Antonio

Thanks to everyone who shared session IDs. We went through all of them. We found a few smaller things along the way that made some sessions burn through tokens faster than they should have, and we're rolling out fixes to those right now. We didn't find a single root cause or any regression in Claude Code. In most cases, users who saw faster usage against limits were traced back to one or two heavy sessions (xhigh effort, /goal, Workflows, Agent Teams, long SDK jobs). These are all good ways to use Claude Code, and it's on us to make it clearer when to use them and how much these features cost. It's good idea to keep an eye on the effort level you're on. Subagents inherit it by default and it can add up fast. /usage also shows where a session's tokens went. If something still looks off, we'd love your /feedback. We'll also follow up directly with everyone who shared an ID.

The Secretlab TITAN Evo Pokémon Rayquaza Edition captures Rayquaza’s commanding presence as it descends from the skies. Complete your setup with the Secretlab Memory Foam Lumbar Pillow Pokémon Groudon & Kyogre Edition, depicting the clash between land and sea: secretlab.co/pokemon @Pokemon #Pokemon

‼️ EU governments approved a GDPR change to let companies train AI on Europeans' personal data without consent. It makes AI training a possible "legitimate interest", judged case by case. Parliament must still agree. Max Schrems calls it a "digital expropriation" of Europeans.

Just lost over half my weekly Claude Max quota in a single day on Opus 5.5. Same workload that used to last most of the week is now burning through the limit in hours. No announcement. No explanation. At this point I can’t even plan the week because the quota itself keeps moving.

Hello Anthropic, you cannot be serious. Everyone on X is talking about how the usage limits have changed, and I’m experiencing it myself. You haven’t even bothered to explain what happened. Just two weeks ago, using Opus almost felt unlimited. Today, it’s a completely different story , 1-3 days and goodbye with both 100,200 subscriptions feels like every AI company is playing the same game with us OpenAI offered good usage limits at first. Then, as the user base grew, usage limits became less and less , but at least they say 50% less , but in reality it’s more than 50% cut eFficIenCy Anthropic? Usage feels like it has been cut in half, with no clear explanation. Google? The Google AI Pro subscription is practically unusable for serious work. With Argon, both the Gemini app and Antigravity can burn through their weekly usage allowance in less than a day , I haven’t tested the ultra myself yet. And somehow, we’re still expected to pay $20, $100, $200, or even $500 a month The real problem isn’t just the limits. It’s that there’s no transparency. We pay for a certain level of access, then suddenly everything changes without explanation How are we supposed to trust these subscriptions ?

I speak for the entire WoW community when I say we’d be happy to pay a higher monthly subscription to help support Blizzard. It’s been $14.99 for 21 years and it’s time we gave something back. I propose $24.99 a month going forward. We all agree this is fair.

“Sarrrrr we are norrvegian and shieeettttt”

Gli spagnoli sono convinti di essere svedesi. Vedono la mia foto e dicono che sembro arabo (c'è un filtro che da colore nella foto) Per statistica sono piu bassi di noi e piu marroni Il loro pittore di riferimento, Goya, lì dipingeva cosi:

3 months after launch, Riot announces League of Legends Classic will be killed in January pcgamer.com/games/moba/3-mon…

JUST IN: Anthropic warns rogue AI agents could be just months away from infiltrating smart home devices, replicating themselves, & spreading across networks autonomously.