99% of these big KOLs are doing it yet people keep idolizing them.
keep exposing these mfers. no mercy.
One of crypto's largest KOLs has been secretly extracting millions from his audience
We’ll expose him soon
Unfortunately, he’s just a symptom of a much bigger problem
Social trading has brought out the worst in KOLs. It was designed to keep them honest by making every trade public. In reality, the opposite happened
In just a few weeks, we exposed a number of "top social traders" using the same tricks:
• Public wallets to attract copy traders
• Side wallets to dump
• Callouts to farm rewards
• Bundled tokens to hide supply
And there are plenty more doing the exact same thing
Why? Because our industry incentivizes it
1) Launchpads allow it
Most launchpads today are obsessed with one thing: volume. Millions in callout rewards, affiliate links, and top leaderboards. Almost nothing on detecting bundles, side wallets, or shady traders. Scams drive volume. Launchpads have no reason to stop it (other than actually caring about their users)
2) Social trading incentivizes it
Side wallets have become a business model. Before social trading, only big KOLs could do it. Now, anyone who lands on a leaderboard can monetize by dumping on their copy-traders. The temptation is real
3) CT normalizes bundle culture
“Everyone bundles. It's how it's done" - an excuse we hear every time we expose a KOL. Supply control isn't the problem. Hiding it is. If it's so bullish, why hide it? Spoiler: because you're planning to sell
***
Launchpads are paying millions to dishonest KOLs. It's time they start taking it seriously
Audit the top traders. Expose their side wallets. Ban repeat offenders
We have the tools. What's missing is the willingness to use them
No one's coming to save us
Replying to @afroreal @FvctCrvpto
Hi because you get rinsed by the same KOL grifters who have done it for years and never learn.
I tried calling out Ansem numerous times in the past for promoting micro cap and celeb tokens but gamblers brought him credibility and exit liquidity yet again this cycle.
So why should I care at all?
I am busy with recent incidents like the French bank heist, DPRK, or The Com where my work actually brings measurable impact rather than engagement from calling out known bad actors and saying the obvious.
Loot Survivor Beast Mode run over: level 30.
Ambushed by a "Brood Glow" Anansi.
Think you can make it further? Play today at: lootsurvivor.io/play?dungeon…
@lootsurvivor
Just picked my champ ⚡️
Download the Armored MMA app and play for free: onelink.to/amma_app
Frontier (@LootRealms) Season 0 · #41 of 187 realms
joined late but still had a lot of fun.
the game feels much more fluid than before. a real pleasure to play.
last call, lords.
@LootRealms Frontier Season 0 closes 6 Nov at 18:00 UTC.
> 181 realms founded
> 156 players new to Realms
> 300,000 $LORDS in the pot
Alright the Season 0 of @LootRealms Frontier ends tomorrow after @EFDevcon close, at 18:00 UTC (23:30 IST).
Let's see where we stand atm :
181 players founded a realm, and 156 of them had never played a Realms game before.
Amazing onboarding in Mumbai 🇮🇳
Starknet games are live at the Devcon 8 Game Zone in Mumbai:
> @LootRealms Frontier Season 0: 300,000 LORDS to loot, a new map daily, ends 06/11
> @LootSurvivor showcase and a Beasts Artathon on 05/11
this feeling > everything else
to this day, @LootSurvivor is the most addictive and rewarding fully on-chain game I've ever played ♥️
a single npm install gives a Starknet app:
> social login and gasless transactions
> swaps, lending, bridging, BTC staking
> shielded balances and private transfers
starkzap has 11,198 npm downloads since Feb 2026.
same 400B AI model. two attempts at proving what it said.
> before: a 93.6GB proof, almost a day to verify
> anthropic's FlashProve: 19MB, 17 seconds on a CPU
~5,000x smaller.
and the report names Starknet as a live network already running this kind of proof.
Anthropic is using cryptography StarkWare’s founders co-invented to prove which AI model answered you.
With FlashProve, you can verify that a specific model produced an output while keeping its weights private.
The report cites the original STARK paper, highlights the use of STARKs on @Starknet, and references formal verification work on Cairo and the S-two AIR. StarkWare co-founder Alessandro Chiesa is one of the report’s co-authors.
Another big validation for our Proving System.
The same cryptographic ideas that help scale blockchains are now helping make AI inference verifiable.
what starknet as an L1 would mean for $STRK staking, per the starknet signal
> validators would take on block production and proof production
> the staking mechanism would need to evolve
> the existing bridge stays open, secured by validity proofs
> the vote is non-binding, more votes would follow
1.89B STRK is staked today

























