AI for chemistry and material science @AIatMeta. Previously known as Open Catalyst Project.

Joined June 2021
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
FAIR Chemistry retweeted
The Open Molecules 2025 dataset is out! With >100M gold-standard ωB97M-V/def2-TZVPD calcs of biomolecules, electrolytes, metal complexes, and small molecules, OMol is by far the largest, most diverse, and highest quality molecular DFT dataset for training MLIPs ever made 1/N
4
102
8
423
44,521
Introducing the newest members to the family - OMol25 and UMA. Check them out below!
Excited to share our latest releases to the FAIR Chemistry’s family of open datasets and models: OMol25 and UMA! @AIatMeta @OpenCatalyst OMol25: huggingface.co/facebook/OMol… UMA: huggingface.co/facebook/UMA Blog: ai.meta.com/blog/meta-fair-s… Demo: huggingface.co/spaces/facebo…
1
12
58
4,541
FAIR Chemistry retweeted
For existing MLIPs, lower test errors do not always translate to better performance in downstream tasks. We bridge this gap by proposing eSEN -- SOTA performance on compliant Matbench-Discovery (F1 0.831, κSRME 0.321) and phonon prediction. arxiv.org/abs/2502.12147 1/6
7
24
3
100
13,135
FAIR Chemistry retweeted
Our team at FAIR is looking for research interns in 2025. We work on a range of AI for chemistry topics from applied projects to machine learning potentials and generative models. If you are interested please apply and don’t hesitate to reach out! metacareers.com/jobs/1243659…
1
28
1
158
24,046
and of course huge thanks to @jrib_ for their help and effort with the matbench-discovery.materials…
10
1,950
Work by @lbluque, @mshuaibii, @xiangfu_ml, @bwood_m, @csmisko, Meng Gao, @ammarhrizvi, C. Lawrence Zitnick, @zackulissi Get in touch to share your experience and feedback!
1
13
2,196
This work builds upon open research, notably Alexandria and the Materials Project, and wouldn’t have been possible without those efforts! Alexandria: alexandria.icams.rub.de/ Materials Project: next-gen.materialsproject.or… 6/x
1
1
18
2,026
When training EquiformerV2 (31M) on only MPtrj we found that adding an auxiliary denoising objective (see DeNS arxiv.org/abs/2403.09549) substantially improved performance due to effective data augmentation and by preventing overfitting on a smaller dataset. 5/x
2
13
1,967
Our EquiformerV2 (86M) model pre-trained on OMat and fine-tuned on MPtraj and a subset of Alexandria, is state-of-the-art on Matbench discovery across all metrics with an F1 score > 0.9 and an accuracy of 20 meV/atom. 4/x
1
2
3
26
18,934
Data diversity was achieved by sampling relaxed structures from Alexandria followed by one of three different processes: - Rattled Boltzmann Sampling - Ab-Initio Molecular Dynamics - Rattled Relaxation 3/x
1
16
2,204
OMat24 contains over 100 million Density Functional Theory calculations focused on structural and compositional diversity. The force and stress distributions are substantially more broad than other open datasets for training ML potentials. 2/x
1
3
20
3,563
Introducing Meta’s Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Dataset and Models! All under permissive open licenses for commercial and non-commercial use! Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2410.12771 Dataset: huggingface.co/datasets/fair… Models: huggingface.co/fairchem/OMAT… 🧵1/x
16
169
30
602
200,701
Come work with us on the FAIR Chemistry team! Roles: - Postdoc: metacareers.com/jobs/1194146… - Research interns: metacareers.com/jobs/1243659… Reach out if you have any questions and help spread the word!
8
1
34
5,646
Work by @KareemAbdelmaq3 @mshuaibii @AdeeshKolluru Raffaele Cheula and @johnkitchin
2
664
Before using an adsorption energy model, one should be aware of surface reconstructions that can impact results. Alternatively, total energy models are more robust models to surface reconstructions that still work on par with existing adsorption energy models
1
1
662
Perhaps the most notable impact on errors are surface reconstructions. This can pose an ill-defined adsorption energy, making it difficult for models to train and evaluate.
1
154
Interestingly, they also show that the performance of models trained on data with the tighter DFT settings is comparable to those trained with the original OC20 settings.
1
1
1
1,628
While tighter convergence settings have a considerable impact on DFT total energy; when they look at energy differences like the adsorption energy, they see significantly smaller convergence errors due to a cancellation of errors. Results shown for the OC20-200k dataset.
1
1
174
A DFT convergence study shows that there is room to improve the calculations for OC20 by tightening settings like the plane-wave cutoff, k-point sampling, and smearing width.
1
234