Pete Soudar retweeted
Confiscation of private property - AI or otherwise - is Communism.
Ass-hat @AbdulElSayed is not a "capitalist" - he shows his true Marxist colors here...
Plus -his mathing ain't mathing...
The numbers never add up to paying for his $40 Trillion a year Medicaid for All socialist wet dream...
Fast-talking El-Sayed’s socialism coming out in full force as he proposes that the government confiscate 50% of all AI companies…both shares and management.
He also claims that an 8% wealth tax on billionaires would return $4.6 trillion to taxpayers over 10 years, even though the combined net worth of all U.S. billionaires is estimated at roughly $8 to $9 trillion, and the confiscation tax would pay for just a fraction of his $40 trillion socialized medicine plan…not to mention that wealth taxes have been abandoned by countries that try them because they cause capital flight and end up costing more money than they actually bring in.
Pete Soudar retweeted
NOW THEY’RE SUDDENLY NOTICING? THE INSURRECTION ACT, MARTIAL LAW & THE MIDTERMS — WHY NOW?
Let me be clear: I personally do NOT see this happening before the elections….but…
Something interesting is happening in the national media narrative.
With the November 3 midterms approaching, we’re seeing repeated headlines discussing whether President Trump might invoke the Insurrection Act, declare a national emergency, or even impose martial law.
Look at the chronology over the last 30 days:
📅 SEPT 23 — THE ATLANTIC: Reports that Trump allies are urging extraordinary emergency measures surrounding the midterms, including martial law.
📅 SEPT 28 — TIME INTERVIEW: Trump is asked about declaring a national emergency before the elections. He responds: “I don’t rule anything out or in.”
Trump himself raises the Insurrection Act, saying he has never used it but could.
📅 OCT 1 — USA TODAY: Reports that Trump refuses to rule out invoking the Insurrection Act around the elections.
📅 OCT 1 — CNN: Devotes coverage to Trump’s remarks and the possibility of deploying military forces domestically.
📅 OCT 1 — PEOPLE: Reports on Trump’s comments concerning ICE at polling places and the Insurrection Act.
📅 OCT 1–5 — MEDIA SATURATION: A media tracker identifies coverage across 26 outlets discussing Trump’s emergency-powers comments.
📅 OCT 7 — JUST SECURITY: Publishes a legal analysis explaining why invoking the Insurrection Act would not override restrictions on troops at polling places.
📅 OCT 8 — BRENNAN CENTER: Republishes the legal analysis, subsequently updating it October 13.
📅 OCT 16 — AXIOS: Publishes an investigation titled “Trump’s MAGA allies openly discuss martial law,” examining proposals circulating among election activists.
📅 OCT 16 — BRENNAN CENTER: Publishes another analysis specifically addressing Trump’s emergency powers and their constitutional limitations.
AT LEAST 32 MEDIA COVERAGE INSTANCES IDENTIFIED — AND THAT IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE COUNT.
Now here’s my question:
WHY NOW?
Why is this particular discussion suddenly receiving so much attention just weeks before the midterms?
Is the media attempting to frighten voters about what Trump might do?
Is the subject being deliberately normalized so the public becomes familiar with the Insurrection Act and the limits of presidential emergency authority?
Or could the repeated coverage be preparing Americans for a legal and constitutional confrontation surrounding the elections?
Consider the broader convergence we’ve been tracking: DOJ election-integrity litigation, federal voter-roll investigations, cybersecurity preparations, and expanding federal scrutiny of election administration.
All of this is unfolding as the media repeatedly introduces the possibility of extraordinary presidential powers.
MY THEORY: Whether intentional or simply a consequence of escalating political tensions, this saturation of headlines may be conditioning the public to expect an extraordinary confrontation over election security and federal authority.
The timing of this discussion is worth examining.
The question isn’t simply whether Trump WILL invoke the Insurrection Act.
It’s why so many Americans are suddenly being asked to consider that possibility.
And why, of all times, is this conversation intensifying NOW — immediately before the midterms?
Coincidence? Political messaging? Or preparation for a constitutional showdown?
WATCH THE NARRATIVE.
Pete Soudar retweeted
American and Israeli fighter jets carried out maneuvers over Iraq simulating a strike on Iran.
Pete Soudar retweeted
"random assignment"
LOL
All assets deployed.
The U.S. Shadow Government Franchise is really getting worried about LOSING CONTROL OF THAT U.S. SENATE...
Just In today:
The newly filed federal election-related lawsuit by congressional Democratic leaders in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has been assigned to Chief Judge James Boasberg. [1]
Case Overview
Plaintiffs: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic Governors Association, the Nevada Democratic Party, and a naturalized citizen/voter from California. [1, 2]
Defendants: President Donald Trump, the U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Todd Blanche, the Department of Homeland Security, and DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin. [1]
Core Claims: According to reporting from the Associated Press via U.S. News, the suit accuses the administration of illegally attempting to usurp states' rights to administer elections, pressuring states to purge voter rolls, and intimidating local election officials ahead of the November 3 midterms. [1, 2]
Administration Stance: The Justice Department responded that election integrity is a top priority and maintained that all actions taken by the department are grounded in federal law. [1]
Pete Soudar retweeted
The “Greatest Story Never Told” Just Keeps Getting Better - Trump’s economy has produced an all-time record-low poverty rate and record-high household income. Now nearly a million more Americans are working than just two months ago. Time to tell the story.
According to the latest report from the Census Bureau, the poverty rate just hit its lowest level in U.S. history.
Read that again.
That’s not all. America just also hit its highest real median household income in history. The Atlanta Fed’s October 20 estimate puts third-quarter growth at a strong 3.5 percent annual rate. That’s after years of Democrats promising us that 1.6 percent was “the new normal.”
It’s also after barely more than a year and a half of Trump back in office.
It gets even better. Child poverty fell to just 13.4 percent, the lowest official rate ever recorded. Hispanic poverty fell to a record low 13.9 percent. Real weekly earnings for blue-collar manufacturing workers are up 4.1 percent since January 2025; construction workers’ earnings are up an even higher 5 percent.
Now add 975,000 more Americans working in just the last two months.
The household survey recorded an increase of 569,000 in August and another 406,000 in September. The unemployment headline concealed that strength: the labor force grew by more than a million over those two months, pushing unemployment from 4.1 to 4.2 percent because new American workers entered the workforce even faster than employers absorbed them.
It’s kind of a miracle. And it’s gathering steam.
Yet to hear the Enemedia — and some conservatives — talk, the exact opposite is true. To them it’s all “muh gas prices.” Which is funny since the average gas price under Joe Biden was higher than the average during Trump’s second term, even with the war.
Something is seriously amiss.
If incomes are rising faster than prices, it isn’t affordability. It certainly isn’t household wealth. The income figure measures the household in the middle. Elon Musk getting richer can’t drag it upward the way he could an average. And the $2,250 gain in 2025 alone is what remains after adjusting for higher prices.
People who spent years watching inflation eat their raises are finally getting ahead. Dismissing that isn’t showing concern for working families: it’s just myopic. And electing the people who gave you all that inflation — and promised to “skyrocket” energy prices to force everyone into an EV — isn’t even sane.
That GDP number is especially striking. Remember that much ballyhooed 1.5 percent second-quarter headline that had the pundits celebrating Trump’s “failure?” I told you then: they were looking at the wrong number.
What they were seeing wasn’t a slowdown in growth but a capex boom: the private economy spending its output to buy the equipment that would create an industrial supercycle.
Now even that 1.5 percent headline has been revised away. On September 30, the government raised second-quarter growth to 2.2 percent. More importantly, private domestic demand — American consumers and private investment — grew at a 4.6 percent annual rate, stronger than either previous estimate.
The part of the economy I told you to watch was doing even better than we knew.
It’s happening.
The ever-brilliant Larry Kudlow calls the burgeoning boom “the greatest story never told.” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says we’ve entered the “acceleration phase,” as the tax changes and deregulation start to produce the results they were literally designed to produce.
I’ve been explaining that process since early 2025. Yet conservatives continue to buy the left’s lies.
It’s time to stop.
Working Families Are Getting Ahead
Starting with Bill Clinton, America’s ruling class told us manufacturing was gone forever. China would build; we would consume. Russia and the Middle East would supply the energy. Europe would regulate. America would borrow, import, and manage its “inevitable” decline and displacement by more dynamic powers.
Trump rejected every part of that nonsense.
The workers now getting those bigger paychecks have every reason to be glad he did. Their employers aren’t just buying equipment and building new factories: they're bidding up the price of the people who know how to use them. They’re training even more.
Nor is the capex boom ending anytime soon. Trump went out and recruited an incredible $18 trillion of investment into the United States in his first months in office. Equipment shipments have risen at an 18.9 percent annual rate in just the latest three months.
And on September 28th, the President announced the largest steel plant in American history, a $15 billion titan set to begin construction in Iowa.
The President also negotiated trade deals that pried open foreign markets to U.S. manufacturers; he also exempted foreign companies from tariffs if they begin building plants here. And as a condition of those trade deals — now finalized with countries representing 67 percent of global GDP — he forced countless countries accustomed to buying their energy from Russia and the Persian Gulf to buy it from the Gulf of America instead.
The September 30 energy agreement with South Korea, which I highlighted in my October 3 update, puts $200 billion behind that strategy. It includes $54 billion for North Slope natural gas development and a new Trans-Alaska LNG Pipeline to supply the West Coast and our East Asian allies.
Up to 12,000 construction jobs and 1,000 permanent operating jobs will be created from the Alaska project alone.
The Koreans need reliable energy. We have it. Their investment would put Americans to work supplying them for decades.
The construction workers are building the plants and refineries. The roughnecks are drilling the wells. There will be years of work completing them, and much, much more work running them thereafter.
How did that happen? Trump changed the tax code, and thus the incentives for investment. His One Big Beautiful Bill made immediate business expensing permanent for equipment, and added full expensing for qualifying American production facilities.
Combined with unprecedented deregulation plus the trade deals, suddenly there’s no better place to build a factory than right here.
Meanwhile, no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, and no taxes on Social Security (and what sort of obscenity is taxing Social Security anyway?!) help the bottom rung even more than the top.
“Those jobs are never coming back” was a lie, calculated to cover for (intentional) Democrat failures.
There was a time when an American family could live on one breadwinner’s blue-collar wages. That day is coming back, fast.
An economy “growing” at Obama’s stultifying 1.6 percent takes nearly half a century to double. Young people can’t find jobs because they’re already taken: they’re locked out of their futures for half their lifetimes, and locked into dependency on the socialists. That is, after all, the goal.
But an economy growing at 5 percent doubles in size in just 14 years. That translates into so much hiring so fast that labor shortages have to be cured by ever-higher wages. It also translates into so much tax revenue, even at lower rates, that you don’t just reduce the deficit: you start paying off the debt, as we did for four straight years before 9/11.
Folks, this ain’t rocket science. This is the difference between Jimmy Carter’s economy and Ronald Reagan’s. It’s not like we haven’t seen this play before.
Bessent calls it “parallel prosperity.” Wall Street and Main Street can both do well at once. A profitable company is sustainable: it expands, hires people, trains them, and pays them more. An unprofitable company does none of those things.
Yet the “Democratic Socialist” treats the profits that make prosperity possible as an offense, one that must be crushed in the name of “social justice.”
That’s the choice on November’s ballot.
More Production, Less Inflation
Nowhere is that point more obvious than deregulation, anathema to the Democrats. Trump has eliminated 129 regulations for every new one: there’s nothing like it in history. Which party do you think issued most of those in the first place? Not ours.
A company wants to build; it has customers waiting; it can raise the money. But then it spends years waiting for government to let it proceed.
Supposedly the delay protects us. But from what is it protecting us exactly? More goods? Better jobs? The possibility that somebody might make a profit?
In the midst of the Depression, the Empire State Building was completed in just 13 months. Good luck getting a permit in even twice that time in today’s New York.
A process that makes it prohibitively expensive to produce in America sends that production somewhere else. It doesn’t abolish the need for the product. Americans still buy it, but workers in some other country collect the paychecks.
Democrats piled on regulations — and taxes — year after year, amounting to a multi-trillion-dollar burden on the U.S. economy and those pathetic “growth” rates that steal young people’s futures. Trump is rolling them back.
Leftwing economists have long fretted (as they have about global warming, and global cooling, and global overpopulation, and the Ozone hole, and “Peak Oil”, and “two weeks to flatten the curve”) that all this new production will cause inflation.
But this Phillips Curve nonsense was discredited 50 years ago: the truth is exactly the opposite.
Production isn’t the enemy of price stability: it’s the means by which supply catches demand. The answer to a shortage of something Americans need is to make more of it. And if supply is plentiful, prices fall.
American factories are already producing more of what this buildout needs. Durable-goods manufacturing grew at a 3.8 percent annual rate in the third quarter; semiconductor production surged at a 28.4 percent pace.
The answer to demand for more computing power is to manufacture more chips, not make Americans poorer until they stop wanting them.
The same logic applies to energy. An oil-price squeeze strengthens the case for more American supply. It doesn’t make the factories, workers, or families buying that energy the problem. Alaska’s gas will make everyone richer by bringing prices down.
Likewise, the “expert” class assured us that we needed to lower our expectations, that a “mature economy” can only grow at a lower rate: all the dynamic gains must come from developing economies like China’s.
Yet what the heck is a mature economy? If you’d asked anyone in 1900, they’d have said they had one, just before nearly everything we have was invented.
We are entering another such period, with AI and countless other new technologies promising productivity gains beyond anything we’ve ever seen. A worker with better tools can produce much more in the same hour, earning a higher wage without increasing the labor cost of each item he produces.
And like Reagan before him, President Trump has laid a foundation that sets America up to dominate the next half century.
Go Tell Our Story: The Election Is On You
So why aren’t Republicans making this case every day? And no, I don’t mean “the Republicans” in Washington. Trump’s doing more than any President before him. Congress, however flawed, has enacted much of his legislation.
The leaders aren’t the problem. We are.
Historically, the President’s party — whichever President’s party — loses the midterms. But they don’t have to.
Midterms are low-turnout elections, which means “every little thing we do is magic.” No need to appeal to the middle, no need to persuade the socialists. Just talk to your own friends and physically take them to the polls.
To keep the majority, all we need is 1,000 extra votes in 20 House races — just four extra votes per precinct. Want to make a difference? You can. But that also means that if you don’t, you’re responsible.
Republicans need to stop acting like entitled children, and start taking responsibility for their neighbors and their futures. It’s time to tell our story, over and over again.
Record real household income and record-low poverty are a pretty great story to tell. So is the lowest murder rate in 126 years, a 99.9 percent reduction in illegal border crossings, or a thousand other things.
Nearly a million additional Americans working in just two months is a pretty solid answer to those who told us Trump would fail. And the equipment arriving at new American factories gives us every reason to expect more.
This is nothing else but the greatest story never told.
So go and tell it.
Pete Soudar retweeted
The latest release by @DataRepublican show that the seditious conspiracy to create a "crisis of legitimacy" after the midterm elections may now be a treasonous conspiracy to attack the elections itself.
Bringing in subversive foreign agents changed the game entirely.
Pete Soudar retweeted
If you are on Rumble go sub to @sarahadams @The_Watch_Floor channel. Please and Thank you!
From Baghdad to the Green Berets | Steven Al Ebadi's Story rumble.com/v7gq8do-from-bagh…
Pete Soudar retweeted
Great summary. A former Deputy Director of the FBI is as troubled as the rest of us are over what the leftist NGOs are scheming up.
This is SERIOUS. A bunch of anti-Trump leftists appear to be plotting a color revolution to delegitimize and basically take down the U.S. government ⚠️🚨
“The plan is clear. They’re just talking about it now!” — @dbongino
Pete Soudar retweeted
🚨🚨 I went UNDERCOVER on MUSLIM DATING APPS in Dearborn Michigan. Men told me that America is an evil country, expressed desire to fight in Lebanon against Israel, and even volunteered for Jihad.
Abdul El-Sayed wants to give these folks your nation.
Pete Soudar retweeted
This is the set-up: a shaping operation to mould the information environment. They accuse Trump of something in advance, to take that option off the table. If he uses it anyway, they win because he proves them right. If he doesn’t use it, they get to cheat with impunity. A win-win for them.
Pete Soudar retweeted
🚨 UPDATE: TRUMP’s DOJ HAD A CHANCE TO FIX THIS. IT DIDN’T.
13 Republican lawmakers urged the Justice Department to intervene.
DOJ reportedly declined, allowing the ruling to stand.
Think about that.
An employer can advertise specifically for H-1B workers, yet the advertisement alone may not establish a violation of the citizenship-discrimination law.
American workers may need additional evidence of discriminatory hiring.
The administration says American workers come first.
Then why did DOJ let this ruling stand?
@DAGToddBlanche
immigration-analytics.com/20…
🚨 “NO U.S. CITIZENS NEED APPLY.”
Yes, you read that correctly.
A DOJ administrative law judge just ruled in a case involving Boston Consulting Group that a discriminatory job advertisement like this is NOT, by itself, a violation of the federal law protecting Americans from citizenship-status discrimination.
Think about how crazy that is.
If a company posts:
“H-1B WORKERS ONLY”
many Americans will simply never apply.
And according to this ruling, the ad itself may not be enough.
An American worker may have to APPLY, get rejected, and then prove they were rejected because of their citizenship.
The sign tells Americans not to apply.
Then the law may require them to apply anyway to prove discrimination.
DOJ itself has previously gone after employers for discriminatory job advertisements, including ads favoring H-1B and other visa workers.
Now there is a limited window for the Justice Department to act.
The author of a new analysis is calling on Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to step in and vacate or modify the ruling.
He should.
In 2026, there should NEVER be a legal loophole allowing an American company to advertise:
“NO U.S. CITIZENS NEED APPLY.”
@DAGToddBlanche, will DOJ fix this?
cis.org/Fishman/No-Americans…
Pete Soudar retweeted
Part 4 of The Democracy Files was released by @DataRepublican.
Also, @JohnRWoodJr I have lots of questions for you, especially after everything you said when we released our posts exposing Braver Angels role in this network.
Do you still hold the position that Braver Angels isn’t involved? 🧐
Thanks to @iamlisalogan for finding this gem in the thousands of pages of transcripts.
🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 4: YES, MANY ARE AWARE OF THE GOALS 🚨
This one is a thread because there are multiple materials.
On January 15, 2026, Renew American Democracy (RAD), the strategy built around the Democracy Renewal Group's (DRG) ex-USAID democracy officers, held planning exercises for "emergency scenarios" and how it'd affect their "strategic objectives."
RAD's explicit goal is in catalyzing those so-called "emergency scenarios" to manifest "structural reform" - the rewriting of American governance which the previous drops have covered.
RAD/DRG hold the unique role within the wider blocking / protest alliance of defining what the new government looks like, presumably because they are made of ex-USAID officers who have specialized in installing new governments. As @MikeBenzCyber last night said on his stream, these DRG members come from the CIA coup parts of USAID.
It's been suggested that DRG is just a fringe group within the much larger blocking/protest ecosystem. This morning's interim video mentioning Mike Smith disproved that. And PART 4 disproves that further - the wider network is well aware of DRG and that its goal is to secure a new government.
They will dress it in the language that it's Trump who will provoke it, and they're only preventing a true Constitutional crisis. In reality, there's a million ways to interpret what a "red line" is, and many ways to get Trump to cross it. Already, articles everywhere are telegraphing that Trump *will* cross it in the form of the Insurrection Act or martial law, softening us up for the coup ahead.
The materials I'm showing you are from a RAD/DRG-ran planning exercise in January 2026. Groups represented by participants include:
· National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A)
· Freedom Trainers / Beautiful Trouble
· Team Democracy
· Federal Workers Alliance for Democracy
· Civil Service Strong
· Project 2029
· Braver Angels
· Indivisible
· Better Together America
· Center for Collaborative Democracy
· Democracy Accelerator
· Paths to Understanding
· Co-Intelligence Institute
· Cohesion Strategy
· Community-Vision Solutions
One of the working groups concerned "National Deliberations" - which lays the groundwork for structural reforms post-crisis. So every single participant in this forum was well aware the end point is rewriting our governance.
Even more interesting, Tanya Alfredson of @BraverAngels participated in this particular working group - which should give pause to anyone who believes Braver Angels simply wants better dialogue.
As you watch the videos, watch out for the code language they use to hint towards the ultimate end goal.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
Pete Soudar retweeted
Step 1: Dems rig polls to convince the public that the Dems are going to win the midterms
Step 2: Dems lose the midterms
Step 3: Dems/MSM tell public that election must have been rigged because polls said they were supposed to win
Step 4: Dems/MSM begin new psychological operation to convince the public Trump is a dictator that stole the election
Step 5: Dems/MSM attempt to convince public to protest/rise up against Trump
Pete Soudar retweeted
Full on Sedition...
🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 4: YES, MANY ARE AWARE OF THE GOALS 🚨
This one is a thread because there are multiple materials.
On January 15, 2026, Renew American Democracy (RAD), the strategy built around the Democracy Renewal Group's (DRG) ex-USAID democracy officers, held planning exercises for "emergency scenarios" and how it'd affect their "strategic objectives."
RAD's explicit goal is in catalyzing those so-called "emergency scenarios" to manifest "structural reform" - the rewriting of American governance which the previous drops have covered.
RAD/DRG hold the unique role within the wider blocking / protest alliance of defining what the new government looks like, presumably because they are made of ex-USAID officers who have specialized in installing new governments. As @MikeBenzCyber last night said on his stream, these DRG members come from the CIA coup parts of USAID.
It's been suggested that DRG is just a fringe group within the much larger blocking/protest ecosystem. This morning's interim video mentioning Mike Smith disproved that. And PART 4 disproves that further - the wider network is well aware of DRG and that its goal is to secure a new government.
They will dress it in the language that it's Trump who will provoke it, and they're only preventing a true Constitutional crisis. In reality, there's a million ways to interpret what a "red line" is, and many ways to get Trump to cross it. Already, articles everywhere are telegraphing that Trump *will* cross it in the form of the Insurrection Act or martial law, softening us up for the coup ahead.
The materials I'm showing you are from a RAD/DRG-ran planning exercise in January 2026. Groups represented by participants include:
· National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A)
· Freedom Trainers / Beautiful Trouble
· Team Democracy
· Federal Workers Alliance for Democracy
· Civil Service Strong
· Project 2029
· Braver Angels
· Indivisible
· Better Together America
· Center for Collaborative Democracy
· Democracy Accelerator
· Paths to Understanding
· Co-Intelligence Institute
· Cohesion Strategy
· Community-Vision Solutions
One of the working groups concerned "National Deliberations" - which lays the groundwork for structural reforms post-crisis. So every single participant in this forum was well aware the end point is rewriting our governance.
Even more interesting, Tanya Alfredson of @BraverAngels participated in this particular working group - which should give pause to anyone who believes Braver Angels simply wants better dialogue.
As you watch the videos, watch out for the code language they use to hint towards the ultimate end goal.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
Pete Soudar retweeted
Americans need to pay very close attention to this allegation.
We are being told that former government officials, ambassadors, veterans, and nongovernmental organizations have been recorded discussing plans to declare our elected government illegitimate after the midterm elections.
If that recording is authentic and the allegations are accurate, the American people deserve the names, the complete recording, and an explanation of precisely what these individuals intend to accomplish.
There is something profoundly disquieting about politically connected individuals potentially deciding that an election only confers legitimacy when their preferred side prevails.
Our constitutional republic does not belong to political organizations, former officials, or ideological movements. It belongs to the American people.
Release the evidence. Identify the participants. Let the public examine the facts.
No political faction gets to appoint itself the final authority over the American electorate.
#AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks
Pete Soudar retweeted
Listen to former USAID official Danielle Reiff’s discussion with retired Rear Admiral Mike Smith, who allegedly felt confident about overthrowing President Trump before January 3.
The military/police is one of six pillars in the Pillars of Support training materials promoted by Horizons Project/Freedom Trainers.
Consider this Democracy Files 3.5.
Note in the video that they are pretty confident that a "breakthrough" will happen that gets rid of Trump sometime between now and January 3rd, and Mike Smith allegedly acknowledges RAD's role in writing the government that comes after.
Another drop coming later this morning.
Pete Soudar retweeted
Very, very dangerous! The farm has produced thousands just like her, i.e., Abigail Spanberger.
Understand, MKULTRA may have been killed, but its legacy lives on.
Honestly, today, in 2026, it’s less a brand and more a portfolio: CIA Labs, behavioral science units inside the Agency, and a web of DARPA/ARI/academic grants.
The word “MKULTRA” was a codename; today it’s just “behavioral research,” “human performance,” and “cognitive science” — less sexy, more funded, and responsible for the likes of Elissa Slotkins and Abigail Spanbergers. ☠️
There’s no such thing as “due process rights” for foreigners.
Committing a single crime, earns you a forced deportation and prevents you from ever entering into our country again.
HUGE WINNING!!
🚨 SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT REENTRY FOR NONCITIZENS:
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that the Trump administration holds authority to block foreign individuals with criminal records from reentering the United States. Supporters praise the ruling as a major victory for border security and public safety. Critics argue that expanding executive discretion risks infringing on due process rights for lawful residents.
I FIRMLY SUPPORT THIS 100%👍👍
Pete Soudar retweeted
🚨🇮🇷 A catastrophic explosion and massive fire just ripped through Production Line 6 at the Iranian Aluminium Company (IRALCO) in Arak - the crown jewel of Iran’s metallurgy sector.
👉Both the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the regular Iranian Army rely heavily on raw materials from IRALCO to manufacture critical defense components, ranging from advanced ballistic missile casings and drone airframes to conventional military hardware and armored vehicle plating.
Pete Soudar retweeted
860 PACs Smurfing in 2026 alone, here are 50 of them - click on image and zoom up. From our new site: fecvisual.com






































