Building my ark
left at Stoke
Joined June 2021
- Tweets7K
- Following4.3K
- Followers4.6K
- Likes32.7K
Pinned Tweet
Membership of the WEF should mean automatic disqualification from holding public office.
Was this the planned outcome from the start of this psy-op? What next? Care homes? Nursery schools? Hospital beds?
Turn left at Stoke retweeted
🚨 EXCLUSIVE: THE FINAL NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF BRITISH FREEDOM!
Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits.
You are probably still asleep after we knocked out the Mexicans last night, but you need to wake up to a terrifying new reality!
It has just leaked that Andy Burnham is quietly preparing to enforce strict new VPN restrictions to stop teenagers bypassing his under-16 social media ban. 🤡
They are trying to spin this as protecting the kids, but here is the absolute nightmare they are hiding from you.
You cannot restrict VPNs just for children.
To enforce this, the state will be forced to ban, monitor, or require a mandatory Digital ID check for every single VPN user in the United Kingdom.
They are literally building a state-controlled internet firewall, copying the exact digital prison models used by China and North Korea.
They want total control over what you are allowed to see, say, and access online so they can completely kill off independent free speech.
We are trading a failed Prime Minister for a high-tech socialist dictatorship.
RT to completely blow up the UK timeline and demand our freedom back! 🔁🇬🇧🔥
Increased state control is always introduced under the guise of being for our benefit. Imagine tweeting something they don't like. They'll be able to just switch you off.
A blatant attempt to present Farage as anti-establishment when in fact he is completely establishment.
The media has amplified left-wing protests in order to manufacture consent for the acceptance of banning protests. When the lockdown protests were on, there was radio-silence from the media. These are dark times.
They keep pushing population-reduction measures that are clearly not wanted by the population they aim to reduce. Funny that...
In what world can any local council worker be worth a salary like this? It is a transfer of wealth from us to weasels like this.
Turn left at Stoke retweeted
Digital ID didn’t just appear out of nowhere.
It didn’t start as control. It started as convenience.
Passports became machine-readable. National Insurance numbers became databases. Driving licences went digital. Banking moved online. Phones became wallets. Logins replaced signatures. Each step made sense on its own. Each step was sold as progress.
And that’s the point most people miss.
No single stage feels dangerous. It’s only when you zoom out that the picture becomes clear.
Digital ID is the final layer. Not a card. Not an app. A system. One identity that sits above work, money, travel, healthcare, benefits, online access and eventually permission itself. A single source of truth about who you are, what you’re allowed to do, and whether you’re compliant enough to do it.
Supporters say it will make life easier. And it probably will, at first. That’s always how these things work. Friction is removed. Queues disappear. Paperwork vanishes. But convenience always comes with a trade-off, and that trade-off is leverage.
Once identity becomes digital, access becomes conditional.
Your right to work. Your ability to move. Your access to services. All of it becomes something that can be granted, restricted, paused or revoked remotely. Not necessarily because you’ve committed a crime, but because you’ve fallen outside a policy, an algorithm, a rule set you never voted on and can’t appeal to in any meaningful way.
History shows us this pattern over and over again.
Systems built “for safety” expand. Emergency measures become permanent. Powers introduced for one reason quietly get repurposed for another. And once infrastructure exists, it will be used. Not by today’s government necessarily, but by the next one, or the one after that.
The question isn’t whether Digital ID will be abused.
The question is when, and by whom.
And more importantly, what happens when opting out is no longer an option.
This isn’t about paranoia. It’s about precedent. It’s about understanding how power works once it’s centralised and automated. It’s about recognising that a system capable of total oversight doesn’t need to be evil to be dangerous. It only needs to be efficient.
From my point of view, Digital ID is a fork in the road.
One path leads to a world where participation is permission-based, where freedom exists only inside systems you must constantly prove yourself to. The other path requires us to slow down, ask harder questions, and decide where the line actually is before it’s drawn for us.
Because once identity becomes a switch, freedom becomes something that can be turned off.
And history tells us that switches always get used.
The plan is to eradicate small businesses. They're an existential threat to the global technocracy system they're working towards.
First Charles, now Cliff. They clearly see midle-aged men as a vast, untapped market to peddle their poison to.
2
111
Part of a marketing campaign on behalf of Big Pharma. Get tested now! Translation: we're on a fishing expedition for new customers, because our old ones keep dying off.
Whether intended or not, this will speed up the de-dollarisation of the global economy. If you hold assets in dollars and you don't do as we want, you lose those assets. New global reserve currency incoming.
