Restore Britain, Rstore Britain volunteer, Patriot, anti-communust, free speach union, zero white guilt, Zionist (Fuck Hamas), leave the EU, make Britain Great
Joined January 2025
- Tweets29.5K
- Following1.5K
- Followers1.2K
- Likes42.9K
Jonathan Roberts retweeted
A year ago, British media reached out to me to participate in a hit piece about Russell Brand's rape allegations.
It was weird. I told them I'm not a victim, we'd never met, and they still pushed me to find anything to say.
Whatever's going on, it's very organized and vicious.
Jonathan Roberts retweeted
Denmark did the maths on immigrants
Basically they are costing us a fortune
There’s a reason we are not a wealthy country and it’s because of this
Jonathan Roberts retweeted
I strongly believe that those politicians and civil servants who knowingly opened our borders, deliberately welcomed these third world invaders into our home and then forced the consequences onto our once high-trust communities MUST be held to account.
Every last one of them. And I really mean that. Trials. Prosecutions. Prison. Because just look at what they have done to our Britain. OUR home.
Go to any town centre. What do you see? Gangs of foreign men, loitering around. Drinking. Shouting. Spitting. Even defecating. Contributing absolutely nothing. Intimidating local women, turning our society into the third world dump they supposedly fled.
The arrogance of these scumbags, honestly. Break into our home, receive hotel accommodation. Food, drink, spending money. Recreational activities. Treatment our veterans could only ever imagine. And where have they come from?
Afghanistan. Iran. Syria. Eritrea. Sudan. Iraq. Somalia. Yemen.
In short, NO THANKS.
I don’t want anyone coming into our home from these countries. Legally or otherwise. I certainly don’t want these bastards getting ferried into Dover because they had the ingenuity to risk their lives on some shitty dinghy in a cheap tracksuit.
Never underestimate just how backward these countries are, just how divorced from our experience of life. Third world doesn’t do it justice. There is simply no benefit to having these men in our country. Not one.
They’re just not like us.
Rape, murder, slavery, terrorism, child exploitation. Is this a risk you're willing to take? Because I am NOT.
The politicians who made this happen. THEY KNEW IT, but did it anyway.
Boris Johnson. Keir Starmer. Robert Jenrick. Andy Burnham. Shabana Mahmood. Suella Braverman. Priti Patel. Yvette Cooper - many serving MPs in Labour, Reform, the Conservatives.
A Restore Britain Government will force every single one of them to testify, under oath, exactly what they knew, when they knew it and why they did it. And yes. If there is evidence they knowingly placed dangerous third world invaders into British communities, putting women and children at risk? Prosecutions will follow.
We will show the British people exactly what those politicians were shown. Unredacted. In full.
And not only will they be held to account, but Restore Britain will reverse the entire deviant and repugnant experiment.
Every single migrant who arrived illegally will be removed - if they have been granted legal status by our corrupt establishment since this invasion began, that will be stripped from them. They will be detained, and they will be deported. Visas reversed, passports shredded. In the millions. Men, women and children. All of them.
Restore Britain has laid out EXACTLY how we will do it. In precise detail. How we will overhaul our legal framework to allow it, how we will create a hostile environment to force them out voluntarily, how we will detain the rest, how we will force their own governments to accept them back.
How we will deport millions.
It can be done, it must be done, it will be done.
If you agree with what I’m saying, then vote for it. You can back the Tories or Reform, two parties stuffed full of the same traitorous ministers who imported the barbarians to start with. That's up to you. Or you can vote Restore Britain. The only party with the balls to finally do what needs to be done.
Your choice. Take it.
Jonathan Roberts retweeted
🚨 Klaus Schwab, Emmanuel Macron, Gabriel Attal, Édouard Philippe, Ursula von der Leyen, George Soros, AOC, Bernie Sanders, Obama 🚨
I have a message for you.
You got one word wrong.
In 2016, the World Economic Forum released a little video of "predictions for 2030." The famous line: "You'll own nothing, and you'll be happy."
One word is wrong. The correct version is: "You'll own nothing, and we'll be happy."
We all know why you changed it.
Officially, it was a scenario. A piece of fiction to make people think. Fine. Then let's reread the Davos library and count how many "fictions" turned into roadmaps.
Our property: renting for life. No car, you share one. No house, you rent. No things, you subscribe. Everything becomes a service, and every service has an off switch.
Our plates: very serious articles explaining that insects finally deserve their place in our diet. The ribeye stays on the Davos buffet.
Our movement: the 15-minute city, and the "personal carbon allowance" that tracks what you consume, where you go, what you buy. For the planet, obviously.
Our identity: a single digital ID that follows you from the airport to your bank.
Our money: as early as January 2020, the Forum published a toolkit to help central banks launch their own digital currencies.
And to top it all off, in June 2020, in the middle of lockdown, Klaus published The Great Reset. It took a pandemic for anyone to dare put that title on a book cover. Klaus left the Forum in 2025. His work is doing just fine without him.
And that date, 2030. Does it ring a bell?
In 2015, the UN adopted Agenda 2030. 17 goals, 169 targets, to reorganize pretty much everything we produce, consume, eat and own. In June 2019, Klaus went to New York and signed a strategic partnership with the UN to accelerate its implementation.
The 2016 video. The 2020 Great Reset. The UN Agenda. Same horizon, same vocabulary, same method.
You call it sustainable development. Change the packaging as many times as you like. Everyone knows where you're trying to take us: a world where committees decide, in place of the people, what they produce, what they consume, and what they're allowed to own.
That has had a name for a hundred years. And it isn't the free market. It's communism.
But a plan doesn't implement itself. You need staff.
Enter the Young Global Leaders program. Officially, a network of "exceptional leaders" under 40. In reality, a cadre school. The Komsomol, with a Davos badge.
You join young. You learn the house language: governance, resilience, public-private partnership, transition. You come out with a global Rolodex and a loyalty that never goes through an election.
Emmanuel, class of 2016. Economy minister at the time. President the following year.
Gabriel, same house. Prime Minister at 34.
Édouard went through the other nursery, the French-American Foundation's Young Leaders. Same concept, different sponsor.
And Klaus never hid it. In 2017, at Harvard, he proudly explained that thanks to this young generation, the Forum was able to "penetrate the cabinets" of governments.
It's not a conspiracy. It's on their website. That's the craziest part.
An apparatchik is someone whose career depends on the apparatus rather than the voters. We didn't change the concept. We just changed the apparatus.
The Forum doesn't pass laws. It doesn't need to. It has its alumni. And it has the European Union.
Davos writes the scenarios. Brussels turns them into regulations.
Ursula, you're the good little soldier.
The European Digital Identity Wallet, which every member state must offer by the end of 2026.
An EU-wide cap on cash payments starting in 2027. In France, the limit is already €1,000.
Chat Control, the plan to scan private messages, which keeps coming back in new packaging.
A carbon tax on your heating and your gas tank starting in 2028.
And the centerpiece: the digital euro.
Ursula's Commission put the bill on the table in June 2023. On June 23, the European Parliament's economic affairs committee adopted its position, 43 votes to 14. Its chair, French MEP Aurore Lalucq, hailed "a historic day for Europe." In July, the full Parliament followed. Target: 2029.
And if you're worried, Aurore Lalucq already has an answer for you: the idea that the ECB would monitor your purchases is supposedly far-right fake news.
On one word, she's right. It is historic.
Because a currency issued by the central bank to every citizen, with a cap decided from above on how much you're allowed to hold, plugged into a digital ID, on a continent that limits cash and wants to read your messages, has a name in economics. Not the market. Central planning.
The Soviet Union had a single bank, the Gosbank. It dreamed of seeing everything, but all it had was paper. For the first time in history, the tool exists.
Hayek wrote it in 1944: economic control is not the control of one sector of life among others. It is control of the means for all our ends.
Control the money, and you control everything else. Where you go. What you eat. What you say.
I'm not saying they'll use it tomorrow morning. I'm saying they're building the cage bar by bar, each with an excellent reason: sovereignty, security, the planet, the children. And a cage never asks the opinion of whoever will hold the key twenty years from now.
Few regimes in history have had this level of control. None ever got it with the smiling consent of the people being locked in.
And since we're talking about wrong words, there's a second one. In your own name.
World Economic Forum.
"Economic" no longer matches the product. An economy is free people who own, trade and choose. You plan what they eat, how they move and how much they're allowed to hold.
So push the update. One word to change: replace "Economic" with "Communist."
World Communist Forum.
It'll be more honest. And at least people will know what you're dragging them into.
20th-century communism had tanks. The 21st-century version has an app.
You'll own nothing. And they'll be happy.
🤖 Made with AI
Jonathan Roberts retweeted
Jimmy Saville abused ~450 children over a 50 year period.
Keir Starmer - the Director of Public Prosecutions - declined to prosecute.
The case file was later destroyed.
And the BBC covered it up.
Jonathan Roberts retweeted
Hey @HFalconerMP something for you to read.
‘Britain’s relative performance since 2016 is a reminder that sovereignty over regulation is not automatically a handicap, and that the bigger constraint for the major European economies remains the bureaucratic and policy environment [of the EU].’
How does it help the UK to tie ourselves once again to the economic drag of the EU?
Isn’t that interesting? Britain has outgrown major EU economies, France, Italy and Germany, in real GDP since Brexit. Doomsday scenarios of immediate economic freefall never materialised. The UK faced friction in goods trade with the EU and some investment uncertainty, but escaped the most rigid layers of Brussels rule-making. That freedom has not been fully used, yet the direction of travel differs from the continent’s.
Germany’s weak performance is largely self-inflicted, energy policy choices raised industrial costs, while dense regulation and slow permitting weighed on its export-oriented model. France and Italy carry high public spending, rigid labour markets and layers of national plus EU rules that raise the cost of experimentation. Adding another tier of directives to already heavily regulated economies crowds out investment and innovation through compliance and risk aversion.
The EU’s growth has been subdued for years relative to the US and parts of Asia. Chronic underperformance on productivity, digital adoption and capital formation stems from the cumulative weight of regulation, energy costs and a preference for bureaucracy over dynamism. Reforms that simplify rules, and reduce the regulatory burden on firms would matter more for European prosperity than further integration.
Leaving the single market carried real costs, particularly for goods exporters. Yet the data also shows that membership was never a free lunch for growth. Britain’s relative performance since 2016 is a reminder that sovereignty over regulation is not automatically a handicap, and that the bigger constraint for the major European economies remains the bureaucratic and policy environment they share. The EU was a fantastic idea that turned into a bureaucratic caricature of itself. Long-overdue reforms must be implemented, or the EU won’t survive in its current form. The only problem is, bureaucrats don’t implement reforms that eliminate their own jobs.
Jonathan Roberts retweeted
Merkel's Germany will always be a great of example of what not to do as a country.
Jonathan Roberts retweeted
Labour’s Leader of the Commons, Sir Alan Campbell, just declared in Parliament that any council shutting citizens out is "running scared of basic scrutiny."
He accidentally described Andy Burnham’s Manchester machine to perfection.
Over £900 million in public property loans hidden from view, "lost" financial viability files, emails to elected councillors secretly blocked twice, and two formal dossiers sitting completely unanswered on Angela Rayner's desk since June.
Labour loves lecturing the country about transparency when it targets rival councils. The exact second anyone asks where nearly a billion pounds of public cash went in Burnham’s own backyard, every single file vanishes behind a brick wall.
