上任后的表现。
与桑德斯对比: 塔拉里科说的「上层对底层」「亿万富翁和傀儡政客」,与桑德斯一贯批评的「亿万富翁阶层」如出一辙,两人都把经济不平等和金钱政治视为核心问题,理念上与进步派最为接近。不同的是,桑德斯自称民主社会主义者,塔拉里科则以基督教信仰的语言讲公平与正义,这在保守的得州尤为重要。
(补遗:他说的“无证移民占人口的 1%。”不准确,应该是3%左右。)
埃及裔美国人当选参议员的思路是对的。
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Abdul El-Sayed was confronted by a University of Michigan student whose family comes from Iran:
"My cousin was hunted by the IRGC because her hijab wasn't on right, my uncle was sentenced to die...
The terror that we've experienced is insurmountable.
I want to ask if you stand unequivocally against the IRGC and the Islamic Republic of Iran that has killed 50,000 protestors."
Abdul El-Sayed:
"One can disagree with the governance of a foreign country. One can stand in solidarity with freedom and democracy movements.
But my worry is when one decides that we can go in and take out the leadership of a foreign government.
I will always stand for and with democratic movements, always, but I also don't believe that we were in the right to go to war and topple the government of Iran.
It is up to the people of Iran to decide what their leadership should look like."
Writer: Michael
阿肯色的乡巴佬,不知道怎么被AIPAC相中,被川普任命驻以色列大使,对鸠占鹊巢者屠杀巴勒斯坦儿童,怎样用他手里握着的圣经让自己的良心安睡在种族灭绝的血泊和废墟中??
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱 U.S. AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL HUCKABEE PUBLICLY DISAGREES WITH VANCE OVER GOP'S MIDTERM DEFEAT
Vance says Republican voters want a change in America's relationship with Israel following the party's election losses.
But Huckabee pushed back in an interview with Israel's Channel 12.
“I don't agree with that because I don't think that's where voters are.”
He claimed only 19% of Republicans share that concern, arguing that criticism of the relationship is concentrated on the far left.
Is Trump's own administration divided over how much Israel and the Iran war contributed to the GOP's defeat?
Source: The Times of Israel \ Writer: Naz




























