Absurdo dos absurdos!
Os Democratas venceram porque Trump cagou, sentou em cima e continuou a cagar.Phudheu a economia, deu privilégios aos ricos ao invés dos pobres.
Janones foi distração criada pelo PT e TSE para mascarar as estranhezas da apuração! Só otário para cair nessa!
P W Deutschland retweeted
China’s response to the U.S. midterms is almost deliberately cold:
It is America’s domestic affair.
No cheering. No panic.
No fantasy that a change of party will suddenly change Washington’s China policy.
China has watched enough U.S. elections to understand the pattern:
Republicans may be more blunt.
Democrats may be more polished.
The anti-China consensus remains.
So Beijing does not bet on American parties.
Whoever comes, China deals with them.
兵来将挡,水来土掩。
They aren’t commies! They're a gang of corrupt individuals who only care about getting rich. In communist China, the corrupt are executed by firing squad. In Brazil, the corrupt are rewarded with positions such as Courts justices, members of parliament, and even the presidency!
P W Deutschland retweeted
Replying to @PeeWeeDelFl
When he was just a lawyer, he stole money from a case he work on (stole money from a client) and went to Paris.,
Ela é pau mandado de Lula, STF e Alcolumbre.
Não existe divisão. A direita vai ter um candidato à presidência do Senado. Rogério Marinho e eu somos aliados, do mesmo campo, e vamos decidir com estratégia quem tem mais condições de chegar lá.
Minha candidatura está posta e é para valer. Meu projeto sempre foi o Senado: ser a primeira mulher a ocupar essa cadeira em 203 anos.
P W Deutschland retweeted
Não existe divisão. A direita vai ter um candidato à presidência do Senado. Rogério Marinho e eu somos aliados, do mesmo campo, e vamos decidir com estratégia quem tem mais condições de chegar lá.
Minha candidatura está posta e é para valer. Meu projeto sempre foi o Senado: ser a primeira mulher a ocupar essa cadeira em 203 anos.
Gilmar Mendes says printed ballots violate secrecy and invite fraud. It's the exact opposite: paper is what lets us audit the count. Another serious overreach by the Supreme Court, usurping the role of Congress and the voters.
É falso que urnas “roubam votos” quanto mais tempo permanecem abertas. Publicação usa horários de encerramento das seções para sugerir fraude; gráfico não demonstra alteração de votos: bit.ly/4yY25Qs

ALT Captura de tela de uma publicação em rede social (aparentemente X/Twitter). O post afirma, com um ícone de alerta vermelho: “Veja o gráfico. A diferença entre Lula e Flávio aumenta progressivamente. Esse é o padrão que se obtém com urnas que roubam votos sutilmente com o passar do tempo. Mais tempo sem encerrar as urnas, mais votos roubados.”Abaixo, há um gráfico de linhas e uma tabela com dados numéricos. Sobre a imagem está carimbada em vermelho, de forma destacada, a palavra “BOATO”.Na parte inferior aparecem as métricas de engajamento: 43 comentários, 416 compartilhamentos, 1,5 mil curtidas e cerca de 59,6 mil visualizações. O fundo da captura é escuro, típico de modo noturno.
¡EU y China!
Los regímenes occidentales están en bancarrota: se han convertido en «corruptocracias».Por el contrario, el sistema de China es saludable y sirve a la mayoría, mientras que las corruptocracias solo benefician al pequeño grupo que las controla (el «Estado profundo»).
Les États-Unis et la Chine !
Les régimes occidentaux sont en faillite : ils sont devenus des « corruptocraties ». À l’inverse, le système chinois est sain et sert la majorité, tandis que les corruptocraties ne profitent qu’au petit groupe qui les contrôle (l’« État profond »).
Die USA und China!
Westliche Regime sind bankrott: Sie haben sich in Korruptokratien verwandelt. Chinas System hingegen ist gesund und dient der Mehrheit, während Korruptokratien lediglich jener kleinen Gruppe zugutekommen, die sie kontrolliert (der „Deep State“).
The US and China!
Western regimes are bankrupt: they have become corruptocracies. By contrast, China’s system is healthy and serves the majority, whereas corruptocracies benefit only the small group that controls them (Deep State).
P W Deutschland retweeted
“China doesn't have elections! Every Election Day proves America is better than China!”
Does holding elections automatically make the United States a better country than China? I don't believe so. And today's midterm elections are a perfect example of why👇
Today, millions of Americans will head to the polls to vote. If Democrats win both the House and Senate, they'll control Congress and have the power to block much of Trump's legislative agenda for the next two years.
But think about the incredible irony here.
For millions of Americans, the BEST possible outcome of this election is simply preventing the other side from accomplishing anything.
That's it.
Not building better infrastructure. Not improving healthcare. Not investing in education. Not fixing America's crumbling public transportation systems.
Just stopping the other party.
We've reached a point where political gridlock is celebrated as a victory.
And somehow, we're supposed to believe this automatically makes our political system superior to China's?
Let's look at the other side.
China doesn't have competitive national elections where citizens can vote the Communist Party out of power. That's a fact. China is governed by the CPC, although eight other legally recognized political parties also exist.
But here's the fundamental difference I see between these two systems:
In America, you CAN change the party, but you often CAN'T change the policy.
In China, you CAN'T change the ruling party, but you CAN change the policy.
For decades, Americans have elected Republicans and Democrats who promise change. Yet Washington continues pouring enormous resources into overseas military operations while Americans struggle with healthcare costs, aging infrastructure, and an increasingly unaffordable cost of living.
Meanwhile, China has spent decades investing heavily in high-speed rail, highways, airports, hospitals, schools, and modern metro systems.
The infrastructure that millions of ordinary people actually use every single day.
China has built the world's largest high-speed rail network. Entire cities have been transformed. Hundreds of millions of people have escaped extreme poverty over the past several decades.
These are tangible improvements in people's lives.
I think we should judge a government by what it actually DELIVERS to its citizens?
Now, I'm grateful to have the right to vote as an American. I value that right enormously.
But I'm also deeply frustrated that the best outcome many Americans can realistically hope for today is two more years of political paralysis.
Two more years of Republicans and Democrats fighting each other while the country's biggest problems remain unresolved.
Meanwhile, China will continue pursuing its long-term development priorities, investing in infrastructure, technology, manufacturing, and economic growth.
Democracy should be judged by more than the ability to cast a ballot. Government should also be judged by its ability to improve people's lives.
I'll let you decide which system is delivering better results.
Brazil, elections controversy!
Transparency Intl and the OECD remain silent regarding the fact that Brazilian elections lack a paper trail for votes—even in the face of widespread voter distrust! Why could that be?
Hello
@mairamartini
@anticorruption
@MathiasCormann
@OECD
Brazil, elections controversy!
Transparency Intl and the OECD remain silent regarding the fact that Brazilian elections lack a paper trail for votes—even in the face of widespread voter distrust! Why could that be?
Hello
@mairamartini,
@anticorruption,
@MathiasCormann,
@OECD!
























