When jobs get automated through technology, the displacement causes upheaval, but eventually most of the affected people move to other areas of employment. If you automate people, then there is no other work.
In the future, new jobs we can't yet imagine will be created, but AI will be able to do those jobs better than any human can retrain. There is a fundamental difference with this change that we are not talking about enough; we are attempting to replace intelligence. That encapsulates logic, planning, learning, reasoning, the whole human gambit. We are attempting to create something which is on par with humans at a cognitive level and eventually surpasses it. This isn't so much a new technology but an attempt to create our general ability as humans.
From a job's perspective, AI won't just replace certain jobs; it will replace humans themselves.
History is littered with examples of inflection points where we fall into these new paradigm shifts rather than plan towards them, which usually ends up causing extreme hardship for the majority. We can't afford to wait until time horizons narrow enough that actions are reactive, but instead, we need to be proactive now.
Replying to @dbrinker001
Bragging that you can beat a bot built in under an hour isn't really a brag. These aren't the droids you're looking for . . . .
Replying to @dbrinker001
I don't think I have ever read a worse take on this platform lol. Have a read of who is your villian xitter.cf/danipolymath/status/21…
fun fact about myself is that I grew up playing online poker. my closest friend became a professional heads up player and i became a founder.
many years ago, when libratus and later pluribus released, me and 3 friends (2 programmers and a top rated professional poker player) spent a month on this problem. we rented a flat, studied and researched, and we had so much fun!
i have many stories about the life of professional poker players. from the age of 17 to 21 i visited a lot of poker houses, which is basically the same concept as a hacker house but instead of coding everyone is playing online poker and learning from each other. in fact there are many things in common! my friend had a poker player accelerator, similar to YC but for poker, where you would be given money and taught for 3 months and later on you’d share profits.
another fun fact is they had gpus and bought data, so they could study how to play gto (game theory optimal). my friends would pay 50k for datasets of other professional poker players. the world hasn’t changed that much if you are doing state of the art!
another anecdote i remember is that the best player amongst my friends had a random digital dice in his laptop giving a new number every hand he played. he used it to slightly modify his behavior towards more passiveness or aggressiveness, because he acknowledged that even if he was one of the best players in the world, the best players (human or ai) could detect his patterns if he didn’t introduce external non biased inputs in his decision making!
i can tell you that being a founder is very very similar to becoming a top rated poker player! hard work, iq and risk taking
anyway, have fun young players! may the odds be with you
Replying to @riskizo @businessbarista
This post can't be real? Honestly if you are an engineer and you need to be shown this, you would be the first out the door.
Replying to @altantutar
When radial tires were invented, they lasted four times longer than older tires. However, because the consumer demand for tires is finite, people did not suddenly drive four times more so tire factories ultimately needed a fraction of the workers to supply the market - Bill Gates
Replying to @tekbog
Working class people digging out other working class people. Storytime, these companies are not your fucking friends.
Replying to @bufferhead_
People repeating this rhetoric 4 coding seem increasingly out of touch There was certainly a time when the hype far exceeded these systems, but that isn't the case anymore. At this point, it sounds like you're judging the technology based on experiences from a couple of years ago
Replying to @zachcoelius
Any new jobs/industries that come along have no moat around them from AI. xitter.cf/JustAnAlgorithm/status…
When jobs get automated through technology, the displacement causes upheaval, but eventually most of the affected people move to other areas of employment. If you automate people, then there is no other work.
In the future, new jobs we can't yet imagine will be created, but AI will be able to do those jobs better than any human can retrain. There is a fundamental difference with this change that we are not talking about enough; we are attempting to replace intelligence. That encapsulates logic, planning, learning, reasoning, the whole human gambit. We are attempting to create something which is on par with humans at a cognitive level and eventually surpasses it. This isn't so much a new technology but an attempt to create our general ability as humans.
From a job's perspective, AI won't just replace certain jobs; it will replace humans themselves.
History is littered with examples of inflection points where we fall into these new paradigm shifts rather than plan towards them, which usually ends up causing extreme hardship for the majority. We can't afford to wait until time horizons narrow enough that actions are reactive, but instead, we need to be proactive now.
Replying to @MalcolmMcVein @IrishUnity
If you're working class and complain about inequality, you're just jealous. If you're middle class, you're cosplaying as working class. If you're rich, you're a hypocrite. It is almost like the system protects itself by the supidity of people like you.
Replying to @pokerclipsx
Replying to @goodalexander
Why do I feel like this is all rearranging the chairs on the titantic. The systems we will very likely have in 2-5 years will made all of this completely pointless.
Replying to @mcuban
This only matters if you care about some anthropological relationship with 'your' model. Any IP or input you think is valuable won't be as they get smarter.
Some serious cognitive dissonance going on to own two Teslas. He may be an awful human but what can you do, he makes great cars, wtf
Replying to @thomasjeans @TimSweeneyEpic
The problem is augmentation is a prelude to substitution, as shown by centaur-chess, for a while humans+AI could do better by working together, eventually people found most of the performance was increasingly coming from the AI and the humans were a hindrance if anything.
Replying to @Amanda_Goodall
How is this cleaning up after AI models? The models pointed out the vulnerabilities, they didn't casue them. What a ridiculous anti-AI framing that makes no sense.
Replying to @scaling01
fyi when you add 'incredibly' before cooked you change the slang meaning entirely.
Replying to @_sholtodouglas
Decline has largely been a youth turn away from tech, I am not sure adding AI to the bus model is the way to turn things around.
Replying to @xbtnoah
Great video about his whole run in this tournament. youtube.com/watch?v=xXJM9Rtb…



