
Philosophy professor. 'Thinking Critically About Abortion'; 'Animals & Ethics 101'; Lead Editor @1000WordPhil ; some writings at @Salon ; https://nitter.gq/t.co/o1LpDJOKti
Atlanta / City of Decatur, GA
Joined March 2014
- Tweets32.9K
- Following1.5K
- Followers1.9K
- Likes47K
Pinned Tweet
I wrote a short book for college students: The College Success Rulebook: Practical Advice for College and Beyond.
It’s free and openly licensed for instructors to use and share:
CollegeSuccessRulebook.blogs…
#CollegeSuccess #StudentSuccess #HigherEd #CollegeStudents #OER
Nathan Nobis . com retweeted
Replying to @athiestboi
For what it's worth, it's something of a pro-choice myth that most anti-abortion advocates appeal to religious arguments. They don't, and pro-choice people understanding this might help.
AbortionArguments.com
Some questions:
if someone lies to you, are trying to mislead you? If you believed a lie from someone, were you misled?
(I'm trying to understand how people understand how lying and misleading relate. You can be mislead in ways other than being lied to, of course). #lying
100%Yes.
0%No.
8 votes • 18 hours Nathan Nobis . com retweeted
Replying to @Womp_Tomp
No, you should take a philosophy class and learn about these topics.
(However, what "moral experience" and "transcendent order" might be here is unclear; those aren't standard topics nearby).
Here Socrates is the key figure, from long ago:
1000wordphilosophy.com/2025/…
Nathan Nobis . com retweeted
✅ Your brain will thank you for:
• Practicing close reading
• Learning symbolic logic
• Engaging in metacognition
• Checking your sources
❌ Your brain will NOT thank you for:
Here's a joke that would be better made by someone else, but I will have to do:
"Liberals": "This candidate is flawed and so I won't vote for them."
"Conservatives": "This candidate is flawed and so I will vote for them."
Might not be a new joke either. New to me though.
Nathan Nobis . com retweeted
Replying to @ObhishekSaha
It is ridiculous that someone who should know better would make these mere assertions and provide no reason at all for what he bolldy asserts.
Also, nothing Sebo said depends on utilitarianism. That is poor reading comprehension.
I started making these #logic and #criticalthinking "cards." Maybe they can be useful here, given the many absurd things that people say.




