“Functionally illiterate” kids who communicate via text every day and do nothing but read on their phones.
Replying to @JimsTweets
Weird because the government tests public school kids and half are functionally illiterate and nothing happens there. Meanwhile homeschooled kids run circles around everyone else on all outcomes so you’re worried about the wrong things lol
1
1,013
These “think tank” experts are all funded by Meta and Googles top shareholders, and they want to continue to rewrite the First Amendment to grant artificial concepts the same protections that individuals receive.
They are what the gun lobby morphed into.
They are all traitors.
Replying to @JerrBearr @bruh76027799
I want you to consider for a moment the possibility that when a bunch of experts on First Amendment law all agree with each other, it’s because they’re all right and not because they’re all lying.
889
This is the guy who handed our nations military over to Israel. Literally it’s this guy.
Speaks for itself:
Feb. 25, 2026: “We are not developing long-range missiles… we have limited the range below 2,000 kilometers” — Iran’s FM Araghchi (IRNA).
March 20, 2026: Iran fires missiles at Diego Garcia—ranging 4,000 kilometers (WSJ). ⬇️
1
575
It’s literally true, though.
Zionists pretend like antisemitism is just some sort of disease so they can always use it as a cudgel.
We know why Hitler did what he did; to create scapegoats.
Why it happened in the ME; for money.
What’s the root of it now?
Noah just wants to justify antisemitism. He would never say that Afghanistan prohibiting girls from school or Saudi Arabia chopping up a journalist is grounds for anti-Muslim bigotry.
1
356
Like all the other tech guys, Marc is just a middle manager snake oil salesman who benefited from a unique period of market deregulation.
Much of our societal problems come from allowing sociopaths like him to accumulate so much wealth.
3
425
The easiest test of constitutional illiteracy is the Second Amendment; the idea that it creates an “uninfringable right” that can also be infringed upon (felons, mentally ill, etc) shows how dumb these guys are.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
2
2
335
This type of response is typical of the Zionist propaganda network.
Make extreme, made up claims then make a response like this when challenged.
It’s classic hasbara tactics and these bots just pump it out.
unavailable
1
169
30 minutes ago it was 36,000, and now it’s 3,000.
You simply cannot ever believe these propaganda bots. They do nothing but lie.
138
Rebeccah believes that murdering school children is an effective way to “break the will” of a people.
And yet if you asked her about her own people, she’d say that violence against them only strengthen their resolve.
This is the hypocrisy of the Zionist on full display.
None of what Sacks says here is true. And by saying this objectively untrue stuff he is doing a real disservice to the President who is clearly intentionally trying to break the will of the Iranians. And that’s putting it very mildly.
156
Marks publication exists to focus on political wedge issues to radicalize Americans, so when he talks about things like this he’s speaking from a position of expertise.
What’s so insanely disingenuous about this is Platner’s side is the one that started all the culture wars he’s talking about.
If he thinks culture wars are a “distraction” from important stuff, maybe he can tell his friends to cool it with drag queen story hour.
93
This guy runs private schools in an Orthodox community that exists entirely thanks to welfare. Thanks, tax payers.
"Antisemitism doesn't exist because there are wealthy Jews" is an incredibly stupid and evil response to the news that a terrorist just tried to murder 140 Jewish preschool children in Detroit.
With insights like that, Matt should be working at the NY Times.
60
“You’re too dumb to understand our voter security system”
“Oh yea? Here’s a Grok about how SSN numbers are used to verify voters, but I don’t know what “SSN” means!”
Conservatives have below room temp IQs
298
“If more than 5 people disagree with what the President is doing, then he must be allowed to do it” is a hell of a take from a “conservative intellectual”
As a non-lawyer, I read Kavanaugh's opinion and am persuaded. I read Gorsuch and think he's got some good points, too. Then I see there are *seven* opinions and think it must be a really close, not-so-clear call. Given all that, I think: With all that division, maybe they should have deferred to the president's judgment. And I have the sneaking suspicion that Trump might have won, had he been a little less capricious in declaring tariffs, even using the same authority at issue in the SCOTUS case.
349
Over on Conservative Twitter, a “totally straight guy” is pretending to be a woman to flirt with other men on Hinge.
Really can’t make this stuff up.
Day 2 of the hinge experiment:
Today I’m ONLY matching with men who have “liberal” or pronouns in their bio
I’ve also made Mads a she/they/them/xe??
Stay tuned for results…
1
708
















