Disaster. Premium increases aside, everyone get your bets in on how many insurers pull their chairs back from the table, put their hands up and say "thanks, we're out."
San Francisco progressive Jane Kim is the apparent victor in California’s insurance commissioner race. She plans radical changes. sfchronicle.com/politics/art…
This is part of some CA student organization (calhstatransit.org) so don't get the vapors, but the info circle on the top right is of interest.
This is partly why I supported Yes On G, to stop this stuff before it gets past the whisper stage. You thought it ended with GH?
90% sure this guy is a troll, but in all my doorknocking for G there were two or three like this, believe it or not. Total contempt of any compromise and Yes On G were cucks *slam.*
Hope they're happy now? Anyone have a spare No On G sign I can drop on a doorstep or two?
Replying to @SelenaC10705
Well I believe we can do better than your volunteering efforts. Cars on the road NOW, no compromise.
Honestly what even was that? "compromise"? You start by giving the enemy what they want? NO.
I actually care about sunset families, unlike you.
Everyone needs to vote Yes On G-- *now*, but a quick shoutout to the No On G campaigners I met while working the Noe Valley and Alemany Farmers markets. They were very nice and we had some laughs while chatting up the same voters.
Don't let trolls get you down, the real world isn't like Twitter / X or Heaven help you, NextDoor.
The author of the piece below is the head of the Civic Joy Fund, which is sponsoring an acoustic hour at....Sunset Dunes tomorrow.
So it's not a shock, the position he took. Does anyone have a link on SFGate for a lengthy article arguing in *favor* of Prop G?
the historical parallel is real, but at the same time, both the Embarcadero and Central Freeway turned into slower-moving boulevards that still allowed car access, not entirely car-free spaces. they were also destroyed in the earthquake
sfgate.com/opinion/article/s…
Final stretch for Yes On G! While the No side files frivolous, desperate lawsuit appeals to drain resources and to try to invalidate G, we're taking the message to the people of SF.
Do your part, tell everyone to vote Yes, and donate at greathighwayforeveryone.com
Farewell Alemany Farmer's Market, we knew each other well these past weeks.
Now crunch time really begins. Pie fights on social media are enjoyable, but winning is even more so. Get a sign, donate and get out there, it's now or never.
Join at:
greathighwayforeveryone.com
So No On G is now resorting to lawfare, trying to invalidate the proposition by appealing the slapdown they got in August. Sign of desperation? So it seems.
What a pathetic maneuver. If lawfare isn't for you, Yes On G sends the message loud and clear.
With just 5 days left before the November election, the Great Highway Compromise faces another legal challenge from Lucas Lux. As a Google lawyer, he knows very well how expensive these lawsuits are.
Lucas Lux's nonprofit, Friends of Sunset Dunes, has submitted a notice of appeal today challenging the court ruling that allowed Great Highway Compromise, Prop G, onto the ballot.
San Francisco voters deserve to decide with a vote, but Lucas Lux doesn't like that ordinary people have a say this November.
Lucas Lux is still trying to keep the Great Highway Compromise off the November ballot.
Why now? Likely because Lucas Lux has more than $500,000 left to burn in the next 5 days.
YES on G volunteers are still knocking on doors citywide, speaking with neighbors, and putting up signs. Every legal battle adds another burden to an effort sustained by ordinary people giving what they can.
I'm voting YES on G to allow the public with weekday access for everyone while preserving car-free recreation on weekends and holidays. That's a fair share.
Working families and commuters deserve reliable transportation, and San Francisco deserves a Great Highway we can share. 2-mile asphalt is not the entire 50-acre park. Share and Compromise.
Vote YES on G.
What's a compromise? greathighwayforeveryone.com/
Need a window sign? docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
Follow the money. campaign.sfethics.org/electi…
**Yes On G Volunteer opportunities this weekend**
It's all hands on deck. If you support G, being on social media is well and good but you need to get out there as well.
Go to greathighwayforeveryone.com and sign up, we can put you to use in _your_ neighborhood this weekend.
Too busy? That's unforunate, this close to election day, but you can still donate and / or get a window sign, and tell your friends and neighbors about Prop G. You can still help.
Donate and get your sign here:
greathighwayforeveryone.com
If you didn't see my video from a few days ago regarding Sunset Dunes' amenities, here's a short clip summing up why a Yes On G vote will not "destroy" the park, as the scaremongers claim.
You can move stuff next to the existing (open 24/7) pedestrian path, as seen here:
Reposting this below.
Something to note-- Shipwreck Cove is 6,000 sq ft and being generous, let's say the skatepark is 15,000 sq ft.
That is less than 1% of Sunset Dunes' area. Some 'destruction' of the park, should Prop G pass. (Both can be moved, if desired.)
nitter.gq/LarryQ6/status/2115533…
The No On G campaign claims a Yes vote will 'destroy' the park.
What does that mean? What amenities are at risk? Can any be saved or moved?
Join me on a tour of Sunset Dunes' amenities, and stay to the end.
Please share this with anyone who is open-minded on Prop G.
Can someone help? I'm compiling a list of amenities along Sunset Dunes and beyond the skatepark and shipwreck cove, the latter constructed after Prop G went on the ballot, I'm hard pressed:
Hammocks
Phone booth
Pull-up bars
A few log benches
Nice octupus sculpture
What else?
@LuigiCPA @SelenaC10705












