Pete 'Питик' Liquid

Just a reminder on this Remembrance Day that we pay tribute to the millions of our ancestors who fought against the Nazis by using billions of our tax dollars to fund Nazis in Ukraine.

Russian lead negotiator Medinsky slaps down the irellevant EU "I dont know why they are here" The EU seems to have no floor when it comes to embarrassing itself.

⚠️ Just now! Dangerous leaked information from official sources in Lebanon; Talks are going on between some Lebanese and French officials including Zionist lobbyists in Paris and Washington To get France to put The Trilateral Framework Agreement between the United States, Israel, and Lebanon was signed in Washington, D.C., on June 26, 2026 to a vote under the United Nations Security Council This will cancel previous UN resolutions such as 1701 and 1559 In simple English what is taking place behind closed doors is to get the United Nations to do Israel's job in Lebanon. The Framework Agreement gives Israel everything it wants and also this agreement doesn't take Lebanese sovereignty under any consideration whatsoever. This is pretty serious especially if France goes for voting this under chapter 7 of the UN Security Council. This means that the UN can assign military forces to implement it. Will keep u updated. Source: U.S. Department of State (.gov) share.google/4ZwhemsByNAvfVv…

🇷🇺🇺🇦 "Every inch of our land will be returned to Russia. One way or another. And let European newspapers continue to live in the world of their illusions." – Vladimir Medinsky, head of Russia's delegation in Abu Dhabi Russia will cede nothing, it's that simple.

Ceding Ukrainian land for peace is just abstract words. It’s not only about reality, even more about philosophy. Putin was talking about Donbas, but then he decided to occupy Kyiv, our capital. His words were about Donbas, but the reality was about Kyiv. He kept saying he was defending Russian-speaking people and then tortured hundreds and thousands to death in Bucha and other places. So that wasn’t about Russian-speaking people. This is why when Americans asked, “Can you exchange Donbas for security?” I said right there, “Can you tell me what it means? What security? NATO?” “Not NATO, but similar to NATO.” “Similar? But you don't want the answer about Donbas to be ‘similar.’ You want a clear answer about Donbas. This is your goal. And this is Putin’s goal, for today. What will you do if we have security guarantees but not NATO?” They took our nuclear weapons. I'm not a fan of nuclear weapons. I think the world would be a better place without them. But the Russians took our nuclear weapons, didn’t they? They did. Then they stopped our integration into Europe, then prevented us from being in NATO. And in the end they occupied us. This is why it’s an abstract question. Nobody trusts Putin to stop if we leave Donbas. He will pause. Then he will come back in one year, two years, or five years. And who will be guilty? From an interview with DR Nyheder. (2/3)

World group chat 😂😂😂😂

Skepticism about providing help to Ukraine is not good for any European country, because it’s all about Russia. Russia is against European rules and values. Pragmatically, it’s important and even necessary to have a strong Ukraine. If European help disappears, the consequences could only be either dangerous or very dangerous. Dangerous: Russia continues its hybrid attacks, like it did many times in Moldova, Romania, Bulgaria, even in Germany and in Nordic countries, like Finland and Denmark. They will start doing it on a massive scale. It's a soft scenario. Very dangerous: Russia moves deeper into Europe. Putin wants the USSR back and back in the USSR. Now what does that mean? To have influence over the former USSR countries: the Baltic states and Moldova at the very least. So it’s also about countries that are in NATO, which means NATO will have to react. All of Europe will get involved, and the United States. There are also perils at sea. Russia could block the Baltic Sea like it blocks the Black Sea. From an interview with DR Nyheder. (1/3)

Read this by the great @HamishDBG telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…

Zelenskyy has rejected the possibility of territorial concessions in exchange for security guarantees for Ukraine that do not include full NATO membership. "When the Americans asked, 'Could you trade the Donbas for security?' I immediately replied, 'Can you tell me what that means? What kind of security? NATO?' 'Not NATO, but something like NATO.' 'Something like it? But surely you wouldn't want the answer regarding the Donbas to be "something like it." You want a clear answer about the Donbas. What will happen if we have a security guarantee that isn't NATO?'" Zelenskyy stated in an interview with DR Nyheder. Zelenskyy also asserted that no one believes the Russian Armed Forces would end the war if Ukraine were to surrender the Donbas; instead, Russia would likely just take a pause before returning to the conflict. This statement was made against the backdrop of ongoing trilateral negotiations in Abu Dhabi and rumors of a potential backroom compromise regarding territory—a notion that Zelenskyy’s remarks effectively refute.