“The parents aren’t doing their jobs.” I agree. Too many parents are a hindrance to their own child’s education. But under our current system, the school still has to serve their kids. If we can teach them despite their parents, then we have work to do. If we can’t, we need to explain why we’re requiring them to spend their childhoods in buildings where, by our own admission, they aren’t going to learn anything. Apparently, school is so essential that children must attend it, but so powerless that we can’t expect it to accomplish much unless their parents have already done everything right. Perhaps you’re keeping them safe. Perhaps you’re making it possible for their parents to go to work. Those are useful services. They’re also services provided by a babysitter. They do not, by themselves, justify making attendance compulsory. And the obligation has to run both ways. If a student persistently refuses to behave well enough to be taught, despite reasonable efforts to address that behavior, the school must be able to end that placement. We cannot require a school to keep a student who prevents everyone else from learning and then hold the school responsible for everyone’s failure to learn. A school that cannot educate its students needs to be fixed. A school that cannot be fixed needs to close. A placement that provides no education should not be compulsory merely because we haven’t bothered to create one that does. Bad parenting is a reason a child needs a functioning school. It is a piss-poor defense of a school that doesn’t function. “The parents failed them first” is a remarkably poor argument for being allowed to fail them next.

For YEARS, I was told to “meet students where they’re at”… …then, I was questioned about why so many students are behind and need an IEP before they’re working at several grade levels BELOW their current grade level. Districts have dug us into a hole and they do t know how to get us out. We’ve created a culture of “meeting students where they’re at” with no actual plan to get them where they need to be. Stop lowering the bar for our students! Raise the bar, provide support and explicit instruction and GET THEM TO WHERE THEY NEED TO BE! Best presentation I’ve heard in years! Dr. Huggins is saying what every teacher has been too scared to say out loud for years!! @researchEDCan

“Let's just move on" isn't a plan. It's an escape hatch. Kids didn't learn to read. Someone needs to say: We were wrong. Now that we know better, we're doing better. @MissyPurcell says it perfectly 👇 misspurcell.substack.com/p/i… #ScienceOfReading

There's a lot of talk about whether we can trust PISA scores or not. PISA is not the only international test. TIMSS & PIRLS are run by a different research group, and have a slightly different focus. They test reading, maths & science but with more of a focus on specific curriculum knowledge. England is also the only country outside East Asia to come in the top 10 on all the TIMSS & PIRLS tests too. More here. substack.nomoremarking.com/p…

What are the most effective methods of improving student achievement? An NYT investigation. For me, the data point in the bottom left quadrant is absolutely critical to understanding why student achievement goes wrong so often: teachers making up their own curriculum. nytimes.com/2026/09/28/upsho…

You can't persuade people that observation and coaching can and will be a positive experience - a professional, motivating discussion not a judgement or evaluation - unless that's actually true. It needs to be sincere. Teachers need a chance to share their thinking and ideas, not just be told what the observer thought. Once people experience that, they begin to value and trust it. But if you're relentlessly in 'drop in and tell them' mode, things won't change. It's no wonder so many teachers resist these things - because they've been burned by the stream of 'feedback' launched at them by a string of people who didn't think it was worth asking them first.

There are academics who have built their whole career on making the teaching of simple arithmetic unnecessarily complicated. Practice has been turned into a bad word in math & explicitly teaching is often something that’s supposed to be avoided. Children have suffered for it. Math has suffered for it. Universities and academia are partly to blame by often rewarding the publication of flawed education research. The problem is that these academics can be hugely influential on curriculum, textbooks, teacher education, and professional development. Because who would think an education expert isn’t really an expert? When someone has built their whole career on bad ideas, it’s going to be hard to get them to change course. That is why it is true that math needs a phonics-style revolution.

“Phonics is necessary but insufficient.” England’s results reinforce a critical truth: reading comprehension depends on knowledge. History, science, literature, geography, art, and music build the knowledge and vocabulary that make comprehension possible. nationalreview.com/2026/09/w…

It's difficult to overestimate how damaging this view of teaching and learning has been for so many kids. Virtually every teacher trained over the last 50 years was taught that knowing stuff is the least important part of thinking. This image taken from Utica University's assessment resources for faculty: utica.edu/academic/Assessmen…

📘 My new Teaching for Attention Playbook is a 70+ page, evidence-informed guide that breaks down the science of attention and provides 6 practical strategies to support teachers. It covers how to: 🎯 Secure Attention: Create the conditions for students to focus 🎯 Direct Attention: Guide students towards important information 🎯 Orchestrate Attention: Manage where attention goes as learning unfolds 👉 Want a free copy? REPOST and comment ATTENTION below, and I’ll DM you the link. ⏰ Available free until Wednesday 30 September at 11:59pm AWST

“Learning” information without practicing reproducing it is not really learning it. It’s really just “loading” the information into short-term memory. The fact that it’s in short-term memory can trick you into thinking it’s going to stay there. But in reality, it dissipates quickly, and the only way you can bring it back without reloading it from an external reference is if you’re able to retrieve the information from long-term memory. That's why learning really amounts to increasing your ability to recall information from long-term memory unassisted – an action that can be trained by repeatedly performing it in gradually more challenging contexts.

Instead of bringing in guest speakers to talk about teaching and inspire us with anecdotes, why not have them actually teach? Put them in a real classroom and let’s watch the magic happen. Let us see how they plan, how they adjust in the moment, how they respond to student questions, manage behavior, and assess understanding. Now that’s the kind of professional development that would actually inspire me.

Another take-away from @nhannahjones's piece...if you, consciously or unconsciously, think "the smart kids will always be okay," you're wrong. The smart kids need attention and good instruction too.

This may be the first time I can remember everyone on this site asking the right question about school discipline: At what point does one student’s right to remain in the classroom stop outweighing 25 other students’ right to learn? That it took people outside education to ask it should force those of us inside education to confront a much more uncomfortable question: Why have we been answering it wrong for so long?

This may be the first time I can remember everyone on this site asking the right question about school discipline: At what point does one student’s right to remain in the classroom stop outweighing 25 other students’ right to learn? That it took people outside education to ask it should force those of us inside education to confront a much more uncomfortable question: Why have we been answering it wrong for so long?