mr.NoProblem

The table shows quarterly returns (%) of $ELON from 2021 → 2025. 2021 Q4 was insane → +2,650% 🤯 2022 was brutal overall → all red until a tiny bounce in Q4 (+5.68%). 2023 saw recovery → Q1 strong (+16.91%), but again Q2/Q3 red; then Q4 saved the year with +36.42%. 2024 continued the Q4 magic → even after huge Q2 losses (-52.7%), Q4 pumped +43.59%. 2025 so far → Q1-Q3 are red The pattern is clear: Q4 has historically been Dogelon Mars’ comeback quarter. #DogelonMars $ETH #ETH $BTC

Here’s what the screenshot says about Wintermute’s $ELON market-making in 2021–2022 (both in and out flows, all wallets, top 6 counterparties): Total flow shown ≈ $515.4M across 16,129 tx. Uniswap dominated activity by count and was the single biggest venue by notional: Uniswap: $273.5M (≈53% of volume), 13,882 tx (≈86% of tx). Avg size ≈ $19.7k/tx → lots of small, frequent on-chain trades; classic HFT/arb/liquidity maintenance on the DEX. Centralized venues carried nearly half the notional in far fewer, larger clips; consistent with inventory rebalancing: Cryptocom: $129.8M, 849 tx, avg ≈ $153k/tx KuCoin: $40.0M, 571 tx, avg ≈ $70k/tx. Gate: $25.6M, 331 tx, avg ≈ $77k/tx. Poloniex: $23.3M, 304 tx, avg ≈ $76.7k/tx. Gemini: $23.25M, 192 tx, avg ≈ $121k/tx. Pattern fits a cross-venue MM: Uniswap likely served as the price-discovery/hedging rail with many small swaps; CEXs handled chunkier deposits/withdrawals to rebalance books or meet liquidity obligations. Liquidity footprint: Uniswap was the primary surface where retail faced the book/pool; Cryptocom was the top CEX corridor for size. Turnover vs. exposure: Because this counts in + out, it measures churn, not net buy/sell. You can’t infer positioning or PnL—only where effort and flow were concentrated. #DogelonMars $ETH #ETH $BTC

Following the @DogelonMars × @wintermute_t partnership announcement, on-chain activity suggests market-making setup is underway. (screens below) What we’re seeing: • Wintermute Deposit → Wintermute Hot Wallet: 4.929T $ELON ($694k) • Subsequent deposits to CEXes in ~$100k tranches: OKX, KuCoin, Gate • Tiny “test” txs (e.g., ~$5–$10) + a small inbound from Gate → Wintermute hot wallet Why this matters: that pattern—seed hot wallet → fund exchanges → test connectivity—matches typical MM onboarding to tighten spreads and deepen books. Community thoughts: • Are you noticing tighter spreads / deeper 1–2% depth on OKX/KuCoin/Gate? • Have you spotted additional Wintermute-linked wallets $ELON? • Any other on-chain tells we should track? Not financial advice, just analysis. #DogelonMars $ETH #ETH $BTC

🚀 The launch of #DogelonMars (ELON) on Ethereum is a textbook case of how meme coins bootstrapped liquidity in the DeFi summer era. Here’s a breakdown of what happened and why it still matters today: 1️⃣ Minting Supply The deployer created 1 quadrillion ELON. This was the total token supply minted into existence. 2️⃣ Distribution -500 trillion $ELON was sent to Vitalik Buterin’s public wallet (as was common among meme projects like SHIB & AKITA). -500 trillion was set aside for liquidity. 3️⃣ Uniswap Liquidity Creation (V2) The deployer paired 500T ELON with 40 ETH and deposited it into Uniswap V2. This created the first ELON/ETH trading pool. In return, the deployer received 141M LP tokens (representing ownership of that pool). 4️⃣ Burning LP Tokens 🔥 Instead of keeping them, the deployer burned all LP tokens (sent them to the dead address). This permanently locked the initial 40 ETH + 500T ELON inside the pool. Result: the liquidity could never be rug-pulled or withdrawn. 5️⃣ How Liquidity Works in V2 In Uniswap v2, liquidity is spread across the entire price curve (0 → ∞). That means this pool will always provide liquidity at any price, unlike Uniswap v3 which uses ranges. As traders buy ELON, ETH flows into the pool and ELON flows out, shifting price upwards. When they sell, the opposite happens. Arbitrage traders constantly rebalance the reserves, ensuring the value of ELON ≈ value of ETH in the pool. 6️⃣ Growth Over Time At launch: just 40 ETH (~$182k) + 500T ELON. Today: the pool holds ~59.5T ELON + 1,528 ETH, worth ~$7M per side. This growth comes from new liquidity providers adding funds and from price appreciation of ELON. The deployer’s original contribution remains locked forever, but new LPs can still add and remove liquidity. This combination of scarcity, transparency, and permanent liquidity is why ELON managed to survive beyond its hype-driven launch and build an active trading ecosystem. #Crypto $ETH #ETH $BTC