Physics and CS professor @DavidsonCollege. Computational scientist. AI/ML for nuclear physics and sometimes HEP. Mediocre runner/dancer. (she/her)

Davidson, NC
Joined April 2015
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @jjkqae
Physics professor!
22
He’s army too! He wanted to dress up but thus was my suggestion 😊
10
Replying to @worldwidshouldr
Heyyy this is me and my husband!! Love this!He is a huge army too. Downloaded twt again when I heard about this post. So cool!
18
This actually made me lol, because, fair?
I will never get over how AI/ML people use the word “inference”
2
487
Interesting #APSapril meeting mini-symposium on Applications of Advanced Statistics and ML Methods in Nuclear and Particle Physics in Sacramento, CA kicked off by an excellent overview on recent ML advances in the field by @MKizzyy from @DavidsonCollege meetings.aps.org/Meeting/APR…
1
11
987
Replying to @thomasgwong
I’ve enjoyed McIntyre
3
187
We've seen some worrisome patterns in the way that members of the press engage with women in tech, the questions they ask and the angles they take. Being proactive folks, we've created a 🤗guide to make sure that doesn't happen! linkedin.com/pulse/rules-pre…
6
48
8
197
103,123
Michelle Kuchera retweeted
🧵 The historic NYT v. @OpenAI lawsuit filed this morning, as broken down by me, an IP and AI lawyer, general counsel, and longtime tech person and enthusiast. Tl;dr - It's the best case yet alleging that generative AI is copyright infringement. Thread. 👇
318
3,819
727
15,479
5,279,039
Michelle Kuchera retweeted
Partial list: 1. Transparency about what is actually in OAI models/datasets (ht @BlancheMinerva) 2. Azure cloud contract transparency--who's licensing GPT, for what use, how much $ 3. Transparency on training/calibration (RLHF etc) costs, w details on labor process + worker pay
what would you like openai to build/fix in 2024?
16
66
4
336
57,449
Michelle Kuchera retweeted
Whoa, impressed by this strongly worded letter from science committee leaders to @NIST & @WHOSTP about the due diligence required for us to properly evaluate AI systems in deployment. "Evaluations...cannot be based on speculation or.. unsound research" science.house.gov/press-rele…
6
49
201
31,836
Replying to @ZhongboK
Congratulations! I hope you have time without work after deadlines are past ☺️
2
214
Found a kindred spirit at #icml2023 #feelthelearn
21
340
56
2,765
295,495
Replying to @BasicScienceSav
Yayy!! Was waiting for this announcement!
2
44
Replying to @BasicScienceSav
I say yes. I’m definitely on the more inclusive side of authorship, I will invite anyone who worked on the project to be a coauthor.
1
188
Replying to @SushiAarushi
YOU WILL HAVE THE BEST TIME!!!! So excited for youuuu
44
When your attribution in a talk comes with a ❤️ after your name. 🥰❤️🥰
1
6
457