Miscarriage of justice
United Kingdom
Joined April 2011
- Tweets30.7K
- Following1.1K
- Followers963
- Likes50K
L retweeted
Two biological men a day given trans surgery on NHS telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05…
L retweeted
Habibi is a brilliant account, run by an expert researcher who reports the truth about extremism in this country.
It often exposes how the state tolerates and even helps the extremists.
So no surprise that Byline Times has tried to smear Habibi and complain about the accountability it brings.
Byline Times specialises in pointing at shadows. It reported that Jason Arday was driven to his death by the far right. It employs a 9/11 truther.
And the author of the piece is Dan Evans, a convicted phone-hacking journalist. There is more.
Byline Times is controlled by the same people as Byline Networks - recently awarded more than a quarter of million pounds by Angela Rayner to “fund the future of local news.”
Please do follow Habibi and learn from its work.
L retweeted
OMG I’m going to have to go to bed now because if I hear anymore of this utter madness I’m not going to be able to sleep 🤦♀️
This government must have escaped from the same asylum 🤦♀️
They can’t be wired right 😳😳😳
L retweeted
Britain now has a de facto Islamic blasphemy law, largely thanks to the Government’s “anti-Muslim hostility” definition.
It is entirely reasonable to ask who helped shape it. Angela Rayner’s department has a lot of questions to answer.
Officials said responses to the consultation that helped shape the definition had been deleted. Only after the Free Speech Union threatened legal action did the department admit they had not.
When the department claimed the responses had been deleted, its top civil servant told Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy that no minister had ordered their deletion.
So who did?
Was it a civil servant or a political appointee? And what role did Angela Rayner’s special advisers play in what appears to be a serious cover-up at the heart of Government?
L retweeted
Remember when Stand Up to Racism physically attacked @RestoreBritain canvassers and attempted to shut down our democracy?
Well, now I'm the one being investigated by the police for simply defending myself. Two-tier Britain.
L retweeted
THE UK GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS TERRORISTS
This is not new news, but you should share this information with everyone you know.
Egypt can recognise a threat, the UK government and security services somehow cant?
The MAB (Muslim Association of Britain) are affiliates of the Muslim Botherhood.
The MAB were the ones who 'took over' the running of Finsbury Park mosque in London which was managed by Egyptian hook handed terrorist Abu Hamza.
The MAB took over the mosque with the blessing and help of the UK government and its security services.
This is the failure of successive governments in the UK. They literally allow the enemies of the West in, then they support them, they even place them in 'advisory' roles and give them tax payers money
The UK government even grants their affiliates money to operate freely in the UK. Literally paying them to subvert our nation, our democracy, our way of life.
Absolutely crazy stuff.
I've been exposing this for decades and yet somehow I'm the terrorist?
Go figure!!!
L retweeted
The amount of men pushing back on this is disgusting. Trying to make excuses on why a 30 year old should be able to have sex with a 16/17 year old. Gross.
There should be a staggered age of consent.
A 30, 40 or 50-year-old man or woman chasing after a 16-year-old is strange, inappropriate and, quite frankly, raises serious questions about their intentions. And before anyone jumps in with "but they're legal", that doesn't make it any less concerning.
A middle-aged adult is at a completely different stage of life to a 16-year-old. The difference in life experience, maturity, independence and understanding of relationships is huge. There is an obvious power imbalance, and we shouldn't just brush that aside because the younger person has reached the legal age of consent.
What exactly does a 40-year-old have in common with a 16-year-old? Why are they pursuing someone who has only just reached the legal age? Is it because they genuinely see them as an equal, or because they know they are young, inexperienced and potentially much easier to influence, manipulate and take advantage of?
And let's not pretend exploitation always involves force or physical violence. Grooming can involve attention, affection, gifts, promises and making a young person feel mature, special or loved. It can be a gradual process of building trust, pushing boundaries and manipulating someone's understanding of what is normal in a relationship.
A 16-year-old might genuinely believe they are making their own choices, but that doesn't mean they necessarily recognise the manipulation or understand the dynamics at play. That's exactly why the difference in age and power matters.
There is a massive difference between two teenagers of similar ages entering a relationship and a 40 or 50-year-old pursuing someone who has only just turned 16.
We need to stop treating the age of consent as though it gives adults a free pass to pursue teenagers, regardless of how old they are themselves. Just because something is legal doesn't mean it's right, healthy or free from exploitation.
The law should recognise that there is a difference between a young person being legally able to consent and being in a position where they are genuinely able to recognise and navigate the power imbalance that can come with an adult pursuing them.
L retweeted
To all the women caping for the right of men like this to enter women’s single-sex spaces, please explain why you care more about keeping him happy than you do about the women he’s threatening to punch. Extra points for explaining how your position is ‘real feminism.’
L retweeted
🚨🇺🇸🇪🇺 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST HUMILIATED VON DER LEYEN 🤣
“They’re buying oil and gas from Russia, while fighting Russia.”
“It was very EMBARRASSING to them when I found out about it, I can tell you that.”
Oh, I bet!
Have you ever seen Ursula von der Leyen this DEFEATED?👇
L retweeted
So they’re talking of a staged age of consent.
Yet for 50 years an army of state employees ignored 300,000 Muslim men raping English schoolgirls.
L retweeted
“We will beat you if you disrespect the prophet Mohammed.”
“I’ve disrespected the prophet before”
“Turn the camera off.” (So we can peacefully beat you to a pulp)
Islam is not compatible with the west.
L retweeted
FOLATE is naturally found in vegetables and is VITAMIN B9. Folic Acid is a manmade toxin produced by the same company who supplied BOVAER which was fed to Arla and Muller's dairy herds "to save our planet". That bovaer ended up in every bottle of supermarket own brand milk, cream, yoghurt & cheese produced by Arla & Muller's factories. Luckily Organic and other dairies refused to use it and remained independent, but the Govt appear to have prevented that with Folic Acid and ALL SUPERMARKETS HAVE COMPLIED INSTEAD OF FIGHTING ON BEHALF OF THEIR CUSTOMERS OR AT LEAST USING WARNING LABELS!! @marksandspencer @asda @tesco @aldiUK @Morrisons @sainsburys @LidlGB @coopuk @waitrose
L retweeted
Absolutely brilliant from the former Commander of the SAS.
Men who put their lives on the line for us - treated as criminals.
👇
It may seem (to some) to be a little ill-disciplined and impatient of me, but after 4 years of grinding process I’m increasingly convinced that the BBC Panorama and Ben Wallace-initiated Haddon Cave inquiry is less an exercise in “getting to the bottom of serious allegations” and much more of a damaging, hearsay-driven, prosecutorial, sensationalist, public relations exercise designed to protect the fragile political and professional reputations of the initiators.
And as for those so-called (not SAS) “special forces officers” (with typically zero real combat experience) that chose from the comfort of their operations rooms and Whitehall offices to express concerns, (or compile dossiers of hearsay reports) on the operational record of those that were tasked to crush the Brit-killing IED network…
Their crappy, limp-wristed approach to getting to grips with a perceived operational issue seems to me to be absent the qualities found in honourable, war-winning combat leaders (who would fly forward and spend time with the men) and much more characteristic of those politicized, ambitious, sweaty-palmed, shifty back-stabbers that creep around the corridors and up the back-channels in Whitehall…
To paraphrase Dostoyevsky: “Unable to rise through their own merits, they sought advancement through the destruction of another. Their bitter envy was even greater than their ambition, and their treachery greater than their courage.”
L retweeted
Someone just called me Islamophobic and I asked them to define exactly what that meant.
Is it someone that’s against the forced marriage of 9-year-old girls?
Someone that’s against r*pe?
Someone that’s against k!ll!ng gays and lesbians?
Someone that’s against the sanctioned beating of women?
Someone that’s against k!ll!ng non-believers?
Is it someone that’s against stoning, setting people on fire in cages, or beheadings?
Someone that’s against apostasy?
Someone that’s against Sharia law?
Someone that loves dogs and bacon?
1970’s Iran is screaming at us right now and our children will suffer greatly if we don’t heed history!
L retweeted
What is about to happen to Britain is truly INSANE.
Thanks to Andy Burnham's Labour, all kinds of community & "faith" groups will now be able to "sponsor" refugees who will be identified by ... the United Nations, which is not accountable to the British people and has no connection to our democracy.
A distant, unelected, unaccountable, and international group of woke bureaucrats will now wield enormous influence over our supposedly sovereign immigration policy here in Britain.
Those refugees will then automatically be given Indefinite Leave to Remain, including full access to housing, the NHS, medical and social services, and will almost certainly be able to bring in their relatives, too, such as the Gaza-born mother who recently brought a family of 18 into Britain under "human rights" laws.
Remember all those kebab shops and fraudulent businesses that were sponsoring visas for migrant workers during the Boriswave? Well, this is what we about to witness on an entirely new level with all those "community sponsors". Woke charities, foundations, mosques, secretive "faith groups" bringing in whoever they choose and then putting them in housing that, apparently, we do not have enough of for British people.
Ask yourself: do you really trust the British state to properly scrutinise these "community sponsors" when it cannot even control our own borders?
And remember all those credible studies showing how the Boriswave is about to impose a bill of roughly £600 BILLION on the British people? Well, expect that bill to get bigger and bigger because most of the people Labour will now bring in will be low-wage, low-skill migrants from the likes of Afghanistan and Gaza.
And what about the hardworking British people? Where are they in all this? They are once again being treated like second-class citizens in their own country, forced to live with a policy they never voted for, or asked for.
They will now end up having to subsidise yet more waves of migration including endless amounts of "chain migration" through family reunification.
The British people are generous and tolerant but enough is enough. They have already supported 400,000 refugees from Hong Kong & Ukraine, and provided billions in support for illegal migrants and Boriswave 'deliveroo' workers, who take more out of the economy than they put in.
Don't the British people deserve decent schools, hospitals, more prisons, and borders that work? Don't they deserve politicians who put them first before opening the door to yet more migration from radically different nations and cultures?
If you feel outraged by what is happening to your country then vote Reform. There is no other alternative. It was the Tories who ENDORSED the UN migration pact in the first place, and while Restore voters are right to feel angry they are dividing the Right and handing Labour the keys to the country for another five years.
If the broad patriotic majority does not consolidate and reject these changes then they will lose heavily and this policy will not just become permanent but it will utterly transform the country and its population.
L retweeted
Right. Half the replies I have had on protecting 16 to 18 year olds from being targetted sexually by fully grown men show exactly why these children need protecting from them.
Look at what half these mainly men have said back, would you want any of these middle age men near your 16/17 year old daughter or son?
