England, United Kingdom
Joined August 2017
- Tweets773
- Following219
- Followers35
- Likes5.1K
A European leader who has the cojones to stand up for the national interest!
Prime Minister of Slovakia, Robert Fico:
- What the German Chancellor Merz is asking of us requires a serious response. We must respond to him as a sovereign state, as a full member of the European Union. From here, from Bratislava. And on behalf of our government, I say to Mr. Merz: Slovakia will not participate in providing another loan to Ukraine for an amount of 70 billion euros. Period. We've done enough. And what happens next, I have no idea.
- I say this again, for everyone to hear. Slovakia will never approve a loan for Ukraine. This non-refundable gift of 70 billion. But if someone wants to, please, go ahead. I can't stop Germany if it has the means to do so. I can't stop France or others if they want to help Ukraine with money. Please, help. But Slovakia will not participate in this. Just as we are not participating in the provision of a 90 billion euro loan, which has already been approved by the European Union. I hope I have expressed myself clearly, unambiguously, and that no one will be misled regarding our position. SLOVAKIA IS NOT PARTICIPATING IN THIS.
2
NewEcologist retweeted
Gaza’s displaced families are being left to face freezing winter storms in tents that are now submerged in floodwater. This suffering cannot be allowed to continue, while the world turns a blind eye.
Alongside fellow MPs, I have written to the Foreign Secretary demanding urgent action and international pressure on Israel to end the obstruction of aid and reconstruction. Britain must stop issuing statements of concern and start using its influence to force change.
NewEcologist retweeted
Let’s do the actual math of the imperial supply chain.
Take a mother working in a garment factory in Bangladesh.
She works a 12-hour shift.
During that shift, she sews more than 150-200 t-shirts for H&M.
Her pay for the entire day? Less than 5 dollars.
Now look at the other end of the ledger.
H&M takes those exact same shirts and sells them to European consumers for more than 20 Euros each.
That is over 4,000 Euros in retail value. Generated by her hands. In a single day.
Her cut is less than a fraction of a percent. The rest goes straight to shareholders in Stockholm.
What is the human cost of this math?
This mother spends 12 hours away from her child. She works until her body gives out. And she goes home to a wage that barely covers the bare minimum food to share with her family at the dinner table.
This is what Western "free trade" actually looks like on the ground.
The European consumer gets cheap fashion. The corporate boardroom gets record dividends. The Bangladeshi mother gets starvation.
H&M runs massive ad campaigns in Europe talking about "conscious" fashion and "sustainability."
But there is absolutely nothing sustainable about a system that requires a mother to sacrifice her child's childhood just to keep the company's profit margins intact.
This is why the factories are shutting down.
They aren't just striking for a few extra cents. They are striking for the right to actually sit at the dinner table with their kids.
All power to the striking workers of Bangladesh.
They are hitting the empire right in the ledger.
NewEcologist retweeted
Ukrainian soldiers from the Azov Battalion execute a young woman with her hands tied behind her back, then bury her in a mass grave alongside other fallen soldiers.
This is what American taxpayers are funding.
This is what the European Union is financing and enabling.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This video is staged.
"Ukrainian soldiers" are wearing the wrong uniform
No traces of blood or any bullet after the shot
The same woman was seen in a different debunked video (voxukraine.org/fejk-vijskovi-…)
This video originated from a Russian propaganda Telegram channel
t.me/newsfrontnotes…
voxukraine.org/fejk-ukrayinsk…
NewEcologist retweeted
I simply cannot believe this was aired on corporate US media.
Israel’s absolute impunity is no longer a taboo.
Times are changing.
NewEcologist retweeted
The only ground allowed to be heard in Supreme Court appeal was balance between countering terrorism and freedom of speech and assembly.
The judges referenced terrorism, terrorist or national security 60 times.
They mentioned freedom of speech zero times.
craigmurray.org.uk/archives/…
NewEcologist retweeted
🇮🇱🇵🇸 It must be great being an Israeli settler when you can just walk into a Palestinian's home and declare it your own
But yeah, the reason people have turned against Israel is due to Russian bots, isn't it Bibi?
Writer: Ian
NewEcologist retweeted
Where in Europe, in 2026, can you watch men dressed in Nazi SS Uniforms, protected by the Police, marching through the streets?
Answer? Your darling Ukraine.
This is what British, EU and American taxpayers are paying for. This is what Russia is fighting.
The Burnham bounce hits soggy reality. It can’t last much longer.
In the past 100 days I’ve:
1. Armed Israel while it commits genocide in Gaza.
2. Provided Israel with daily surveillance reports to help it kill more people in Gaza.
3. Provided bases and military support for the US war on Iran.
4. Provided refuelling support for Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen.
5. Arrested hundreds of Palestine activists.
6. Kept the Palestine Action ban in place.
7. Barred leading scholars from entering Britain.
8. Banned books by bestselling authors.
9. Capitulated to the oil and gas lobby, approving new North Sea gas extraction.
10. Committed to a massive military spending spree, diverting billions from public investment.
11. Made it harder for migrants to secure permanent residency.
12. Continued the war on asylum seekers.
13. Tightened welfare assessments to cut benefit spending.
14. Threatened pension security.
15. Abandoned my proposal to cap political donations.
16. Redirected international climate finance to fund domestic transport subsidies.
5
NewEcologist retweeted
‼️
Ambassador Huckabee, this is unreleased video of an American who was beaten almost to death last week by Israeli settlers. You know his name because he came to you for help, but you blew him off. That’s disgraceful. Do your job.
@GovMikeHuckabee
@SecRubio
@davidamilstein
@WhiteHouse
NewEcologist retweeted
That particular moment when George Yeo, Singapore’s former foreign minister, demonstrated a remarkably deep understanding of European history and the complex conflicts that have shaped the continent,an understanding that seems to elude many Western politicians.
It is genuinely rare to hear a senior statesman speak with such historical depth, intellectual clarity, and geopolitical insight.....
NewEcologist retweeted
David Hearst, editor-in-chief of Middle East Eye, says that watching NAZA, a documentary featuring interviews with members of an elite Israeli army unit involved in supplying targets for what he describes as genocide, should be “compulsory” for Britain’s liberal Zionists
NewEcologist retweeted
Oborne nails it: If Eizenkot replaces Netanyahu, don't be fooled.
Eizenkot authored the "Da'iya doctrine"-causing maximum havoc and destruction of civilians. Yet, if he wins, liberal Zionists will say, "Oh, this is a sensible person."
Israel can be brought back into the international fold while the ethnic cleansing continues. The world needs to see the full horror, not just the new packaging
No. No state has any ‘right to exist’. Only people and Peoples have that right. Including both Jews and Palestinians.
The idiot’s guide to states – and their ‘rights’:
1. States exist. Some 200 of them.
2. States are the political arrangement in which a people express their self-determination. That arrangement can and does change.
3. States enjoy rights, but only against each other. They have the right, for example, not to face unprovoked aggression from another state.
4. No state has some enduring, abstract “right” to exist. Otherwise bad ones like apartheid South Africa would be unreformable.
5. Peoples, by contrast, do have a right to exist. That’s why states that commit apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide are so gravely violating international law. Because they are violating a people’s right to exist.
6. When people argue Israel has a “right” to exist, they are trying to dupe you into believing international law is fine with apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide. It isn’t. For obvious reasons, international law prefers the rights of peoples over those of states. Otherwise, no state could ever be illegitimate. Its rights would trump those of the people it rules over.
7. When someone refuses to agree that Israel has a “right” to exist, they are not being antisemitic, whatever the media keeps telling you. They are upholding international law: the precedence of peoples’ rights over those of states.
8. The claim that Israel has a “right” to exist is not what it seems. It’s really the claim that the current reality of extreme inequality between Israelis and Palestinians be set in stone. It’s the diabolical claim that Israel has a right to commit apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide against the Palestinian people.
1
18
NewEcologist retweeted
Went on BBC Politics Live to discuss why Zionism is a racist ideology. The anchor and all three panelists looked like they were about to cry at the end. Very weird behaviour.
Join the Green Party.
