Suppressed here for stating certain truths. Realist, thus actually Catholic. Jeremias 5:21; 6:16. Unaffiliated with the superb https://nitter.gq/t.co/EYqrA2QMtF
Joined June 2023
- Tweets16.4K
- Following462
- Followers1K
- Likes7.3K
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
Correct. The hell-overcome entity spawned by the Judas Council of Vatican II and now led by Antipope Leo XIV is not, and cannot possibly be, the actual Catholic Church. It's the prophesied ape-church, with Leo as the latest diabolical ape of St. John the Baptist.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
There was never any rational basis for any confusion or giving Leo "the benefit of the doubt." He was crystal clear from the very start of his pseudo-pontificate that he was fully on board with Francis and thus the Judas Council of Vatican II.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
This makes perfect sense. Just as the bovine masses will enthusiastically welcome the Antichrist, so do they now welcome his latest precursor/forerunner, Antipope Leo XIV.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
Francis was a rabid apostate and most likely a flaming faggot as well. He led countless millions of souls to eternal hell. He thus was not an actual pope, and there’s no rational basis to believe he’s anywhere other than the deepest pit of hell.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
You encounter a still body lying on the ground. Coagulating pools of blood encircle it. Frenzied maggots are eating out the rotting eye sockets. A horrid, almost visible stench is emanating from this body. You're on the verge of vomiting. Which of the following do you do?
89%Conclude it's a dead body
11%Await coroner's ruling
66 votes • Final results Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
Rather, the Nope Pope. Apostate = outside the Church. Thus he cannot possibly be an actual pope, as one cannot be the visible head of a body of which one is not a member. No authority is needed to see and accept this reality. One need not be a coroner to recognize a dead body.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
From Fr. Cekada in 2019, but as relevant as ever: The Errors of Bishop Athanasius Schneider - fathercekada.com/2019/04/06/…
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
The hell-overcome entity now led by papal pretender Leo is not the Catholic Church. This becomes clearer with each passing day to those with eyes to see and ears to hear.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
The only rational conclusion, based on this and much more, is that Leo himself is a flaming sodomite.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
Leo continues proving that he’s a devoted disciple of Antipope Francis.
Antipope Francis: Eco-Freak from Hell
youtu.be/cRDNjR9IQ-w
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
Liturgical Devastation: Is it due to Vatican II? YES akacatholic.com/liturgical-d…
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
You’re looking at a fake pope receiving a fake British ambassador. Such is today’s infernal empire of lies officially inaugurated by the Judas Council of Vatican II.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
"Affliction is always accompanied by grace; grace is proportionate to suffering. The measure of my gifts is increased with the measure of trials. The cross is the true and only road that leads souls to Heaven".
~Jesus to St. Rose of Lima
Image: Santa Rosa de Lima, Francisco Laso, 1859.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
Hell HAS prevailed over the apostate sod entity now led by Leo. Thus this entity cannot possibly be the actual Catholic Church. To call it so is to call Jesus Christ a liar (see Mt. 16:18).
Pause. Read all of that again and again. Contemplate. Resist the urge to respond.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
Whenever the conservative and quasi-trad pundits are out of answers or arguments, they'll just say "the Pope is an enigma". They've done it since Paul VI. Here, it just happened again: cruxnow.com/news-analysis/20…
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
In newly-released write-up, Dom Alcuin Reid reduces papal authority to infallibility when he says that "a General Audience address is not of itself a binding, infallible teaching" - dianemontagna.substack.com/p… The truth is that all magisterial papal teaching is binding, though not all is infallible. Reid's error is to think that papal authority is grounded in infallibility rather than in the lawful succession to a divinely-established office. If Reid were right, it would follow that unless a Pope makes an infallible declaration, his teaching would be a mere opinion one can agree with or not. But then, that is precisely the premise Reid needs his readers to hold, since he goes on to criticize the non-infallible teaching of the man he believes to be the Pope. Ah, but he blames it on unnamed 'drafters' of the text, of course! It's not Leo's fault, you see. It's those who wrote the text for him - as if his job were merely to read aloud what others wrote.
Jeremiah Alphonsus retweeted
The hard reality is that the vast majority of professed Catholics will not accept the truth NO MATTER WHAT. Such is the working of the prophesied “operation of error” in this the Great Apostasy.
