Litigation Attorney at the National Jewish Advocacy Center.
📌 Panama City/Bogota
Joined July 2025
- Tweets322
- Following29
- Followers270
- Likes114
Pinned Tweet
A federal court in California just ruled favorably for our client @Avaddov in our antisemitism suit against Pokemon, permitting the case to advance for all nine causes of action. You can read the ruling here:
lnkd.in/p/eH9nx_kE
James, on behalf of all Zionists, I am thanking you from the bottom of my heart for generating so much business for our cause today. As a small token of our appreciation, I have planted a tree in Israel in your honor. You are a true friend of Zionism. Same time next week?
Greek Cypriots would like a word with you. @grok, how many Greeks Cypriots were dispossessed of their homes due to the Turkish invasion?
Americans have joined the global world & woken up to the actions of these vile people. How dare they think it’s great to steal someone else’s home.
1
116
Wrong. Israel was re-established in 140 BCE by the Hasmonean Dynasty. The Hasmoneans embodied "traditional Judaism" by definition, being more than 2,000 years old. The Messiah had not arrived. Therefore, traditional Judaism does not require the Messiah to re-establish Israel.
Zionism is not a 3,000-year old tradition, Adam. It in fact defies traditional Judaism, which prohibits the re-establishment of a Jewish state until the Messiah arrives.
These posts are revealing however. This is some weird psychological thing for you masquerading as "indigenous politics."
72
@grok, prior to Muhammad's conquest of Mecca, was the kaaba controlled by another religious group? Did Muhammad usurp control? Did he and his men do anything to the non-Islamic religious items at the kaaba?
1
85
El-Sayed belongs to a branch of Islam that believes the most moral person to have ever existed presided over the mass beheading of hundreds of Jewish men and the distribution of that tribe's women as sex slaves. But besides that, a true friend of the Jews.
I suppose we’re going to have to litigate this same question for the next 6 years but there’s no evidence that Abdul El-Sayed is antisemitic. No one’s been able to offer any said evidence. Unless you consider criticism of Israel to be anti-Semitic (which apparently a lot of people do!)
123
Let's be honest. You aren't boycotting anything food related. You'd raid Bibi's Zionist fridge if you could.
No one is targeting businesses because they are Jewish!!!
This has everything to do with being Zionist and actively supporting the genocide in Palestine whether physically, ideologically, or materially!
Y’all are dumb as fuck!
2
163
@grok, from the first Knesset to present, tell me every single Israeli-Arab who has been part of a ruling coalition, and would you say someone who suggests an Israeli-Arab was never part of a government is deeply misinformed?
The Israeli elections are a total sham, with racism against Palestinians at its core.
The 1948 Palestinians will never be allowed to join a government.
And the 1967 Palestinians in the West Bank are not allowed to vote - despite the fact Israel rules over them via its military and without consent.
1
185
You call public executions a "spectacle." Are you suggesting ideologies that utilize public executions, and otherwise strongly advocate for the death penalty, are barbaric?
There's no denying Mr Ewert committed egregious acts of violence against women that landed him in prison more than four decades ago which still have impacts today and there are some legitimate concerns about his time at McGill, which are currently being investigated.
As you read the room and the comments here on X and elsewhere, and refer to "the only good violence, is the violent agreement 99% of us" have "on this issue" (anonymous posters and bots included), are death threats of the kind reported below part of the "good violence" you have in mind?
You get the responses to posts like this one you've just made in your notifications and I'd suggest that "judging by the comments" we haven't made much progress in this country since the spectacle of public executions was abolished more than 150 years ago. The spectacle has just evolved.
Keep up the posts Dr Garber, especially the one's where you mention my daughters while you lecture about what constitutes "socially acceptable thought".
globalnews.ca/news/12121716/…
161
@grok, if you had to choose between sending your child to Stanford Law School or any of the law schools in Cairo, and you cared most about quality of education and prestige, where would you send your child?
I went to law school mostly in Paris and a bit in Cairo, both of which taught be to debate with my knowledge of the law and actual sources, not with Wikipedia and AI, unlike whatever garbage taught you to do that.
Nice dodge btw 😊
1
3
255
@grok are General Assembly resolutions as such legally binding on U.N. members? This guy seems to think the United States and China agreed to allow Tonga and Papua New Guinea to team up with others, form a majority, and impose binding law on them.
I think you are talking about what your grandfathers did to Papua. Israel just takes notes from you people. Also, what is your immigration status in the United States?
@grok, identify for me every time, or at least the first 15 times, Jews take over land by force in the Torah.
Actually, no.
Zionism is about 130 years old.
No Jewish text or teaching before that time was about taking over the Land of Israel by force and taking it from other people.
That is not a Jewish value. Our religion never proposed or suggested that.
Zionism, a modern, political ideology, arose as a rebellion against religion.
1
1
155
@grok what are the first documented instances of violence between Jews and Arabs in the land that became Israel-Palestine following the first aliyah?
Also tell me about massacres against Jews prior to Zionism there.
Perhaps you should take a stroll down to the history department of your university and argue Stalin defeating Nazi Germany doesn't count because he once struck a deal with them.
unavailable
1
66
This is your typical "international law professor." I see the memo has gone out. @grok, explain to this person that the "right of resistance" general assembly resolutions are not legally binding on Israel nor is Protocol I.
unavailable
1
4
103
What a dumb question. Israel soldiers are in the West Bank because the Palestinians literally told them they could be there.
@grok per the Oslo Accords, did the Palestinian Authority agree that Israeli troops would be permitted in the West Bank?
What were the soldiers doing in the occupied West Bank? Should they have been there, Brad? What is this depraved schtick you’re peddling?
1
1
69
Not a joke at all. They're wrong. Explain to me why those territories are "occupied" and Be'er Sheva is not. Don't inundate me. Go one at a time. Show me specifically where and when the definition of what territory qualifies as occupied changed in the intervening years.
Easy. There is no "occupation." Even if there were, it is not illegal and Israel has not consented to any right to "resist occupation." Total absence of any relevant treaty ratification or opinio juris and state practice.
Explain how the killing of two soldiers manning a checkpoint as a part of an illegal military occupation was a “criminal act” please
1
2
205