Karen Sem

ICYMI This man has sold his soul to pharma.

Why "virus" testing is a fraud: I run an ISO-accredited food science lab with NINE mass-spec instruments, microbiology testing equipment, aflatoxin testing, dioxin testing, heavy metals testing, pesticide testing, and more. I can buy a physical external standard of any of these things: A vial of lead at a given concentration, a vial of glyphosate, an isolate of aflatoxin chemicals, a purified sample of e.coli, etc. Yet as far as I can tell there is NO ISOLATED REFERENCE STANDARD available for any virus. I've tried to buy them to use as reference materials. As far as I can tell, they don't exist. The so-called standards labeled "isolates" are not isolates, and they are mixed with things like bovine blood serum, derived sometimes from human snot and spit, or mixed with elements of eggs, or swine blood, and more. I have yet to spot anyone selling a vial of, for example, lyophilized, purified, isolated SARS-CoV-2 or even this year's so-called "influenza strain." If the industry can't sell me an isolated, purified sample of a virus, that's a huge red flag and it begs the question: How is anybody calibrating their "virus detecting" instruments? If they have no real, physical viruses to test against, how do they know their tests are real? The shocking answer: They download DIGITAL LIBRARIES and compare sequencing output with digital profiles provided to them by either instrument manufacturers or government-sponsored "science" groups. So it's actually the companies that make the instruments and the libraries that tell you "it's a virus." Actually, all they've spotted is peptides because you can't even use mass spec to measure a full "virus" because the claimed virus doesn't survive the sample prep and the introduction into the instrument. So they use a statistical scoring technique and software "deconvolution" algorithms to arrive at a SCORE, and if that score is over a certain threshold, they claim to have spotted a "virus." As you can readily see, this entire process is highly prone to bullshit and fraud, since there's no physical virus sample to compare anything to. It's just digital smoke and mirrors to propel an industry plandemic industry based on total fraud. When I run ICP-MS tests on lead or mercury, I can actually spot those atomic elements on the instrument detector. Yet there is no mass-spec "virus detector" instrument that directly detects a virus. Doesn't exist. The physics don't work. So they use libraries and statistical scoring to claim they've found a virus, while having no actual reference materials (called "CRMs in lab speak") to confirm anything at all. And even if that did work, they have no QUANT CALIBRATION CURVE, so they can't tell you how much mass of the "virus" was found. (For example, they can't say how many ng/ml of viruses are in your blood.) Which means there's no concentration calculation possible. And what means there's no way to determine a threshold of so-called "disease" from a virus. The whole virus-disease industry is a complete fraud. It's also why blood-based AIDS/HIV tests are a total fraud, too. All 100% theater to control the population through fear and fake junk science.

The car industry had a century to build an electric car people actually wanted. It didn’t. The aerospace industry had sixty years to make a rocket reusable. It didn’t. The telecom industry had decades to connect the billions it couldn’t profit from. It didn’t. One person looked at all three and started crossing them off. Reusable rockets that land themselves. Electric cars that outsell their gas-powered rivals. A satellite network that beams internet from orbit to any point on the planet. A platform where speech is no longer filtered through a handful of editors. A chip inside a human brain that lets a paralyzed person control a computer with their thoughts. And now a car that flies. Six companies. Six industries. Each one operating at the frontier of its field while feeding engineering, data, and capability back into the others. The rockets fund the satellites. The satellites fund the rockets. The cars train the robots. The AI runs them. The platform keeps the conversation free. The energy powers all of it. People keep waiting for him to fail. They have been waiting for twenty years. The rockets were supposed to explode. They land on boats. The cars were supposed to be toys. They outsell everyone. The satellites were supposed to be impossible. They connect six continents. The brain chip was supposed to be science fiction. It is inside a human skull right now. At some point the pattern stops being luck and starts being something the critics are not equipped to recognize. Not because they lack intelligence. Because the framework they use to judge what is possible was built inside the institutions that couldn’t do what he does. The conversation about Elon Musk has never been about Elon Musk. It has been about how uncomfortable it makes people to watch one person accomplish what entire industries organized themselves to attempt and never finished. History does not produce this combination often. The drive. The technical depth. The pain tolerance. The willingness to let the mission burn through everything else. And the insane ambition to attempt all of it at once. Every one of these technologies would have arrived eventually. Reusable rockets. Electric vehicles. Global connectivity. Brain interfaces. None of them violated the laws of physics. But eventually can mean fifty years. And fifty years is the difference between your grandchildren seeing it and you seeing it. The most overlooked thing Musk has done is not any single invention. It is how much of the future he pulled into the lifetimes of people who would have died before it arrived. Earth does not get many of these. And the people still betting against him are making the same mistake every industry made before he walked in and did the thing they said couldn’t be done.

A entrepreneurs new village. A place to build and a place to grow. We have 100s of rapidly abandoned malls across the US. Very few have a plan other than rot or a distribution center. But what if we can make them magnets to creative thinkers and builders? The best outcome would be to make this into apartments and worker spaces for entrepreneurs. This image below is a largely vacant concourse inside the Exton Square Mall in Pennsylvania. It can become a new place to keep talent local or even draw talent from far away. The conversation is not that complicated as most malls have ample plumbing and conversions to bedroom and kitchen is not difficult or costly. This entrepreneurs requirement would require the apartment holder to be in an active business that is in startup or active mode with clearly stated rules. Hundreds of companies can be incubated here with shared resources at the anchors. 3d printers, shops, etc can be held in the areas. Some anchor stores can serve as markets for products that make sense to sell to the general public. Some anchor stores can serve as places to hold events and seminars. Some can serve other functions for inventory, supplies and shipping. It ain’t perfect and I can already hear the comments some doomers have. And no the living spaces like many lofts in big cities will have no windows but the courtyard. Conduct codes would be higher and closer to a university housing rules than what would be otherwise normal. This is not life long housing. It is like anyone who has ever seen a person, usually young lives when they build, some live in literal closets. This said it absolutely will become a place of creativity and commerce any city would do anything to gain. A big plus would be a local college or university connection. I would have lived here instead of my car when I was starting out. So would just about any entrepreneur I’ve ever met. This is what we can build. And this really changes the world.

BREAKING NEWS THE UNITED STATES TREASURY IS CALLING FOR WORLD BANK REFORMS Here we go…