John Roberts Brakey

I just subscribed to CODE RED -- Protecting Election 2026. Sign up here: jds14.substack.com/?r=r5j3&u…

Robert Pape’s analysis supports focusing on the post-midterm window to January 3.⁠Professorrobertpape.substack The University of Chicago political scientist argues Iran’s oil-price attrition strategy contributed to Republican midterm losses, and that the roughly 60 days before the new Congress is seated create higher risk of further escalation. A lame-duck president faces lower domestic political costs, while three “humiliated” leaderships (Trump, Putin, and Iran’s regime after Ali Khamenei’s killing on 28 February 2026) may favor escalation. Democrats won both chambers; Vance and others linked the losses to the war, and Iranian officials have celebrated the result. Trump has acknowledged the war’s role while weighing next steps.⁠Newarab Psychiatric concerns from Mary Trump and a group of doctors (including Abraham and Lee) entered in the 30 April 2026 Congressional Record rest on public behavior only; the signatories stated they had not examined him and offered no formal diagnosis. The White House physician’s 29 May 2026 report found a normal neurological exam and a perfect 30/30 Montreal Cognitive Assessment score.⁠Bmj The narrower point—that major new offensive action should face congressional scrutiny before 3 January, and that self-defense claims should not become a blank check—is a standard war-powers argument independent of any psychological assessment.

Preventing Iran War Escalation Before January 3 Friends, Professor Robert Pape's warning belongs on the front burner right now. I am sharing his November 5 briefing and this executive summary because the election has not ended the danger. The period before the new Congress takes office on January 3, 2027, demands immediate public attention and bipartisan action. Pape’s position is clear: no new offensive strikes against Iran and no expansion of this war before January 3. Any plans for such attacks should be halted. Necessary action to repel an actual attack must be narrowly justified and subject to immediate congressional scrutiny. A claim of self-defense must not become a blank check for a wider war. The American people have just voted in a consequential election. They deserve time to evaluate the war, hear the evidence, and consider the alternatives before another decision produces irreversible consequences. Congress must act now to protect that opportunity. I too am deeply concerned about Trump's judgment and how he may respond to political humiliation. The country cannot depend on his personal restraint as its only protection against further escalation. There are documented professional and family warnings behind that concern. In July, his niece Mary Trump, a clinical psychologist, described what she regards as longstanding psychological problems and worsening cognitive functioning. Separately, medical and mental health professionals, including psychiatrists Henry David Abraham and Bandy Lee, issued a statement entered into the Congressional Record on April 30, 2026, questioning his fitness for office. They cited concerns about cognition, judgment, impulse control, and threats of violence. Those professionals expressly stated that they had not examined Trump face to face and were not offering a formal diagnosis. The White House physician's May 29 report, by contrast, described normal neurological findings and a cognitive screening score of 30 out of 30. These are disputed assessments, not an established diagnosis. The need for congressional oversight does not depend on resolving that dispute. Pape is right to demand action before January 3. We should help bring that demand to public attention, ask our representatives to respond, and insist that the risks be examined before further attacks occur. Please read what Professor Pape wrote and the video conference he had on the 5th of November. escalationtrap.substack.com/…

Substack Friends, I’ve published my new e-book, From Trust to Confidence: A Citizen’s Guide to Publicly Verifiable Elections. It brings together years of work and practical steps toward elections people can independently verify. Please read and share it. Short on time? Start with the executive summary. Election confidence requires traceable evidence: preserved paper ballots, ballot images, cast vote records, and documented reconciliations—with ballot secrecy protected. Our’s principle—“Voting must be secret; counting must be public”—guides this five-part Cassandra Series compilation, prepared with input from former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett. Examining the March 2026 Pima County Regional Transportation Authority election, the book asks whether explanations for reporting changes can be independently reproduced. It does not claim the certified outcome was wrong. Auditable Ballot Examination (ABE), the free Excel-based tool developed by Brakey and AUDIT USA, links cast vote records to ballot images where lawful access and reliable identifiers exist. Reviewers can compare recorded selections with visible marks. Preserved paper ballots remain essential checks on digital records. This complements rather than replaces risk-limiting audits. Appropriate privacy protections, documented custody, and clear procedures matter. Discrepancies may reflect corrections, eligibility adjustments, or timing—not necessarily wrongdoing. The demand is simple: make election explanations reproducible and supporting evidence available for independent public examination. johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/c…

Friends, I’ve just published my new e-book, From Trust to Confidence: A Citizen’s Guide to Publicly Verifiable Elections. It brings together years of work, difficult questions, and practical steps toward elections we can independently verify. I’d appreciate your taking a look and sharing it with others. Short on time? Start with the executive summary. Here’s the link: johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/c…

Friends, I’ve just published my new e-book, From Trust to Confidence: A Citizen’s Guide to Publicly Verifiable Elections. It brings together years of work, difficult questions, and practical steps toward elections we can independently verify. I’d appreciate your taking a look and sharing it with others. Short on time? Start with the executive summary. Here’s the link: johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/c…

I just subscribed to CODE RED -- Protecting Election 2026. Sign up here: jds14.substack.com/?r=r5j3&u…

I’ve just published my new E-book link, “From Trust to Confidence: A Citizen’s Guide to Publicly Verifiable Elections.” It brings together 22 years of work, difficult questions, and practical steps toward elections we can independently verify. I’d appreciate your taking a look and sharing it with others. Short on time? Start with the executive summary. Here’s the link: johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/c… [E-book link] John R Brakey

Cassandra Series - From Trust to Confidence A Citizen’s Guide to Publicly Verifiable Elections johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/c…

The Cassandra Series | Part Five of Five From Trust to Proof: A Practical Strategy for Verifiable Elections johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/t…

Elections!!Read it. Listen to it. Question it. And please share it. 🎵 Start with the music. Then follow the evidence. Part Four of The Cassandra Series is now published: “Protective Reflex and Institutional Response.” Why spend a little time with it?

Read it. Listen to it. Question it. And please share it. 🎵Start with the music. Then follow the evidence. Part Four of The Cassandra Series is now published: “Protective Reflex and Institutional Response.” Why spend a little time with it? • See why correcting an election report—and showing the public how it was corrected—both matter. • Explore how election officials and citizens can build confidence together. • Learn how to use an AI assistant to understand complicated records, ask better questions, and check the answers against the original documents. I want our election officials to succeed. Public verification can help all of us. 🎵 Listen: suno.com/s/f2lXPcN6uieO6yCX 📖 Read Part Four: johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/c…

Cassandra Series | Part Four of Five: Protective Reflex and Institutional Response johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/c…

Cassandra series: Verify every vote chatgpt.com/s/m_6ac541274350…

Plase read and Share: We expect banks to explain our charges, assessors to document our property taxes, and courts to examine evidence. Why should elections be the exception? In Part Three of the Cassandra Series, I explore what equipment tests establish, what actual-ballot audits add, and what questions remain unanswered about Pima County’s RTA election. A missing explanation does not prove the result was wrong. It gives us a reason to ask for the records needed to evaluate it. Whatever your party, you deserve understandable evidence supporting the count. Voting is secret. Counting should be publicly verifiable. Read Part Three—and share it with someone who believes public confidence should be earned through evidence. johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/t…

The Cassandra Series | Part Three of Five: What Election Tests and Audits Can—and Cannot—Establish johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/t…

The Cassandra Series, Prologue Part Three: Faith in Elections Must Be Matched by Proof johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/t…

The Cassandra Series, Prologue Part Three: Faith in Elections Must Be Matched by Proof johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/t…

Cassandra Series, Prologue Part Two: The Courage to Say “I Don’t Know Yet” johnrbrakey.substack.com/p/t…