Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov) header
Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov) profile picture

From hotels & wine to code | Building https://nitter.gq/t.co/j30k590yVx | https://nitter.gq/t.co/nuPGLp6XJz

Joined January 2015
Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)Photo by Petar Zayakov (@PZayakov)
Not ready to accept the statement that chat is the only UI we would need. You telling me that from all fancy UIs we saw in movies like Star Wars, Star Trek, Marvels only JKR was right? Do not forget how it almost ended up for Ginny
1
53
This👌
I have switched back to my mac studio as a streaming/recording machine after tying out omarchy for a while. some notes: omarchy handled the basics just fine, and I was surprised with how easily I got things set up. But stream deck, prompter, and a couple scene level things didn't work well. I could have clanked together some software to handle this stuff for me. But I would rather have something I trust will work, and has actual vendor support (elgato on linux is a joke). just my 2 cents. love linux and omarchy. But OSS stuff isn't quite ready for certain things. Mainly when vendors don't support it.
70
Dear agents, please stop generating elements which look like interactive but in fact they are not. People get confused and click around for nothing
55
Delší dobu pracuji na ordinio.cz. Mám za cíl zjednodušit lékařským ordinacím práci při správě svých webů a zároveň dopřát pacientům dobrou uživatelskou zkušenost. Moc rád bych se propojil s lékaři pro případnou case-study.
2
82
Update: get ready, Jev weekend ahead
here we go, get ready for weekend on X full with 3D renders.
1
83
here we go, get ready for weekend on X full with 3D renders.
1
3
292
Almost impossible to keep any unique idea for business these days. It was similar in the past, but the copy-cats are super fast now. Few months ago launched web-app on small market. Found 3 new, literally same projects today. Same wording, features and so on
1
413
I am really interested to hear how software houses and agencies are doing in the age of AI in terms of business and closing deals. Is there a strong push towards lower fees due to “code is cheap”? Do you face some huge change compared to good old times?
52
just thinking while reading watermark paper from Claude. What if creators start to add watermark on their work? Why should anything you created get lost in the probability universe and stamped with watemark of LLM which might have used it as part of generated output?
59
I am wondering how tech-blogs and similar media are doing in the AI age. Are people still interesting in reading articles, blog posts and so on?
1
199
I always thought the in general LLMs are strongest in writing and working with texts. Not sure if it is a skill issue, but recent outputs for whatever I try are bad. Almost unusable. Saying as person native in multiple languages.
61
Coding with AI sometimes feels like driving with navigation. You set the route and you just need to believe that it will navigate you through all the traffic well. Sometimes you feel you can do better. If so, just turn the navigation off.
1
69
Petar Zayakov retweeted
Sharing some more UI previews for Superlogical, this time the "tab peek." If you three-finger swipe down, you can "peek" at the other session tabs. These are live-updating, metal-rendered previews including splits. If you keep dragging, you enter a "mission control" style mode. This is one of those UI patterns that once you get used to, you mindlessly find yourself doing it ALL THE TIME. It's a great way to quickly take a look at everything thats going on. You aren't reading the mini text of course, but the shape of it tells you a lot about where things are. The peek pushes the terminal down off screen, it doesn't resize it, so it doesn't force any weird reflow or anything either. There's a lot more to talk about, especially about how this interacts with how we expose what needs attention so you can easily find the terminals/sessions/etc. that require your attention. Of course, you'll be able to drive this with the keyboard too. :) As always, a disclaimer: this is all early work subject to change, just trying to share some of what we're building in public. A lot of the UI experiential design is @almonk so follow him for more updates too!
141
73
30
2,194
353,122
Having more than 10yrs experience in FMCG this situation reminds me of relation between suppliers x big food chains. It worked well for some. But generally sup pushed for lower price started to deliver lower quality in big quantity - bad for end customer.
Ironically, given the ease with which we can build anything*, instantly* these days - I think people are really turned off by the influx of poorly considered apps and software that is flooding our industry. The people yearn for quality.
1
121
Good thing is that over time, some people started to realize that quality > quantity.
1
162
Petar Zayakov retweeted
Alright. I want you to read this. Earlier today, I released a new component. What you see is the finished result. What you don’t see are the days of planning, research, testing, designing, simplifying, throwing ideas away, and trying again before I felt it was ready. Within hours, it had been copied and ported to another framework by pointing an agent at my code. Of course, it’s open source. They were allowed to do it. And I’ve been around long enough, with multiple successful products, that I don’t care. But what if this was someone’s first product? What if they spent months building it, launched on Friday, and by Monday it had been cloned by agents, repackaged, and made free? What happens when your second product is copied? Your fifth? Your tenth? What happens when every new idea immediately becomes the next prompt? What happens when your roadmap, your changelog, and your launch announcements become someone else input prompts? What happens when models become good enough to copy bigger ideas? What happens when “just execute better” stops being the answer? What happens when “just build bigger” or “think wider” stops being enough? What happens when both ideas and execution become cheap? What happens when the creator pays the full cost of creativity but everyone else pays nothing to reproduce it? What happens to creativity when AI makes copying effectively free? What happens to the will to create when AI makes copying effectively free? Look, copying is not new. Copying at this speed, cost, and scale is. People will tell you to think bigger. But nobody starts "bigger". Every one of us here started by making something small. You keep going because, somewhere along the way, the work is rewarded. Maybe people use it. Maybe they pay for it. Maybe they simply recognize the thought, effort, and care that went into it. Copying once demanded effort. You had to study the work and understand it to copy it. That effort created appreciation for the person who made it. Not anymore. Creativity begins with small steps. If we make those first steps feel pointless, we don’t just lose small products. We lose the people who might have gone on to build the big ones. We are uniquely positioned here. We get to use and experience this life-changing technology before almost everyone else. How we use it will set the default everywhere else. That default will spread to writing, design, music, research, and every other field where someone still has to take the first creative risk. We can use AI to build great things. Or we can use it to strip every new idea for parts. We decide.
262
453
128
4,688
400,688
Curious to see nicely working multi-team integration for design system to code. (Figma ->) Claude Design -> Claude Code.
1
75
Petar Zayakov retweeted
from my experience, even the best models (Opus 4.6, 5.4 xhigh / 5.3 codex) cannot write good code today without an amount of work that is equivalent to just doing the work myself am excited for a world where they can, but in the current state i have very low trust in them
269
85
54
2,766
323,339