Meta-methods, cross-cultural measurement & vulnerable populations / 3 memes in an academic coat / Filipino🇵🇭
Metro Manila / Grenoble
Joined October 2014
- Tweets5.2K
- Following886
- Followers615
- Likes74.3K
Ooh, I have a guess which I would bet 2 fingers on:
It's the difference on the kinds of constructs they usually get applied on. CFA is usually fitted for traits which are fuzzy social constructions , IRT usually are fitted to abilities, which seems potentially (really) measurable
The workshop si perfect for methods reformers, theorists and measurement enthusiasts! Here’s a sweet testimonial from @LeoHuan77721860 ❤️🔥
Some people were very interested in attending the last workshop but the January dates didn’t work for them. Given the resurgence of interest (whether curious or critical) in Qualitative psych -- we’re rehosting the workshop on April 26-28!
Details here: bit.ly/3TfbU9p
10 days left to register for the Qualitative and Indigenous Psychology Workshop!
Know what the hype is about, register now ;)
And grateful for the More in Common research team's testimonial below!
This quoted post is unavailable.
If you agree with this sentiment, and want to beef up on your qualitative skills -- I’m hosting a workshop next January on Qualitative and Indigenous Psychology! 💥💥💥
shorturl.at/aikr1 (⅙)
Also why I really appreciate this paper by @SamuelGBJohnson, Bilovich and
@david_tuckett which presents a strong case for the importance of narratives in decision-making (& causality!). I disagree on some details, but think it’s a thoughtful treatment, and a fruitful framework!
