Carmelite Monastery

You claim to be opposed to Judaism, yet you promote Donald Sanborn (who believes that souls can be saved in Judaism and in other non-Christian religions, which is a heresy). Do you also hold that souls can be saved in non-Christian religions? If not, why do you promote groups that believe in that heresy? Further, you claimed that our position on baptism and salvation is condemned by the Church. No, you’re totally wrong. Your position is actually contrary to Catholic teaching. Do you want to have an all cross examination debate about the salvation and baptism issue? Also, do you hold that Leo XIV is the pope or not? If not, why do you identify people like Gideon Lazar and E. Michael Jones as Catholics who should be supported? Lazar not only holds that John Paul II is a saint but promotes heresies on the Jews.

Hello. Our material explains all of this. The post-Vatican II claimants to the Papacy are not valid popes but heretical antipopes. The Church teaches that heretics cannot be validly elected. The Vatican II Sect is the prophesied end-times Counter Church. You need to become a traditional Catholic. See this video and our other videos: nitter.gq/mhfmvc/status/20438325…

Yet he regards the apostate Antipope John Paul II as a saint, who taught that very thing. He also maintained communion with Antipope Francis, who explicitly taught that heresy. Sarah is a heretic. nitter.gq/mhfmvc/status/20416333…

He has always liked a notorious anti-Catholic heretic who claims that all who adhere to Catholic teaching on the doctrine of God are idolaters. That's because Nick Fuentes is an evil heretic. See our material for the full truth. nitter.gq/mhfmvc/status/20770881…

Watch this video and see our material for the truth: nitter.gq/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

You are such a liar. You totally misrepresent our position. We recognize and state explicitly that the American form of government is not the ideal form of government. However, as Pope Leo XIII taught: Pope Leo XIII, Longinqua (#6), Jan. 6, 1895: "But, moreover (a fact which it gives pleasure to acknowledge), thanks are due to the equity of the laws which obtain in America and to the customs of the well-ordered Republic. For the Church amongst you, unopposed by the Constitution and government of your nation, fettered by no hostile legislation, protected against violence by the common laws and the impartiality of the tribunals, is free to live and act without hindrance." Your lie about our position is an example of how you are dishonest and not of the truth. That's why you are a Vatican II Sect heretic. By the way, your sect teaches the condemned heresy that religious liberty should be a civil right in every rightly ordered society.

No, liar, the citation is absolutely relevant; for in it Pope Leo XIII expresses the very position on America that we hold – a position that you blatantly misrepresented and condemned. The pope does not describe the laws of America as you do, but as we do. Your argument is also specious because it’s not contrary to the natural law for Catholics in this country to appeal to the Establishment Clause to ensure their own freedom to operate, evangelize and profess the true religion in the country. That’s how the Establishment Clause functions with regard to true Catholics. Further, the State can, in certain situations, tolerate false religions in order to avoid greater evils (such as the loss of Catholics’ opportunity to evangelize). This is the express teaching of Leo XIII in Libertas, but you might not know this since you are apparently recently out of atheism. Pope Leo XIII, Libertas (#33), June 20, 1888: “For this reason, while not conceding any right to anything save what is true and honest, she does not forbid public authority to tolerate what is at variance with truth and justice, for the sake of avoiding some greater evil, or of obtaining or preserving some greater good. God Himself in His providence, though infinitely good and powerful, permits evil to exist in the world, partly that greater good may not be impeded, and partly that greater evil may not ensue. In the government of States it is not forbidden to imitate the Ruler of the world; and, as the authority of man is powerless to prevent every evil, it has (as St. Augustine says) to overlook and leave unpunished many things which are punished, and rightly, by Divine Providence.” So you have not only blatantly lied about our position, but you have failed to make the proper distinctions. Also, it is not rash, but correct for us to conclude that you lied about our position and that you were not just ignorant. You purport to be familiar with our material and this is a matter that we’ve addressed repeatedly. Further, only dishonest people would pervert our comment the way that you did. It’s also remarkable that a Vatican II Sect member such as yourself is making such (false) arguments when your antipopes are rabid promoters of the heresy that religious liberty must be recognized in every society (among many other heresies). Your hypocrisy is stunning.

Yet he and his group hold the heresy that Jews and Muslims can be saved without believing in Christ, directly contrary to many definitive papal statements and dogmatic definitions.

So a “total Groyper victory” is putting people in power who support open borders, abortion up to birth, overregulation, attacks on the First and Second Amendments, huge taxes, leftist judges, an anti-Christian cultural agenda, persecution of conservatives (which will only become more aggressive), socialism, a massive bureaucratic machine full of cronyism and endless fraud, sellout to China and Ukraine, crackdown on American energy independence, and more. You people are satanic fools and in mortal sin. (By the way, the liar Fuentes also declared a "total Groyper victory" when Trump and the Republicans won in 2024.)

“St. Vincent De Paul” And Albany “LGBT Catholic Churches” Exposed (New Video) youtube.com/watch?v=1h5nFlqp…

Exactly. Nick Fuentes is a tool of Satan who cares about his own self-promotion. He hates God, the truth and the country. Anyone who promotes or agrees with him is foolish.

Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed - And Why He Was “Silenced” (New Video) youtube.com/watch?v=gjfrn1ww…

CMRI Supporter Blatantly Denies Defined Dogma In this clip a CMRI supporter blatantly denies the Catholic Church’s defined dogma on salvation. He explicitly states that they’re not saying that all Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus are damned and that “we don’t know” if such people are saved. Well, the Church has already settled this issue. It has dogmatically defined that all who die as Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus (i.e. as pagans) are lost (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino”) and that the Catholic faith is required for salvation. People like him are simply not Catholic, even though they purport to be staunch traditionalists when they aren’t. This is also why such heretical groups (and the heretical rogue priests who lead them into heresy) have such an animosity toward true Catholics who actually believe in the Church’s teaching on salvation and baptism. “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino”, 1441)

16th Century Theologian: Pope St. Siricius & St. Gregory Nazianzen Rejected “Baptism Of Desire” Fr. Juan de Maldonado was a Spanish Jesuit theologian who died in 1583.  He admitted that Pope St. Siricius and important Church father St. Gregory Nazianzen (who is named the Theologian) rejected “baptism of desire”.  The fact that they rejected “baptism of desire” is obvious to any honest person who reads what Pope St. Siricius and St. Gregory actually wrote on the matter.  However, many John 3:5 mockers are so dishonest that they won’t even admit that Pope St. Siricius and St. Gregory the Theologian denied “baptism of desire”.  Hence, a statement from a theologian who acknowledged this is noteworthy.  Note that Maldonado presumes that the aforementioned individuals believed that martyrdom could replace baptism, but there’s no proof for his assertion and his statement on this point can be disregarded.  The Church’s teaching demonstrates that all the martyrs in Heaven received the Sacrament of  Baptism (see Pope Benedict XII, Benedictus Deus) and that no one is saved without rebirth of water and the Spirit.  See our video: 2,000 Years Of Infallible Papal Teaching On Baptism’s Absolute Necessity. Fr. Juan Maldonado, Opera varia theologica, Vol. 1, 1677 (De Baptismo, Q. 4), p. 59: “Among the ancients there were some who insisted on baptism itself so strictly that they thought everyone perished who died either unbaptized or not by a martyr’s death.  Of this opinion was the author of the book On Ecclesiastical Doctrines, chapter 74: ‘We do not believe that a catechumen has life, even if he died in good works.’  So also Pope [Siricius] in his letter to the bishop of Tarragona, and Gregory of Nazianzus in the oration on holy baptism [Oration 40].” Also, it wasn’t just Pope St. Siricius (in his decree to Himerius) and St. Gregory the Theologian who rejected “baptism of desire”.  The early Church itself did, as we showed in the aforementioned video by citing Pope St. Leo the Great, Pope St. Zosimus, and more.

Joe Heschmeyer (“Shameless Popery”) Confronted By Bro. Peter Dimond About Vatican II - New Video youtube.com/watch?v=PVeCJ9Q2…

You really have no idea what you are talking about. This video covers in detail the shocking things that John Paul II said about Assisi and the (false) religions that were represented there. By defending the abomination of Assisi, you implicate yourself in mortal sin and idolatry. John Paul II blasphemously taught that all the pagans and idol worshippers at Assisi actually worshipped God and that their prayer was necessary and inspired by the Holy Spirit. You are heretical and totally deceived. nitter.gq/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

Are you actually calling him a saint? If so, that's a mortal sin and a denial of the Catholic faith. See our recent video on Assisi for many other shocking things Antipope John Paul II said about it and about the false religions represented there. nitter.gq/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

“St. Paul The Apostle” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed (New Video) This is one of the worst Vatican II Sect churches in the country. youtube.com/watch?v=vVNOpizf…

He’s not the pope, but an apostate antipope, as our material explains.

Every pope in history recognized that the death penalty is acceptable for certain crimes. Leo XIV is not a pope but a notorious heretic and an antipope, as our material explains. nitter.gq/mhfmvc/status/21090100…