Objective Christian

There has never been a prophet named Muhammad

Jesus is a prophet, right? Even Christians believe that. Jesus is also a king, AND he's a high priest. Jesus is ALL THREE at the same time. He's not part king or part priest. He doesn't temporarily stop being high priest in order to be prophet. Jesus is FULLY king. Jesus is FULLY high priest. Jesus is FULLY prophet. He's all three in one. Jesus is FULLY God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. TRUE God from TRUE God. ✝️😎

Very sad news to hear about @SirPatStew #PatrickStewart's passing. I've been a big fan of his for the majority of my life. There are very few celebrities I ever wanted to meet. He will be missed greatly. #OhCaptainMyCaptain

That's against what your Quran states. There is not one single ayat that says the Kitab of the Christians & Jews is corrupted. Not even one. 2:79? It's about a new book that was written, and not the text the Jews had in the 7th century (see 2:41 & 2:85). No textual corruption. Sometimes you guys try 2:75, but it too has no mention of text. 3:78 & 4:46 are a common one you guys misinterpret. Both state the people of the book twist the words 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙩𝙤𝙣𝙜𝙪𝙚𝙨. That's about teaching and interpretation. No textual corruption. Last one you guys have is 5:13. If you read the context from 5:1-12 you will find that it's talking about contracts. Your early scholars like Ibn Kathir state it refers to the Covenant of Sinai for the Jews, and the covenant Christians in Arabia made with Muhammad. Not a single reference to the kitab of the Christians & Jews. No textual corruption. And that's it. That's ALL you have. The Quran instead claims to fully confirm the kitab of the Christians & Jews. Ayah 2:85 states the Jews must obey the 𝙛𝙪𝙡𝙡 𝙏𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙝 and not just parts, impossible if there is corruption. This is full confirmation. In 5:43-48 the Quran establishes that the kitab of the Christians and Jews is every bit as authoritative as Muhammad's divine judgements, even claiming to be the guardian protector of it. That is 100% 𝙛𝙪𝙡𝙡 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 of what Christians & Jews held "between their hands" in the 7th century AD. Guess what? That's the same one we have today. If the Bible is TRUE the Quran is FALSE for contradicting it. If the Bible is FALSE the Quran is FALSE for claiming to fully confirm it. Either way the Quran is FALSE. ✝️😎

Let's talk Christian monotheism. The Trinity. There is no comparison that is truly able to fully articulate the nature of the one God. However, I like to use Jesus as an example. * Jesus the Messiah is a prophet. This is a true statement that in no way challenges Christianity. * Jesus is a king. He's the King of kings and Lord of lords. * Jesus is a high priest in the order of Melchizedek. Which one is he? King, priest, or prophet? Jesus is all three, and Jesus is one. He's not partly a king, or partly a prophet. He's not a prophet one day and high priest the next. Jesus is fully king. Jesus is fully high priest. Jesus is fully prophet. All three are one in Christ Jesus, a tri-union. The Trinity is the same. God is one, and in whom are three persons. This isn't 3 gods. Just like how king, priest, & prophet share the same "Jesus-nature". Father, Son, & Spirit are one. ✅️ Christianity is monotheistic

I've used this argument too. Slimmies have NO RESPONSE. Their puny god is trapped in the night side of the planet. Their tiny rat god is subject to his own alleged creation. The Allah of the Quran must submit to creation. He's not the YHWH of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. There is no valid reason to trust the Quran

Awesomeness mode: LEGENDARY. Bravo #Korea 👏 Muslims just don't get it. They're so quick to cry about pork being haram that they blindly miss that camel is also unclean according to the covenant law they claim to follow. It's literally THREE VERSES earlier in the same chapter of Leviticus. In the Quran it says to eat camel meat. How do Muslims reconcile this? They say Allah "abrogated" it. It just so happens Allah Yasu al-Masih (Jesus Christ) abrogated the dietary laws in Mark 7:19. Surah 22:36, line all the Quran, is entirely unnecessary. The truth about Jesus Christ is found in the kitab is the Christians & Jews, the Bible. There is no valid reason to trust the Quran.

There has never been a prophet named Muhammad.

"Progressive Christianity" isn't Christianity. Over on 🧵 this one tried to challenge me. My response to her 👇 It's not the answer I "𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁". It's the εὐαγγέλιον Jesus taught. Tell me, in mathematics which number comes before the other: 3 or 15? I only ask because you mentioned John 15, and last I checked John 3 comes before that, which marks the 𝙗𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 of Jesus' ministry. What does Jesus say at the 𝙗𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜? You must be 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯. Maybe that's just Gospel of John though. 🤔🤔 In Matthew 4:17 the earliest ministry statement he made was "𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘁 for the kingdom of heaven is at hand". Mark 1:15 says the same thing, "repent". Luke 5:32 says that he had come to call sinners to repentance. So.....yeah I guess.🤷🏼‍♂️ The Gospel message is belief in Jesus, repentance, transformation, forgiveness, and eternal life in Jesus. THAT is the answer to the question. It's not my interpretation. It's what Jesus taught. It is the εὐαγγέλιον. It is the Gospel.

Islam is struggling.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Oh man #OrthoDucklips (@muslimorthodoxy) Thank you for the sitcom of your debate with #VocabMalone. You got thoroughly EMBARRASED. You got thoroughly CURB-STOMPED. You got thoroughly EVISCERATED. You barked like a filthy dog while Malone tap danced on your false prophet's grave. Thank you for showing everyone Islam is a false religion. There is no valid reason to trust the Quran 🤣😆👉☪️

There is no valid reason to trust the Quran

With respect to Dr Ehrman this is false. 1 Corinthians 11:23–25 Paul mentions the event of Jesus' betrayal. While it does not explicitly call Judas out by name it's reasonable to conclude he did in fact know about the circumstances surrounding the event. I don't need to know the names of the 9/11 hijackers to know it really happened, and even if I did, my not mentioning them does not add to or take away from it's validity

That's just the thing though, Jesus doesn't deny it. You can't cherry-pick a verse out of context like that the thesis statement drives interpretation. This is how exegesis works. In Mark several times Jesus refers to himself as the Son of Man. That's all fine & good until you get to Mark 14:62. The chief priest asks is he is the Son of YHWH the blessed one. Jesus replies “I am, and you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙣.” Who alone comes riding on the clouds of Heaven? Deuteronomy 33:26 "There is none like the God of Jeshurun, 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙧𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙖𝙞𝙙, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙𝙨 in His majesty." Who alone comes riding on the clouds of Heaven? Isaiah 19:1 This is the burden against Egypt: 𝘽𝙚𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙙, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙇𝙊𝙍𝘿 𝙧𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙣 𝙖 𝙨𝙬𝙞𝙛𝙩 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙; He is coming to Egypt. The idols of Egypt will tremble before Him, and the hearts of the Egyptians will melt within them. Who alone comes riding on the clouds of Heaven? Psalm 104:2-3 He wraps Himself in light as with a garment; He stretches out the heavens like a tent, laying the beams of His chambers in the waters above, 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙𝙨 𝙃𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙤𝙩, 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙙 Who alone comes riding on the clouds of Heaven? Daniel 7:13 and I saw One like the Son of Man 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙣. Who alone comes riding on the clouds of Heaven? Revelation 14:14 And I looked and saw a white cloud, and 𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙 was One like the Son of Man, with a golden crown on His head and a sharp sickle in His hand Even Surah 2:210 shares this imagery. When Jesus made his claim that he'll be the one riding on the clouds, everyone present understood what that meant. Jesus claimed to be GOD. You can't cherry-pick a verse out of context like that the thesis statement drives interpretation. This is how exegesis works.

This is the future of Islam: