✝️ ex-Democrat turned sane person
Joined August 2021
- Tweets94.1K
- Following8.3K
- Followers124K
- Likes85.8K
Pinned Tweet
“…that she’d been literally gang raped while intoxicated by five men at a fraternity house…”
This is WILD. This is a sitting governor robbing 7 men of their right to due process.
Natalie Jean Beisner retweeted
Candace says it’s “Epstein coded” and sick to support public executions.
She then pulls out an old clip of Charlie to support her position—all while either not knowing he eventually changed his mind (because see, they weren’t actually friends) or simply not caring and wiling to misrepresent Charlie and lie to her audience.
That’s weird.
Here’s Charlie just two years ago talking about how executions should be public, quick, and televised. He even suggests selling tickets and allowing kids of a certain age to watch.
Tucker and Candace both did segments excoriating President Trump for suggesting we’d livestream the military execution of the Fort Hood terrorist.
And yet, neither of them know or care what their “friend” Charlie believed.
And remember this clip when other bad actors share older clips of Charlie before he’d changed his mind on the death penalty.
You don’t have to agree with Charlie’s, but you don’t get to use him as a political pawn or remake his legacy and what he actually believed.
And if you think Charlie was a good and decent man, then maybe don’t mock the rest of us who agree with his take here.
Candace says it’s “Epstein coded” and sick to support public executions.
She then pulls out an old clip of Charlie to support her position—all while either not knowing he eventually changed his mind (because see, they weren’t actually friends) or simply not caring and wiling to misrepresent Charlie and lie to her audience.
That’s weird.
Here’s Charlie just two years ago talking about how executions should be public, quick, and televised. He even suggests selling tickets and allowing kids of a certain age to watch.
Tucker and Candace both did segments excoriating President Trump for suggesting we’d livestream the military execution of the Fort Hood terrorist.
And yet, neither of them know or care what their “friend” Charlie believed.
And remember this clip when other bad actors share older clips of Charlie before he’d changed his mind on the death penalty.
You don’t have to agree with Charlie’s, but you don’t get to use him as a political pawn or remake his legacy and what he actually believed.
And if you think Charlie was a good and decent man, then maybe don’t mock the rest of us who agree with his take here.
Charlie Kirk on the death penalty: “If someone were to murder me, they already murdered themself in that action. They already bestowed the punishment upon themselves; we are simply completing the task…It’s not fair to the victims [to not enact the death penalty for murderers]. You are cheapening the lives of the victims. You are basically saying the victims did, and you get to live.”
Recorded August 2025, less than one month before his murder
Piers Morgan gets into a heated back and forth with Yishai Fleisher, a man he calls a “settler spokesman,” over his (Yishai’s) refusal to answer whether Israel has nuclear weapons.
I do think it’s weird that a straight answer can’t just be given, especially if it’s globally recognized as an open “secret.” Not security details, description, and number. Just a straight answer.
Natalie Jean Beisner retweeted
With all the admiration and respect so many had for Charlie's intellect, acumen and instincts, I will never understand how they could attack his choice of Erika.
He spoke eloquently about the critical value of finding your spouse, both Biblically and practically.
How do they square that?
Charlie Kirk on why he changed his mind on the death penalty: “If you allow murderers to live, it’s an insult to the victim… ‘If you take a life, your life shall be taken.’ And that’s what changed my mind. As I studied the Torah, it wasn’t just once; it was all over…If someone killed someone I loved, I would advocate for the death penalty.”
This was recorded in the last few months of Charlie’s life.
“You should not be able to have another passport and serve in the US government.”
💯
I would go a step further and say that no U.S. citizen should be able to have dual citizenship. Go be a citizen of another country full time if that’s what you’re after.
Charlie Kirk on NATO: “If Putin launches a missile to Poland right now and hits a restaurant, you might get drafted. How is that in our national interest exactly?”
💯
Candace desperate to stave off due process so she can keep the grift going.
Four years waiting for a murder trial—a trial that will likely end up taking months—to even commence is absurd.
Natalie Jean Beisner retweeted
Here’s Charlie just two years ago talking about how executions should be public, quick, and televised. He even suggests selling tickets and allowing kids of a certain age to watch.
Tucker and Candace both did segments excoriating President Trump for suggesting we’d livestream the military execution of the Fort Hood terrorist.
And yet, neither of them know or care what their “friend” Charlie believed.
And remember this clip when other bad actors share older clips of Charlie before he’d changed his mind on the death penalty.
You don’t have to agree with Charlie’s, but you don’t get to use him as a political pawn or remake his legacy and what he actually believed.
And if you think Charlie was a good and decent man, then maybe don’t mock the rest of us who agree with his take here.
Here’s Charlie just two years ago talking about how executions should be public, quick, and televised. He even suggests selling tickets and allowing kids of a certain age to watch.
Tucker and Candace both did segments excoriating President Trump for suggesting we’d livestream the military execution of the Fort Hood terrorist.
And yet, neither of them know or care what their “friend” Charlie believed.
And remember this clip when other bad actors share older clips of Charlie before he’d changed his mind on the death penalty.
You don’t have to agree with Charlie’s, but you don’t get to use him as a political pawn or remake his legacy and what he actually believed.
And if you think Charlie was a good and decent man, then maybe don’t mock the rest of us who agree with his take here.
Literally the only thing that matters is that Vivek would be a better governor for Ohioans.
Nothing else matters.