Since Chamath is going behind the scenes to explain what happened with the “below my line,”
I advised him to cut it from the pod, and I gave him multiple off-ramps during that discussion.
At that time, as Chamath shares, he was in “let it rip!” mode and went with it. That's his call obviously.
I like to ask hard questions and have candid moments on the show, but I always protect my besties if i think they're too honest, they mispeak or could say things more crisply!
Turns out, C feels that it was the most important moment in the history of the pod for him because it freed him, which is great!
Long live the pod!
Love you bestie! ❤️🫡😜
Going to be a wild pod this week… batten down the hatches! Show tapes Friday and release Saturday!
Chamath on his infamous “below my line” moment: “If you believe it, you should never apologize.”
"I've probably been canceled or attempted to be canceled at least once in a really big way because of the show."
"The whole story was Jason was talking about human rights or something like that. And I essentially said something to the effect of stop virtue signaling because you nor anybody else in America are willing to actually make the substantive changes if you actually thought this was an issue.”
“So you say it's an issue, but your behavior betrays it being an issue. And as far as I'm concerned, it's below my line."
"That's the thing that became a meme, or there's a picture of me talking about the Uyghurs in China specifically. But I said the uncomfortable truth. Cause it's true. And I think it's very dangerous to say things matter when they don't matter.“
"And then the White House put out some comment on the Monday on Martin Luther King day, which I thought, this is crazy. This is intense.“
"I remember a friend of mine texted me and he sent me this study, which was when you look back at all of these moments online when you're in the public firing line, he said, if you believe it, you should never apologize. Never ever apologize, ever."
"I kind of stood my ground. And this is before cancel culture was canceled. So it was in the throes of it. And so I felt it on my skin and I realized this is not a way a sustainable society operates."
"But in hindsight, that's the greatest gift that I've gotten from the pod is that one moment, because it was like all these important things all at once that showed me where we were and where we needed to be."
"It's an enormous gift to know that you cannot be canceled. It allows me to be a little bit closer every day to my truer and truer self, because whenever I get afraid, I can go back to that moment and remember how it felt like, but then remember what the outcome was."
Nathan Fox retweeted
"Let me explain this view I don't have so you can understand it better".
"Andrew how could you hold a view like this"
This is the easiest way to test for retardation.
Macron scored a big legal win against Candace
Lawsuit is moving forward
Will be interesting to see how it plays out
🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens is celebrating being PERSONALLY DISMISSED from the Macron defamation lawsuit. But there are a few things she conveniently left out...
First, yes, Owens secured a legal victory. The Delaware court dismissed her in her individual capacity because it lacked personal jurisdiction over her - NOT because she was cleared of wrongdoing or because the judge found her allegations to be true.
However, BOTH of her companies remain defendants in the lawsuit:
- Candace Owens LLC - the company she solely owns and manages, which publishes and distributes her content.
- Georgetom, Inc. - the company operating CandaceOwens.com, including her merchandise and paid subscriptions.
The judge REJECTED their attempt to have the lawsuit dismissed on inconvenient-forum grounds.
Secondly, it's bizarre that even when Owens scores a genuine legal victory, she still feels the need to LIE.
She claims:
"I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male."
Yet on PAGE 8 of the judge's 56-page decision, it explicitly states:
"Throughout the Series, Ms. Owens contended that Mrs. Macron is a biological man, that the Macrons are blood relatives, and that they abused levers of state power to keep the nature of their relationship a secret."
The judge also identifies her allegations about Brigitte Macron's identity as a central part of the dispute.
Owens however, wants her audience to believe this lawsuit was only about her claims involving MKUltra and an alleged identity theft. But the court's own description of the case proves this false.
The Macrons also secured TWO significant procedural victories:
-The court REFUSED to dismiss the lawsuit against Owens' two companies on inconvenient-forum grounds.
-The court REJECTED the attempt to strike the Macrons' amended complaint.
A potentially decisive statute-of-limitations question remains unresolved.
So yes, Candace Owens won an important personal legal victory. But she was NOT vindicated on the merits, BOTH of her companies remain defendants, and the lawsuit is FAR from over.
Nathan Fox retweeted
Replying to @ZacksJerryRig
Let's be real, I have a heck of a lot more experience making electronics in America than you do. You are wrong.
Nathan Fox retweeted
Never, ever let them tell you it can't be done.
Palmer Luckey says analysts claiming it's too expensive to manufacture in the US are lying to protect megacorps
"I think I have a more realistic view than almost anybody. One of the problems with all these analysts that are telling you that it's going to cost $37,000 to build an American iPhone or $100,000 to buy an American computer."
"They're trying to prop up a status quo that the megacorporations want to keep going. They want to outsource everything. They want to hire cheaper non-American labor."
"They are willing to say and do anything to convince you that it can't be fixed, that it can't come back, that America is this helpless, neutered, post-relevant empire, and it is just not the case."
"How do I know that? Because I have to make stuff in America every day because I work in the defense industry. The stuff that Anduril makes every day is not actually that different from a computer. My drones are basically computers. They have memory, a GPU, a CPU, sensors, batteries, a rugged integration."
"The only difference between an Anduril attack drone and a laptop is a keyboard and a screen. That is not that hard to figure out, especially for a guy like me who started Oculus and comes from the consumer electronics space."
"We're not going to let people lie about what America can and can't do anymore. We're just going to do it."
Nathan Fox retweeted
There's a strange thing that happens online and in real world conversations, where understanding or explaining an idea or phenomenon is interpreted as SUPPORTING it.
As a result, people pretend to not understand things, lest they be seen as advocating them.
Nathan Fox retweeted
Yes, in a sense this is correct. While she initially insisted on writing her monologues, which we had to edit into several different formats, eventually it was just easier to write them for her approval.
For the record, I never authored even one opinion piece for the Daily Wire.
You guys ghostwrote all of them and then slapped my name on it as the author for clicks.
Good luck finding the intern (or AI system?) you’re upset with.
@CommunityNotes
Nathan Fox retweeted
Midterms almost over and thank god.
Fighting with the conspiracy retards and blackpillers who perpetuate the leftist op to get Dems elected has been challenging.
Never talked to dumber people in my life.
Almost there. Then back to the left finally.
Nathan Fox retweeted
American glass. American metal. American silicon. American batteries. American workers. American everything.
BlueChip is the first American computer in decades. Don't let anyone lie to you and say it can't be done.
Designed in California. Built in America.
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Those who pick fights with me should understand that I will find out who is really pulling the strings and come for them, not just their puppets …
Capitol agenda: Dem gavels are coming for Elon Musk politi.co/4dPcGpd
Nathan Fox retweeted
Shawn had ZERO problem posting the episode featuring Candace Owens where she lied to his face for the entire show, he KNEW she was lying and posted it anyway because her name has draw and whoever Leah is doesn't have the same pull. He'll post lies for enough views.
Leah,
I chose not to release your episode because I personally had serious concerns about the truthfulness of your statements. I take what I put out on my platform seriously for myself and for my listeners. For the sake of transparency, here's the full interview so everyone can watch and draw their own conclusions.
As for my investments, I've intentionally made them public, as you see on my LinkedIn. I invest in Shield AI and Anduril for no other reason than I believe in their ability to develop technology that equips and protects the American warfighter. That's something deeply personal to me that I believe in.
@leahfiles
Of course they are heavily infiltrated. It couldn’t be more obvious. I’ve been saying it for months.
My dudes, this is soooo weird. @realjesseonfire @danksterintel
Does Danks not know how to make a video?
Nathan Fox retweeted
I'm sorry you are a retarded liar.
Watch the whole exchange, linked below. I was asked why I don't convert to Christianity. In the course of that explanation, I explained that from the Jewish perspective, Christians don't need to convert to Judaism to go to heaven. That's the context.
The conclusion to this answer: "I think you're doing a great job by believing in Jesus. I think that's great. I think you should continue to go to church, I think you should continue to speak out about your faith, I think that Chrsitanity in America needs a resurgence, and that's the greatest factor that will lead to a revitalized America."
youtu.be/sHAQqvCz9lY?t=2883
Nathan Fox retweeted
Replying to @paleochristcon
@paleochristcon has been trying to tell people for months now that most of the people claiming to just want justice for Charlie are actually people who hated him and want to destroy TPUSA and the Kirk family.
This quoted post is unavailable.
It's very important that we don't concede open source to socialists and communists. Capitalism is the greatest engine of growth and prosperity the world has ever seen. Open source is a great technique for aiding and accelerating it.
Nathan Fox retweeted
ABC won't talk to me in person even when I track down a news truck full of reporters!
Replying to @ABC
@ABC News continues to lie, this time privately to their friends in the press. This was a coordinated influence operation planted by our competition, not "premature publication".
7:01 AM October 7th, story goes live. Within minutes, dozens of high-profile commentators, politicians, and news outlets are sharing it with tens of millions of followers. We immediately contact ABC and demand they correct their false claims - after multiple rounds of refusal, they finally make a single one-word grammar edit. The editors stand by the reporting and insist the false claims are true.
Finally, eight hours after I was forced to call them out publicly, they delete everything. The editors hide all the comments, the author deletes his X account, and the story is completely wiped from their website without any explanation, directly violating SPJ ethics standards and ABC's own internal rules.
ABC is currently running a coverup operation, ignoring all of our requests for correction/retraction while telling their buddies to spread the word that this was nothing more than a CMS publication timeline error.



























