Orem

Craziest misunderstanding! I do hope this gets the attention of Ubisoft so they can get some insight out of it and hopefully fix the issue. Skittlz made a video about me not communicating in a Legends Division match that we had together. It was presented like I did this intentionally but I had a voice chat bug. I literally could not make nor hear any comms the entire game. Voice chat bugs are nothing new in Siege but this one in particular should be especially interesting for Ubi and anyone reading this. I went back to my stream VOD to get a clip and to my surprise the in-game comms are fully audible for the entire match. Again, I was not able to hear any of the comms in the match. How is it possible for comms to be audible on my stream but not in game? Below is a clip of me playing Deimos on stream followed by the same moment recorded on my gaming PC, this 2nd clip is what I experience in my match. I have a standard 2 PC, GOXLR streaming setup. There is no setting in Siege for users to separate in-game comms and SFX, yet it is somehow separated, making one audible and the other not. However, when I feed the the "line in" audio to my streaming PC, the comms are somehow there. I typically hear in game comms, the lack of it only happens occasionally, and audio settings on my end always stay the same. I don't know how the game is coded but there is definitely some separation in the audio's coding. Throughout the whole match I'm casually speaking over them because I'm unable to hear them. I mentioned in the text chat that I have a mic bug and I even explain to my stream that I can't hear them despite the mic icons lighting up in the scoreboard. There's even a moment where I check my audio settings because I was confused by the mics lighting up but no sound. This is an obvious misunderstanding @Skitttlz so I have no ill-will but I do hope you make things right now that the record is set straight.

One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.

It’s crazy to me that Christian people think gay people go to hell just because they’re gay. God knew they was gone be gay before they were even born and He Still love them. It’s about the type of person that you are that’s gone get you into heaven.

yo @fettR6S this is worst than wintrading? ugly ass racist 🤣

Ban everyone from the LAN

I'm sick of @GeekDaFreakkkkk 's attitude. Consider this when trying him out.

Netanyahu: “Before I even start, any MORAL disgusting COWARDS still sitting in this hall can get up and leave now.”