Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W) header
Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W) profile picture

most brands scream into the void. I build the system that makes your message impossible to ignore.

HookSpaβ„’
Joined May 2024
Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)Photo by Lett πŸ€ (@Letts_W)
new to the Hook Spa? here are the house rules. buzz is only permitted to amplify what is already true. ice is permitted to kill any line that needs β€œfuture of web3” to work. I turn their argument into a story the product can actually lead with. I fix pre-launch consumer web3 projects that are obsessed with the tech at the expense of their growth because if the tech is clearer than the "WHY," send a DM, I built the Spa just for you. πŸ€
4
3
53
1,045
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
"permissionless" is usually a feature the builders need. it does not concern a user because it is not a benefit the users feel. @topshot is a good example. people spent real money and never once thought about wallets, or the tek, or the chains. the story was the thing they already wanted. most teams here still write their pitch like we showed up ready to care about the infrastructure. sorry, but we didn’t.
7
4
1
14
308
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
buzz is seriously annoyed that ice removed three adjectives from her copy. ice is currently mad that buzz secretly added them back. lmao whereas I'm here struggling with productivity and a splitting headache well played "interns" πŸ₯²πŸ‘πŸΌ
πŸ€– Made with AI
9
1
15
238
"permissionless" is usually a feature the builders need. it does not concern a user because it is not a benefit the users feel. @topshot is a good example. people spent real money and never once thought about wallets, or the tek, or the chains. the story was the thing they already wanted. most teams here still write their pitch like we showed up ready to care about the infrastructure. sorry, but we didn’t.
7
4
1
14
308
buzz is seriously annoyed that ice removed three adjectives from her copy. ice is currently mad that buzz secretly added them back. lmao whereas I'm here struggling with productivity and a splitting headache well played "interns" πŸ₯²πŸ‘πŸΌ
πŸ€– Made with AI
9
1
15
238
I was talking about this thing sometime ago. this right here is the essence ai still misses and it is why I cannot fall for any ai sales video. until ai can replicate real human behavior β€” if it ever will β€” I'll stick to watching human ones. btw, this was a masterfully done promotional video. hiding marketing inside mockery is kinda smart.
I couldn’t stop laughing 😹😹😹😹
6
1
11
168
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
early-stage founders can explain their product to another founder. but can someone who has never touched crypto explain it back to you after 60–90 seconds on your site or X? try this: send a non-crypto friend (or even a crypto friend who isn’t in your category) your website + bio + pinned post. then ask them these four questions, in order: 1. what does this actually do? 2. who is it for? 3. what problem is it solving for that person? 4. why would someone choose this over whatever they already use? if they struggle on 1 or 2, the issue isn’t marketing yet. if they can answer 1 and 2 but not 3, you’re still leading with the solution before the problem is clear. if they answer 1–3 but 4 is just β€œit has better features” or a list of trend words, the differentiation isn’t landing. teams still skip this because they already understand the product too well. that’s exactly why the gap stays invisible until real users bounce. run the test before you write the next launch thread. the answers usually show the real positioning work still left to do.
3
4
9
117
does anyone even use this thing?
9
1
18
350
early-stage founders can explain their product to another founder. but can someone who has never touched crypto explain it back to you after 60–90 seconds on your site or X? try this: send a non-crypto friend (or even a crypto friend who isn’t in your category) your website + bio + pinned post. then ask them these four questions, in order: 1. what does this actually do? 2. who is it for? 3. what problem is it solving for that person? 4. why would someone choose this over whatever they already use? if they struggle on 1 or 2, the issue isn’t marketing yet. if they can answer 1 and 2 but not 3, you’re still leading with the solution before the problem is clear. if they answer 1–3 but 4 is just β€œit has better features” or a list of trend words, the differentiation isn’t landing. teams still skip this because they already understand the product too well. that’s exactly why the gap stays invisible until real users bounce. run the test before you write the next launch thread. the answers usually show the real positioning work still left to do.
3
4
9
117
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
losts of consumer web3 products still write the story as if the user is ready to change how they already live. that almost never works. people switch when the new thing fits a habit they already have, not when you ask them to build a new one. examples of the difference: ➀ meets an existing habit: β€œyou already check your phone when you finish a coffee. this wallet shows your balance and the one action that matters right now without making you open three apps.” ➀ demands a new habit: β€œdownload the app, create a new account, learn the interface, and start using it every day so you can participate in the future of finance.” ➀ meets an existing habit: β€œyou already share what you’re working on with friends. this creator platform turns that into something they can actually use or own without extra steps.” ➀ demands a new habit: β€œjoin the community, complete weekly quests, and earn points so you stay engaged with the ecosystem.” the first versions start from something the person is already doing. the second versions start from what you need them to do. if your current messaging only works once the user has already decided to become β€œa web3 user,” you’re still asking them to do the hard part before they’ve felt any reason to care. answer this: can you describe the product by pointing at a habit or frustration they already recognize, instead of describing a new behavior they need to adopt?
2
3
9
117
losts of consumer web3 products still write the story as if the user is ready to change how they already live. that almost never works. people switch when the new thing fits a habit they already have, not when you ask them to build a new one. examples of the difference: ➀ meets an existing habit: β€œyou already check your phone when you finish a coffee. this wallet shows your balance and the one action that matters right now without making you open three apps.” ➀ demands a new habit: β€œdownload the app, create a new account, learn the interface, and start using it every day so you can participate in the future of finance.” ➀ meets an existing habit: β€œyou already share what you’re working on with friends. this creator platform turns that into something they can actually use or own without extra steps.” ➀ demands a new habit: β€œjoin the community, complete weekly quests, and earn points so you stay engaged with the ecosystem.” the first versions start from something the person is already doing. the second versions start from what you need them to do. if your current messaging only works once the user has already decided to become β€œa web3 user,” you’re still asking them to do the hard part before they’ve felt any reason to care. answer this: can you describe the product by pointing at a habit or frustration they already recognize, instead of describing a new behavior they need to adopt?
2
3
9
117
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
Good ideas deserve to be heard. Tweet about what you wish existed onchain, tag us and @TapeOutWorld, and stand a chance to win 2K USDT. Ends Nov 17. Submit here: bit.ly/4eQxFIH
74
49
46
269
31,658
you people will: - pay for discounted X premium sub - get gifted - screenshot the notif then come here and post "there are still good people on X. thank you for the gift" but bro, YOU paid for it.
26
1
34
668
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
I just obliterated one of the crypto apps i use off my phone. the app was fine. actually, it was good. but atm, it was just occupying precious storage. that's exactly why it had to go. when three apps promise the same solution, your brain stops seeing tools and starts seeing clutter. i removed the one that didn't scream "priority" and kept the ones that did. now the million-dollar question for the builders out there: if your app is functionally "okay" but strategically invisible, can a tighter brand narrative save you from the digital trash bin? or are you already dead the second a user starts comparing you to the competition?
2
1
10
129
I just obliterated one of the crypto apps i use off my phone. the app was fine. actually, it was good. but atm, it was just occupying precious storage. that's exactly why it had to go. when three apps promise the same solution, your brain stops seeing tools and starts seeing clutter. i removed the one that didn't scream "priority" and kept the ones that did. now the million-dollar question for the builders out there: if your app is functionally "okay" but strategically invisible, can a tighter brand narrative save you from the digital trash bin? or are you already dead the second a user starts comparing you to the competition?
2
1
10
129
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
how do you know if your current story is actually building something, or just sounding like every other project? obviously a lot of early-stage founders can explain the features. they can even explain why they care. the harder test is whether a normal person would feel any reason to care once the hype language is stripped out. if the story still works when you remove the trend words, congrats, you’re prolly building something real. if it collapses without them, it’s still mostly extraction. that’s the difference between a narrative that creates participation and one that just sounds familiar.
6
2
19
203
how do you know if your current story is actually building something, or just sounding like every other project? obviously a lot of early-stage founders can explain the features. they can even explain why they care. the harder test is whether a normal person would feel any reason to care once the hype language is stripped out. if the story still works when you remove the trend words, congrats, you’re prolly building something real. if it collapses without them, it’s still mostly extraction. that’s the difference between a narrative that creates participation and one that just sounds familiar.
6
2
19
203
10,000 random impressions mean nothing. that may be true for accounts like us who prioritize conversion over vanity metrics. some creators optimize their accounts and build towards becoming "influencers"... and those numbers work for them. personally tho, gimme 10 conversations w people who need my service.
10,000 random impressions mean nothing. 10 conversations with people who actually need your product can change your business. would you rather have 100k impressions or 10 paying customers?
4
12
158
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
B2C founders will fight you over a $3k fee for a strategic job like it's their last dime. but those same people watch creators walk away with over $5k from one video contest. stop pretending you value growth when you're actually just obsessed with control. which one is it?
4
2
12
215
Lett πŸ€ retweeted
I FOUND A CRYPTO CARD THAT'S ACTUALLY FREE. βœ“ $0 card issuance βœ“ $0 annual fee βœ“ $0 top-ups Most crypto cards charge you before you even make your first payment. With @utorgcom, these fees are $0. It's also a self-custody crypto card and wallet, so your crypto stays yours. Multiwallet is coming soon, with separate wallets for salary, spending and savings. You'll also be able to earn yield on your USDC. How much could you save over a year? Link to the zero-fee card in the comments πŸ‘‡
84
15
2
189
15,713
B2C founders will fight you over a $3k fee for a strategic job like it's their last dime. but those same people watch creators walk away with over $5k from one video contest. stop pretending you value growth when you're actually just obsessed with control. which one is it?
4
2
12
215