Crypto market research. Dated plans, clear levels, chart updates & weekly reviews. Explore Private Team and the work behind the charts ↓
United Kingdom
Joined May 2017
- Tweets6.7K
- Following27
- Followers6.8K
- Likes10.2K
$Mihao Blueline entry @ 13M MCAP, can see this hitting 50M Mcap short term at the current rate it’s climbing.
However any closure below 9M MCAP & it’s a wrap for this token.
4
13
1,727
Type of coin you ignore buying then check back 5 minutes later solana:4CxjZyMNoF1p6eXHXHv1TWpS2X47CuUmLwtGe18spump
2
9
1,710
Jack Adams retweeted
We’re going to engulf this entire “bear market” so fast you will be questioning yourself about why you didn’t see the opportunity.
Look at where we are, zoom out. $BTC longs.
Tripple top fakeout on USDT.D, Target is 6% dominance from here, Roughly -16% drop.
I fail to see this closing higher than 7.25% this week.
Outcome of this reversal lower will send majors and majority of the market higher.
2
20
1,758
Soon we'll be back at 82K and everyone will be bullish again, heard mentality. Same emotions every cycle.
But buying at lows? oh no don't do that! its going to 60K
2
20
1,913
You will look back in Q1 2027 wondering why you didn't buy on large pullbacks, Spot, leverage or ETFs fund investments.
Regardless of your pick of the 3 above we both know its going higher.
These little $1000 drops are nothing in the grand scheme of things.
Elysium gives $HYPE another use, and I see that as positive overall but did it really need to happen?
If several apps keep those users, HYPE could gain a broader economic role over time. That is the case I like. Cheap transactions and weak retention could still make the added demand small relative to supply and valuation.
Over the next few weeks, moving existing $HYPE across a bridge could make the ecosystem look busy without creating equivalent new buying. I'd watch recurring fees from independent users rather than assume every bridged dollar is fresh demand.
Based off the current daily $HYPE chart this transition will most likely give it the pullback its been needing for awhile now, most likely $59 region before further expansion into $100
$Aave cutting limits isn't automatically a bearish signal to me. Its latest review lowers some caps while raising borrowing room elsewhere. That's selective risk management, not evidence that every lending market is shrinking or in trouble.
If tighter limits bind, users could feel the effect over the next few weeks. But Aave's own docs make the real liquidity issue clear: money already borrowed isn't available to withdraw. A cap headline doesn't tell you how much cash a reserve has.
Over a full cycle, saying no to poor risk could help Aave keep customers and trust. I'm positive on that discipline. It still doesn't make AAVE immune to a bad valuation, concentrated collateral or weak token economics.
2
1,211
Here's what I'd like to see that actually makes trading easier rather than another platform with the same features we're all use to trading with.
A proper trading terminal with portfolio risk, liquidity tracking, wallet activity and real execution data all in one place would be interesting.
Especially if it could help traders identify genuine opportunities while filtering out manipulated volume and poor liquidity. I think that's the sort of application that could bring people back consistently rather than just attracting attention around a launch.
$Elysium: what happens after the launch?
The part of Elysium I find interesting is what developers could build around Hyperliquid over the coming months. Mainnet gives that idea somewhere to run, but I am more interested in applications people keep using than another busy launch week.
For now, working withdrawals, usable liquidity and returning users would tell me whether the early attention has substance. Launch excitement could bring all three, although it could just as easily leave when incentives or promotion slow down.
That leaves me overall positive on the infrastructure, rather than bullish on everything carrying its name. If several independent apps build lasting demand, Elysium could earn a useful role. Dependence on one subsidised app would leave a much weaker case.
1
6
1,198
The $KNTQ idea is straightforward, Elysium earns fees, and some of that revenue is meant to fund buybacks.
I like having something we can actually check. The missing step is seeing those fees turn into purchases, rather than stopping at the plan.
For the next few weeks, the risk is excitement getting ahead of the money coming in. A generous percentage of a small fee pot still buys very little in the crypto space I'd put completed purchases next to new token releases before deciding what holders are really gaining.
Regular purchases could make me more positive over time, but where the tokens end up matters too. Coins held in a fund, tokens permanently removed and cash paid to stakers aren't the same thing. Emissions and unlocks could still outweigh the benefit.
6
1,347
A quiet second week for Elysium launchpad tells me more than a huge first day.
If independent builders and customers stick around, a launchpad could become a useful place for businesses to find funding over time. That's the version I'd be positive on. Replacing last week's abandoned coins with this week's launches is much less convincing overall, the project needs better use case for traders longterm based off current metrics.
Otherwise it'll flop after a few weeks.
$Elysium: what happens after the launch?
The part of Elysium I find interesting is what developers could build around Hyperliquid over the coming months. Mainnet gives that idea somewhere to run, but I am more interested in applications people keep using than another busy launch week.
For now, working withdrawals, usable liquidity and returning users would tell me whether the early attention has substance. Launch excitement could bring all three, although it could just as easily leave when incentives or promotion slow down.
That leaves me overall positive on the infrastructure, rather than bullish on everything carrying its name. If several independent apps build lasting demand, Elysium could earn a useful role. Dependence on one subsidised app would leave a much weaker case.
1
3
1,129
$Elysium: what happens after the launch?
The part of Elysium I find interesting is what developers could build around Hyperliquid over the coming months. Mainnet gives that idea somewhere to run, but I am more interested in applications people keep using than another busy launch week.
For now, working withdrawals, usable liquidity and returning users would tell me whether the early attention has substance. Launch excitement could bring all three, although it could just as easily leave when incentives or promotion slow down.
That leaves me overall positive on the infrastructure, rather than bullish on everything carrying its name. If several independent apps build lasting demand, Elysium could earn a useful role. Dependence on one subsidised app would leave a much weaker case.
Another one for the timeline. $Near has now officially pulled back into my buy regions after a -35% drop.
Gave you the heads up at highs now ready for the second wave into $5-$10.
$NEAR isn’t worth the current price in these market conditions I stand on $3-$3.50 being the next best spot to buy this asset.
We’re going to engulf this entire “bear market” so fast you will be questioning yourself about why you didn’t see the opportunity.
