Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch) header
Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch) profile picture

I am a historian of the British constitution whose work focuses on the Crown, the House of Lords, and the Church of England

Madison, WI
Joined June 2011
Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)Photo by Jason Loch πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@JasonLoch)
These Letters Patent have me perplexed. They lack the usual warranty ("By HM's Command" is normally seen on Royal Warrants rather than patents) and they don't bear the surname of the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery. I also can't make out the seal. πŸ€”1/2
4
1
13
1,485
The Wafer Great Seal is the most likely candidate, but that seems a bit odd in this context. I'd expect a patent granting City status to have the pendant Great Seal. 2/2
2
230
While falling down the rabbit hole of American Privy Seals, I found this very fancy instrument bearing the Executive Privy Seal of New York. It certifies that a pen was used to sign a bill into law. Note that it's been countersigned by the Secretary to the Governor.
1
42
1,847
Today, the Letters Patent the Law Officers receive after taking office are somewhat unusual in that they confirm the appointments instead of making them. But a 1936 Warrant for the Solicitor General's patent suggests he *was* appointed by the instrument.🧐1/2
1
1
4
564
I wondered if the 1936 patent might have been worded differently because his predecessor was appointed by a previous Monarch, but the Warrant for the patent confirming the appointment of Charles III's first Solicitor General included the now-standard confirmatory language. 2/2
3
156
The end of a Parliament traditionally involves two Privy Council meetings. The first approves the legislature's prorogation while the second approves its dissolution. Several days normally elapse between these meetings, but on Nov. 28, 1910, they took place just two hours apart.
1
1
19
755
TFW you learn that the Cabinet Office hasn't even started the internal review you requested on January 5. πŸ™ƒ
9
575
Some further thoughts on ecclesiastical advice. Removing these religious disabilities is consistent with the Royal Supremacy in its modern form. It’s incongruous that Burnham can’t advise on appointments but can vote on Church matters in the Commons. venerablepuzzle.wordpress.co…
2
7
1,040
I'm starting a new series on my blog. CBAI Spotlight takes a closer look at documents from the Corpus of British Administrative Instruments. First up: a pair of Letters Patent from the Duchy of Lancaster appointing a Chancellor and an Attorney General. venerablepuzzle.wordpress.co…
3
363
The Royal Warrant governing the King's various Awards for Enterprise is a relatively rare example of an instrument that is still published in full in The Gazette. However, the Gazette notice now omits the countersigning Minister's name. 1/4
1
18
4,298
It's somewhat rare for the British Prime Minister to countersign a Royal Warrant. It's far more common for one of the Secretaries of State (especially the Justice Secretary) to perform that function. 3/4
2
6
585
The omission of the Prime Minister's name doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of things, but it would be nice if they went back to including it. In a situation like this, the countersignature clarifies that the King has acted on the advice of a responsible minister. 4/4
1
6
432
When a new Lord Chancellor takes office, there will likely be a number of instruments that are in the process of being sealed. A Warrant from the King allows the new Lord Chancellor to affix the Great Seal to these documents. Here's Shabana Mahmood's Warrant from 2024. 1/6
1
2
25
3,853
Similar Warrants were issued after a Demise of the Crown, though the text was slightly different. But in 2022, the King issued a Warrant to the Lord Chancellor directing him to seal the patent conferring city status on Doncaster that was awaiting sealing when the Queen died. 5/6
1
2
330
If the King had given the Lord Chancellor general permission to pass grants depending under the Great Seal in the usual manner, a special Warrant for the Doncaster patent would presumably have been unnecessary. This suggests there has been a change in practice. 6/6
1
272