nami (@MONOFlCATION) header
nami (@MONOFlCATION) profile picture

We ARE killing ourselves for africa

25
Joined July 2021
Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)Photo by nami (@MONOFlCATION)
Replying to @MONOFlCATION
2
178
Clocked i messed something important up at work 😶‍🌫️
8
It’s easy to take Jane Austen for granted because we live in the world that she created. We struggle to see how groundbreaking and innovative her novels are because they set the template for all modern fiction. Pride & Prejudice, to cite the most obvious example, did more than invent a genre. Anyone who now writes a story in which two people fall in love is either inspired by her or reacting against her. She’s like Tolkien in that sense. But she did much more than that. She perfected a method of narration known as “free indirect discourse” that’s now used by virtually every writer. You have only to read the novels of pre-Austen writers to see what a tremendous difference she made through her use of this technique. Literary scholar John Mullan argues that Emma launched a revolution in form & technique that’s comparable to the innovations of Joyce and Proust. It is the favorite novel of Susanna Clarke and of Katherine Rundell, who calls it “a book that shows as much of the sweep of the human heart, of fear, love, morality, untruth, foolery and triumph as a Shakespearean drama.” It is also, arguably, the novel that invented the mystery genre, having what J. K. Rowling has called the biggest twist in literature. You don’t notice the greatness of Austen for the same reason a fish doesn’t know that it lives in water.
I've read Pride and Prejudice and to this day I have no idea what the hell people see in it. It's not a bad book but I don't see it as being much beyond a glorified romcom. Pointing out foibles? Yeah, every half-decent writer does that. So what is Austen so good at? Liz Bennet hates her mother and thinks her father, while well meaning, is an idiot (Austen doesn't seem to consider there to be anything wrong with any of that). Then there's Mr. Collins the clergyman whom the girls dislike despite his status in life. Okay, no one's entitled to someone else's romantic love but what great insights does the book contain on that? What about any of this is supposed to be so impressive? Dickens would handle a failed courtship more efficiently and entertainingly. Just compare with Mr. Stryver's attempt at marrying Lucie Manette in A Tale of Two Cities.
55
563
34
5,181
149,549
He thinks we wont jump him
“This is the least important competition for us.” 🤔 Chelsea manager Xabi Alonso after being eliminated from the Carabao Cup 😳
16
And im not watching thtabfucking united game
12
I acc dont know what i expect from these fucking idiots
8
SELL HIM JANUARY I
6
I FUCKING HATE FOFANA
1
41
THESE FUCKING KIDS
9
Im 5 pens away from joining the xabi out peeps
15
God save me. I hope these idiots have practiced their pens
4
What is barco playing at genuinely
39
Morgan again….
7
ALONSO YOU ARE A DONKEY
16
Where the tf is estevao
42
that was the chnace ffs
8
Rogers really cant play without palmer and jp. Wtf
11
Barco keeps giving bombs to his teammates
20