I'm a Certified Automation Service Provider™ and I help entrepreneurs grow their business by automating their systems and processes.
Minot, ND
Joined January 2009
- Tweets8.9K
- Following235
- Followers1.9K
- Likes1.1K
Nice tool. I think most people assume that if Google can read your website then the LLMs can read it as well.
Imagine ranking on the top of Google and your website still having poor visibility in the LLMs?
This is a great way to figure out if the technical set up of your site is the problem.
Over the years, I’ve used various tools, Chrome extensions, and (obviously) the browser itself to diagnose JavaScript-related SEO issues. But now with AI search, I’ve found myself needing a quick and easy way to check if a page’s JS setup is “LLM-friendly” - so I built a tool myself.
My “LLM Content Visibility Scanner” shows you what (non-Google) AI crawlers like GPTBot (ChatGPT), ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot actually see when they look at your page, without executing JavaScript (the way most LLM bots fetch content.)
Just paste a URL and it quickly audits the raw HTML for client-side rendering issues, missing structured data, paywalls, alt text gaps, and crawlability problems.
It then hands you a prioritized mini-action plan with specific URLs to address, plus some other metadata information.
Note: there are some known limitations listed at the bottom, so the tool isn’t always 100% perfect. And it’s certainly not meant to serve as a replacement for a proper technical SEO audit. But it’s a good starting point and a quick tool to use for this purpose when you’re on the go.
Let me know what you think and feel free to DM me any feedback/bugs you might encounter!
algorythmic.co/llm-content-v…
52
Claude finally has design and it looks good.
claude.ai/design
@IMJustinBrooke I have a weekend project.
1
1
241
A 5-step Gemini trick reverse-engineers any image you love into a perfect AI prompt, and most solo business owners have no idea it exists.
Here's a surefire way to create great images with AI just do this:
Step 1: Find a picture or stock image you like somewhere.
Step 2: Upload the image to Gemini and use this prompt provided below.
Step 3: Make modification to the response that Gemini gives you to be closer to what you want.
Step 4: Use the modified prompt to create a new image.
Step 5: Tweak and repeat.
Here is the Prompt: Breakdown this image by the following:
1. Shot/Photo Type
2. Subject + Action
3. Environment
4. Color Scheme
5. Camera/Lens
6. Composition
7. Mood/Emotion
8. Lighting
9. Textures
10. Details/Modifiers
164
Mical Johnson, CASP™ retweeted
Wow. Something interesting was just brought to my attention regarding self-promotional listicles: in some cases, they may actually be *against the law,* according to FTC rules that took effect in October 2024.
There is already precedent for this: A few years back, a company was sued for publishing hundreds of fake "best of" review pages that ranked their own services #1, included fabricated reviews of competitors whose products had never been used, and posted fake reviews on third-party platforms. The BBB eventually censured the company for unsubstantiated claims. (Note: I am being vague/anonymous on purpose 👀 )
This case took place before the FTC formalized these prohibitions, so the legal exposure today would presumably be much worse.
I've been researching and writing about self-promotional listicles for months - the "Best [X] Companies" and "Top 10 [Y] Tools" pages where the publishing company ranks itself #1. This has arguably become the most popular GEO tactic over the last year or two because it has worked (surprisingly well) to influence SEO & GEO results.
In my articles about this, I've been approaching this as a potential search quality problem. But it turns out the FTC's Consumer Review Rule (16 CFR Part 465) explicitly prohibits several practices that are common in these pages:
* Creating a company-controlled site that presents itself as providing independent reviews (§465.6)
* Publishing reviews of products or services you've never actually used (§465.2)
* Attributing reviews to people who didn't write them (§465.2(a))
And the penalties? Up to $53,088 PER VIOLATION. Plus, each page could be a separate violation (!!)
The FTC issued its first enforcement warning letters under this rule in December 2025 to 10 companies.
One way to interpret this for SEOs/GEOs: if your client (or your agency) is publishing "best of" listicles that rank themselves #1 based on scores they made up, about products or competitors they never used, on a site that looks like an independent review authority... that's not just a Google quality guidelines issue anymore. It's a potential legal liability.
Based on FTC guidance, the line appears relatively straightforward: you can *absolutely publish comparison content that includes your own product.* Just be honest about who you are and don't fabricate reviews of products or competitors you've never used. (BTW, this part is recommended in Google's Reviews guidelines as well.)
That said, this might be tricky for most of these listicles, given that the author almost never actually tried and tested competitor products; usually they're just doing research based on publicly available data about the company.
I used Claude to put together a quick reference table (see image below) breaking down what's legal and what's not under the FTC rule.
(BTW, I’m not a lawyer and this isn’t legal advice; just my interpretation of the FTC’s published rules. If you’re doing this at scale, it’s worth checking with legal counsel.)
Very interesting research. I will definitely look more into this
🚨 Chinese researchers just published a paper that destroys every AI agent startup pitch deck.
It's called ROME + ALE, and it exposes why every "AI agent company" you've heard of is building on quicksand.
Here's what nobody's talking about:
2
24
He’s the real deal it will be interesting to see if he can pull it off
I’m going to pay someone $1,000…
But ONLY if this doesn’t work!
In 4 days I’m hosting a weekend-long livestream event. Right here on this profile.
January 9th - 11th (breaks for sleep and church).
GOAL: Build 3 completely different businesses in 3 days using AI and it must make a combined $1,000 or else I’ll pay $1,000 to someone live.
This is a free event.
No registration or opt-in needed. Though, you may want to follow and turn on notifications 🤷♂️
You will learn:
- AI market research
- AI copywriting
- AI web design
- Vibe coding
- Head to head model testing
- Building AI agents
Business 1:
An agency that uses an AI agent to do the work for the clients
Business 2:
A course business made entirely by AI, may even make an AI clone of myself to teach it (if possible to stream that)
Business 3:
SaaS business (iOS app) built by AI and marketed by AI
But if it doesn’t make any money, someone in the crowd will!
Why do all this???
My secret agenda is that this will give me an epic amount of recorded content to kickstart my new AgentSkills YT channel.
Make sure you’re following @agentskills_ai so you don’t miss any of this. Maybe even turn on notifications since the algorithm is kinda wonky.
✌️❤️
Now enjoy this intentionally SLOP-ified thumbnail image…
3
35
I think we are going to see more of this in the next year.
blog.google/technology/safet…
2
42
This data isn’t surprising but I am curious about a couple things.
1. Are people leaving Google or just using Google differently?
2. With the paid CTRs going down as well, has the cost in paid gone up during that time period significantly as well?
@wilreynolds any data on this?
We updated our CTR study analyzing impact of AIO presence on CTRs it's not looking good
Jan 24 ➡️ Sep 25
2.68% ➡️ 1.62% - Organic CTR (No AIO)
1.41% ➡️ .61% - Organic CTR (AIO)
23.07%➡️13.04% - Paid CTR (No AIO)
8.76% ➡️6.34% - Paid CTR (AIO)
seerinteractive.com/insights…
1
44
Love the breakdown in this article.
People excited to jump into AI in your company are likely using the wrong tool for the job, it's part of the journey...here's several examples of people internally asking for "help with AI" when they shouldn't have been using AI in the first place. They are eager, luckily we have folks who help guide that eagerness. Who is helping guide your nacent & eager AI newbies helping them pick the right tool for the job?
seerinteractive.com/insights…
30
I think I'll be doing more of this using @mindstudioai
I have a lot of little tasks like this that I'm doing all the time.
We think @godofprompt is a smart guy with smart ideas.
But we added a little of our own sauce to Alex's idea.
In just 2 minutes we turned his ChatGPT prompt into a fully autonomous AI agent that runs 7 days a week.
💪🤖
1
35
This is big. I really could have used this for a recent project.
Google Analytics has an MCP server!
We can now ask about GA4 data with natural language with an LLM.
youtu.be/PT4wGPxWiRQ?si=l5S-…
github.com/googleanalytics/g…
19
What @wilreynolds says here is the most understated soft skill. Every successful business owner has this in spades.
You can call it what ever you want resourcefulness, persistence, driven but at the end of the day that person is a problem solver. We need more people like this.
Too many people are out here leaving the future of their ability to put food on the table to "company policy" or "company training" on AI.
Too many resumes I'm seeing have no AI experience, or it is so basic that the person isn't going to be helpful, or it is buzzwords that someone can't explain the value driven. The future state when the tech gets better.
I'm still seeing way too much "My company won't let me upload our data" and not enough of this energy:
My company won't let me upload our data, so I said F that, worked with a non profit and uploaded their data (that's how I started this whole business, was in a dead end corporate job, saw my skills atrophy and started optimizing non profits to keep my skills sharp).
My company won't let me upload our data, so I said F that, asked ChatGPT and made synthetic data, and learned the skills to build XYZ tools.
"My company won't get me a developer so I didn't get to do X" vs:
My company won't get me a developer so I hired someone on Fiverr.
My company won't get me a developer so I learned how to build a prototype using Replit, wanna see it?
We need more lets me show you what I built and the value it could create, less I'm awesome, look at these big brands I worked with or here's the budget I managed.
28
Mical Johnson, CASP™ retweeted
Combine your AI Overview Data with your paid search data to build the 1 chart that lets you turn analysis into strategy and priority in your next meeting.
I truly feel like the simplicity of this chart makes it easy to have several conversations.
1️⃣ - KW themes with HIGH % of AI Overviews & LOW Conversion Rates
Medium Impact: these words convert lower, yet they possess high AI Overview penetration.
2️⃣ - KW themes with HIGH % of AI Overviews & HIGH Conversion Rates
Big Impact: any keyword themes in this quadrant will make challenging for you to drive conversions, full stop. AIOs are highly visible on high-converting keywords, I would start looking at other ways to gain value in this area.
3️⃣ - KW themes with LOW % of AI Overviews and LOW Conversion Rates
Low Impact: While there are not a few AIOs present, which is advantageous, these words also do not drive meaningful conversions.
4️⃣ - Keyword themes with Low % of AI Overviews and HIGH Conversion Rates
Go All In: With low AIO overview penetration, your ads and organic results will get clicks AND you have a high likelihood of converting these visitors.
Would love any thoughts / pushback, etc.
I know that in PMAX I would have less data, but we play with the hand we're dealt here :)
seerinteractive.com/insights…
Mical Johnson, CASP™ retweeted
We're all getting asked questions about projections to SEO and AI, we're playing with a sheet that would help have those convos, what would you want to see - my target is execs.
This is the simplest version, you fill in how much you believe SEO traffic with drop this year and next year and how much you think AI traffic will increase this year and next year.
That's it, the chart gets built.
You basically put in your 2023 and 2024 data by quarter as a starting point, then you'll see your current trends then you can play with expected 2025, 2026 and see how far off you were from your predictions?
I think with so little data accessible we gotta start making some educated predictions and be ok standing behind it those educated predictions / assumptions.
