Cozy Pepe retweeted
I repeat, it is not a meme.
Dana White is flying to DC right now to meet with Trump on Monday.
Hear it in his own words.
Cozy Pepe retweeted
Sidney Powell Unleash The Kraken!!! 😎🔥🔥🔥 Justice Is Coming!!!! @SidneyPowell1 @saltinesnack
Cozy Pepe retweeted
Frens! I put out a few posts about this over the last few days and it seems many didn’t realize what I’m about to explain! I Believe Q is running the grey checkmark accounts on X, there's No Doubt in my mind!! IMO These are the New Q Boards!!! The White Hats are letting us know what is going on through these accounts! Pay attention, there’s a lot of comms to find, and they will continue to increase. 😎🐸
Here’s the difference between the checkmark colors on X:
Blue = pays for Premium
Gold = official business/organization (Premium Business)
Grey = government or multilateral official/organization
If you’re not aware, If you start to type in "Department of" and "Secretary" and "U.S." in the search bar on here you will see a bunch of the grey checkmark accounts in the drop-down list, you can go to each one and follow those, that will give you a start 😊 And then as you follow those pages and see what they post, you'll see they will tag other grey checkmark accounts in their posts acknowledging each other and then you can follow those too, and so on.
Stay Locked In, Patriots!! The Enemy has NO IDEA what is coming!!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Hope this helps!! 👊💖😎 WWG1WGA!!! 💜✨
Cozy Pepe retweeted
Q is a military intelligence dissemination program, authorized and repeatedly endorsed by the President of the United States.
For the first few years, it required a modest amount of brainpower to see the proof of this…
But now it’s 2025 and all you have to do is scroll down the President’s social media page.
Cozy Pepe retweeted
Communism is the most barbaric, evil ideology the world has ever seen.
Today and every day, we mourn the tens of millions of innocent men, women, and children slain at the hands of this wicked ideology.
Cozy Pepe retweeted
I am not a full Q believer.
I have the unfortunate brain of believing in very little in general. A "trust, but verify" brain. Too many aspects of Q I can't verify.
I will entertain the idea of Q, which to many binary thinkers makes me a a believer in Q. I AM NOT.
Q is very easy to dismiss when viewed selectively. Elements are fuzzy. Can be dismissed as either a ball of yarn for conspiracy theorists or as a pacification campaign for patriots. I can entertain those possibilities. We are cooked if those are real. I would rather not. I choose hope.
Unequivocally, Trump is both aware of Q and posting Q related things. This can't be denied, or dismissed as horoscopes, it can only be dismissed through selection bias. It's very easy to prove, he hung this Q painting by @KAGdrogo at Trump National Golf Club in Los Angeles. This to me means A, that Q is real or B, he is pandering to his "trust the plan" followers. The B option would be tremendously cynical and cruel. Trump has never to my knowledge been cruel for cruel sake. I lean toward entertaining A, that Q is real.
We are not privileged with the bare naked truth yet, we are not Trump, we do not know what he is thinking. We don't know the full scope of Q yet. However, it is insane if 10% of the drops are true after all. Biggest military operation in history in both scope and scale.
Trump behaves very arrogantly. Arrogant people are either delusional, fake, or confident in their competence. To me Trump is the latter, confident in his competence. Like Kobe, or Jordan. Not arrogant, confident and competent at a level most can't comprehend. Which also leads me to entertain Q as real. If Q is real, Trump and very few others know the full plan. Susie Wiles doesn't know, Hegseth doesn't know, JD Vance doesn't know, they are all compartmentalized to a degree. Siloed. You can't blame JD for his post election post if he is not privy to the full Q plan. This also justifies Trump's position about JD Vance's post. Trump knows JD doesn't know. JD also didn't fully distance, chastise, or throw Trump under the bus, he merely stated, without malice, the facts that are available to him now.
Pundits who have long dismissed Q will have egg on their face if Q is real. Nick Fuentes stating he helped Democrats win, will look presumptuous if Democrats stole the election and are fully caught. As will Robert Barnes and Tucker Carlson. I don't blame them for their stances. They only have part of the story and have dismissed Q years ago. If Q is real, they are merely doing their best to make sense of the tangible parts of the story today.
You know what though, pundits don't matter if Q is real, because if Trump starts putting voting fraudsters in jail they will all come around very quickly.
Panicans are justified only if Q is anything but what it shows itself to be. Can you blame them for wanting more action? You certainly can't blame them for grasping for solutions or pointing fingers after Texas turned blue.
If Q isn't real, we are absolutely cooked. Communism and the DSA will infect the USA into it's grave in less than a decade. For the Q isn't real panican crowd who think we can get a majority again in 8-10 years haven't workshopped all the ways communists will build moats around that ever becoming a possibility. From stacking Scotus, killing our thought leaders with impunity, censoring us on every platform available, to infinite illegals and stuffed ballots. Under the DSA the American dream is dead.
If Q is real, its far grander of an undertaking than even the Manhattan project. Trump will look like a magician, a war general, and saint all wrapped into one. Imagine being that and not being a touch arrogant. Imagine how hard it was not to spill that full plan to people over the last 10 years. Imagine how humble he will look in retrospect.
Q will go down as the inverse of stabbing Caesar in the back. America could actually thrive another 250 years.
Trump will be looked at greater than Washington as no one has ever pulled a civilization out from its collapse like this.
I choose to entertain Q as real.
Cozy Pepe retweeted
Why would anyone oppose a stable European security infrastructure to ensure lasting peace, cooperation and prosperity? 🕊️
The idea of discussing European-Russian security infrastructure is not simple, and it can be dangerous. I was very clear with all our partners: I think that first we have to discuss how to end Russia’s war against Ukraine. Secondly, what the security infrastructure will look like for Ukraine. What security guarantees will Ukraine have? And then, depending on these answers, the sides can discuss the security infrastructure between Europe – or between the EU – and Russia.
It’s dangerous when Russia wants to begin these discussions with a new security infrastructure in Europe. By the by, it's even more dangerous for the EU. We are not a member of the EU. We are not a member of NATO either. I am not trying to speak on their behalf. We all live in Europe. We don't want to have “Yalta 2.0.” We don't want to be divided by Russia.
From an interview with Jake Tapper on CNN. (1/3)

























