I love how I took the original and edited it, then Thaddeus, then others and its going back and forth 🤣 hilarious
Literally. Who tf starts a war months out of an election??
Pope LEO appointed Archbishop of Vienna calls for ordination of women... where is his scolding? Nope, won't come.
El arzobispo de Viena dice en la radio pública que desearía la ordenación de mujeres
infovaticana.com/2026/11/03/…
Catholics, what do we say about this?
Archbishop of Vienna calls for ordination of women.
SCANDAL: Pope Leo-appointed Archbishop of Vienna supports the "ordination of women," wishing for it but calling a council decision unrealistic for now.
Archbishop Grünwidl is also pushing for the abolition of priestly celibacy.
lifesitenews.com/news/leo-ap…
More than Halloween, today is #ReformationDay
An annual remembrance that Luther and all the Reformers would believe that all the Protestants and Evangelicals today are heretics, and would advocate for your torture and executions.
They would want nothing to do with your pro-abortion skittle & women lead ministries.
Exactly, how Protestants reply to Orthodox are pasted arguments meant for Roman Catholics.
The Canon is a good example of this. Protestants are obsessed with it because its a major part of the RC-Prot debate.
The definition of the very word "canon" is different for us. We dont define it as a list of books that must be physically put together. We define it as the books that we read from in the Liturgy, and then tier them within the single category. Its more abstract the lower you go in tier. Even Prots admit that the Gospels are more authoritative than James for instance. Even many Prot Bibles contain the Apocrypha. "But just because its physically in the Book doesnt mean its included in the canon!" Uhhhh, exactly.... idiots.
So when we say we have one canon, they, like @JPuncut and @KellyPowersBPA call us liars. But they are just ignorant of the differences and totally unqualified to be talking to us. Totally unqualified to be talking to EO. And they dont hold themselves to their same standard.
Thank you @Craig_Truglia and @Alex_Ortodoxie for the stream!
A better treat than any of this commerically poisonous Trick or Treat candy for sure
Justin Phoster retweeted
Going LIVE at 4:30pm Eastern time with mega chad @Craig_Truglia to discuss his recent debate with @HwsEleutheroi and an historical perspective on icon veneration.
“CRAIG TRUGLIA explains ICON VENERATION and his debate with James White…”
(Link below)
EARLY CHURCH ICON OF MARY,
Catacombs of Priscilla, 200-220AD
1st MILLENIUM BYZANTINE ICON
Still used today by Orthodox
⭐️ Show this to anyone who says Icons weren't in the Early Church
ITS THE SAME CHURCH!
NOT the Church of Prots & Evangelicals
Justin Phoster retweeted
man there sure are a lot of horror movies about scientists accidentally opening portals to hell haha glad none of that is real right guys
Justin Phoster retweeted
Replying to @CatholicRadTrad
Actually no, when RCC accepted Nicea 2's canons, they accepted literally all of Trullos. Trullan canons were on the books until 1917 for the RCC.
In my research for today, I found and read about this Irish-derived Liturgical Document used in the Celtic Orthodox Church. This is the page I found (it was hard reading the Latin font but I did it) showing the 2nd page of the Nicene Creed.
This is a manuscript of a document that actually spans centuries. I read one scholar that suggested its a copy of the oldest Celtic Orthodox Liturgy. But that's debated. This particular Manuscript was written in the 780s. Much of the wording is abbreviated Latin, my guess is to save space on the page.
On the 10th line, it reads "dominum & vivificantem qui ex patre procedit" which means "Lord and Giver of life, who proceeds from the Father"
Above the word Patre in the margins, you can see someone added a note. That note says "FilA. p.cedit." An 'A' abbreviation means "-que" in medieval Latin. So it means "Filioque procedit."
That's right. Latin Monks in England took a manuscript copied from an Ancient Celtic Orthodox Liturgy, and molested it with heresy by writing the filioque in the margins. Disgusting. Its debated when this was inserted, some scholars say just 20 years after this copy was made, some say a hundred years after. But it's irrelevant, really.
I bet the Monk who inserted that was a real Papist TradCatBro 100%
This also shows they knew the Creed originally didnt have filioque, and the Celtic Church preserved the Orthodox faith as St. Bede asserted, and they were making every effort to insert this heresy any chance they got.






















