Philip Read retweeted
They were announced in January. They’re being reannounced today because Big Green (RWE) and Big Capitalism (KKR), who will benefit from the massive state subsidies already being poured into these projects, have demanded more (to cover rising costs of developing offshore wind). So Labour has obliged with another £1 billion from the so-called National Wealth [Destruction] Fund. Life is truly grand for the crony capitalists.
IN FULL: The Innocuous order-order.com/2026/11/11/i… via @guidofawkes
1
51
Philip Read retweeted
This is government gaslighting to a high degree.
1. It’s not a new announcement. The Norfolk East and West offshore wind projects were announced earlier this year as part of the AR7 round of contracts.
2. No way does it bring down prices. Those behind it, energy giant RWE + global investors KKR, were guaranteed an above-market strike price of £91.20/MWh based on 2024 prices — indexed linked for 20 years. That guarantee is already worth £97/MWh in 2026. This is v expensive energy.
3. What is new is that the costs of developing offshore wind have soared. So the government has now had to chip in £1 billion of the £12 billion investment needed from the National Wealth [Destruction] Fund. So more state subsidy on top of the massive subsidies for two foreign companies implicit in the price guarantees embedded in AR7.
4. Far from cheaper electricity this embeds high-cost electricity in the system for 20 years.
5. So much for the Chancellor’s Budget pledge to ‘only build new projects when they lower prices’. This does the opposite — and at enormous expense to the taxpayer and electricity user.
Gaslighting indeed.
Philip Read retweeted
African Tippu Tip owned roughly 10,000 slaves in the 1890s. That was decades after the American Civil War, the Emancipation Proclamation, and the 13th Amendment.
While white European societies had already abolished the slave trade and then slavery itself this man was still marching deep into Central Africa, burning villages, chaining captives, and selling them.
Tippu Tip became a famous slave and ivory trader of the East African interior. He led armed caravans of thousands of men hundreds of miles inland, raiding villages at dawn, killing the weak or elderly on the spot, and marching the rest in coffles to the coast. Roughly one-third of the captives often died on the journey.
The survivors were sold for Zanzibar’s clove plantations, for domestic service, and for export to the Arabian Peninsula and the Gulf. Women and girls were routinely taken as sex slaves and concubines—standard practice in the Arab trade for centuries.
By 1895 he controlled seven plantations worked by about 10,000 slaves. He built a personal commercial and political domain in the eastern Congo, confirmed or replaced local chiefs, monopolized the ivory trade, and became one of the richest men of his era.
He assisted European explorers when it suited him, then watched from comfortable retirement in Zanzibar as European powers finished suppressing the trade he had helped expand. He died in 1905.
This photograph of him seated in turban and robes, staff in hand, is the classic image of the merchant who got rich selling other Africans.
You can earn a degree in African American studies and never hear Tippu Tip’s name, or the names of the African kings and Arab traders who actually captured and sold Africans who crossed the Atlantic or the Indian. Today’s universities treat the Arab and Swahili caravan Slave traders as footnotes or ignored entirely.
This is not an accident. Acknowledging that African elites and Middle Eastern buyers ran the supply side for centuries undercuts the simple narrative that frames slavery as a uniquely white-European or American invention.
British whites abolished the slave trade in 1807 and slavery in its colonies in 1833, then spent decades and enormous resources on naval patrols to stop the trade. The United States followed in 1865. These white societies were among the first large-scale institutional and systematic bans on slavery in history.
Slavery and the open slave trade continued in Africa and the Islamic world long afterward. Legal chattel slavery was abolished in Saudi Arabia only in 1962; Mauritania was the last country to ban it on paper, in 1981. Tippu Tip’s operation in the 1880s and 1890s was not a dying remnant; it was still large, profitable, and expanding under Arab-Swahili leadership.
The peak slave population in the United States in 1860 was about 3.95 million. Modern estimates of people in forced labor, forced marriage, and other forms of modern slavery put the global total near 50 million TODAY!!!.
Africa alone accounts for millions of slaves TODAY; the Arab states also show some of the highest prevalence rates in the world TODAY. Absolute numbers of people in modern slavery in Africa and the Middle East today exceed the peak historical figure for the United States. Definitions differ—historical chattel slavery is not identical to every form of forced marriage or debt bondage—but the scale of ongoing exploitation is not small.
Tippu Tip was certainly not the only African slave trader. Arab and Swahili traders from Zanzibar and the Omani sphere ran the East African trade for generations, selling captives north into the Middle East for labor, military service.
European societies were among the first to abolish slavery and enforce the ban. That fact is routinely omitted from the version of history taught in American universities. The men who owned ten thousand slaves in the 1890s while marching deep into the African interior should not be ignored. -RJ
Philip Read retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: APPEAL AGAINST ISLAMIC BLASPHEMY CODE
This Friday, FSU member Stephen Gray will appeal his conviction at the Crown Court for reposting a meme critical of Islam.
Stephen, a retired police officer with nearly 30 years’ service, reposted a meme that had already been shared thousands of times: “Fun facts about bacon! People who eat bacon have a lower chance of marrying a 9-year-old!”
The post referred to the Prophet Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. According to the Hadiths, she was six when they married and nine when the marriage was consummated. Stephen says the post was satirical, but he also hoped it would prompt serious debate about whether that marriage has helped make child marriage acceptable in parts of the Muslim world.
The CPS initially decided not to charge him. After the complainant appealed, the decision was reviewed and Stephen was prosecuted under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 for sending a “grossly offensive” message. In April, District Judge Steven Hood convicted him. The judge found that the post could not be making a serious point because it was light-hearted. Stephen was ordered to pay more than £1,000.
Parliament abolished the blasphemy laws in England and Wales in 2008. They should not return through the back door, and they certainly should not protect one religion alone. Criticising Islam, or any faith, is not a crime. Nor is reposting a joke that some people find offensive.
The Free Speech Union has instructed John Beggs KC to represent Stephen. We have done this before: we funded Hamit Coskun’s defence and secured the overturning of his conviction on appeal. We then beat the CPS when it tried to challenge his acquittal.
Cases like this are expensive. Please donate to Stephen’s crowdfunder at the link below 👇
Philip Read retweeted
Bexleyheath Ward councillors joined many residents and local groups including the Royal British Legion remembering those who sacrificed their lives for the freedom we have today. @PoppyLegion @bexleynews
Philip Read retweeted
It is time for the Government to choose parents over Stonewall. The Conversion Practices Bill will give trans activists free rein to harm children, says Celia Walden.
MPs and peers scrutinising the Bill have a duty to listen to detransitioners as they consider its implications. They must also listen to parents.
Under the Bill, parents could face up to five years in prison for having a conversation with their gender-confused child.
That makes it all the more important for parliamentarians to hear from people who transitioned while vulnerable and later regretted it, as well as from parents who have had to navigate this difficult path.
We live in the post-Cass Review era, which exposed how badly children had been let down by gender identity services in this country. Yet the Government appears to have learnt nothing. Children and parents will pay the price.
Michael Kerr began taking cross-sex hormones after being sexually assaulted at 18. As he spiralled into drug and alcohol addiction, he sought solace in transitioning. He later realised it was not “the answer”. His request to give evidence to the Joint Committee scrutinising the Bill was ignored.
Jenny, whose 13-year-old daughter decided to transition during lockdown, was accused of being abusive when she tried to talk to her. Her request to give evidence was denied.
The Committee must not cherry-pick the evidence it hears. Parents and detransitioners must be included.
This Bill will silence parents trying to care for their children and hurt the very people it claims to protect.
Read more in @Telegraph 👇
Philip Read retweeted
Labour’s Lucy Powell, trying to explain why she was complicit on Ed Miliband interview with Brand in 2015, says a)it was before social media; and b) there was no easy way of checking on people in these days.
Which is strange since a) she’d been on social media since 2009 and by 2015 it was in full swing; and b) Google has been available since 2000.
Other than that her explanation is entirely credible.
Russell Brand: The shameful truth about those who turned a blind eye
youtu.be/5hfFwqW_e9s?si=2gXy… via @YouTube
Philip Read retweeted
“The headmaster folded like a badly made deckchair and threw him under the bus.”
A teacher from Batley has been in hiding for five years after showing his religious studies class a cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad during a lesson about the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
On this week’s episode of the FSU Podcast, FSU Director of Policy and Research @DavidRoseUK speaks to the teacher’s friend, local activist Paul Halloran.
Paul describes how the school’s leadership responded when protesters gathered at the gates: no public statement, no defence of a lesson the school itself had approved, and a suspension for the teacher who delivered it.
Watch the full episode on the FSU YouTube channel 👇
Philip Read retweeted
The Labour Government’s decision to introduce an “anti-Muslim hostility” definition has helped embed a de facto Islamic blasphemy law in British society.
Blasphemy laws were abolished in England and Wales in 2008 because they are fundamentally opposed to liberal democratic principles. Labour has brought them back through the back door for Islam alone. Criticism of Islam can now carry serious consequences, including prosecution, ostracism and cancellation.
This blasphemy law has been introduced without Parliament’s approval, yet it is being enforced by the police and courts.
At the Free Speech Union, we are uniquely placed to see the scale of the problem facing the country.
Stephen Gray, an FSU member and former police officer of 27 years, was charged with being “grossly offensive” — an offence under the Communications Act 2003 — for sharing a joke on Facebook mocking the Prophet Muhammad. The image showed a rasher of bacon and a man wearing a turban, alongside the text: “Fun facts about bacon! People who eat bacon have a lower chance of marrying a nine-year-old”. Mr Gray was fined more than £1,000 in fines and costs and now has a criminal record.
The Free Speech Union is supporting Stephen in his appeal, which is due to be heard on 13 November.
Another case is that of Kellie-Jay Keen, the women’s rights campaigner, who was charged under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 over posts on X criticising Islam, Muslim cultural practices and Islamism. @SpeechUnion is also supporting @ThePosieParker.
It is not a crime to criticise a religion. No religion should be shielded from legitimate challenge, debate or criticism in a free society.
Speaking to Hardeep Singh, the Free Speech Union’s Director of Case Management, Dr Ben Jones said that, in the eyes of the state, it is clear that we cannot criticise Islam.
Since Labour came to power in 2024, the number of people seeking help from the Free Speech Union after getting into trouble over comments relating to Islam has risen fourfold. @BenBarryJones said: “We’ve had the state, in the form of the Crown Prosecution Service, attempt to charge a man for causing ‘harassment, alarm or distress’ to what it called ‘the religious institution of Islam’”.
As a result of the “anti-Muslim hostility” definition, the number of cases will inevitably grow.
But the risks facing those who criticise Islam are not limited to prosecution and cancellation. For many, it can be a matter of life and death. Consider the religious studies teacher at Batley Grammar School, who was forced into hiding after showing his class a cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad while discussing the massacre of journalists at Charlie Hebdo in Paris.
A false accusation of blasphemy also cost Samuel Paty, a French schoolteacher, his life.
We must not let an Islamic blasphemy law take root.
Read more below in @TheCriticMag 👇
Philip Read retweeted
Kemi Badenoch today threw down the gauntlet to Andy Burnham over welfare, as she set out plans to slash £36 billion from the bill.
The Tory leader, flanked by shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately, warned that the Prime Minister 'lacks the will and he lacks the support of his party to even try to cut welfare'.
She decried that the £180 billion annual bill amounted to more than the entire GDP of Ukraine and more than £4,000 for every UK taxpayer.
Badenoch also pointed to the fact that 'double amputees run marathons' and autistic men lead some of the world's most successful tech giants as evidence that disability benefits have become something of a free-for-all.
✍️ Noa Hoffman
Article | spectator.com/article/badeno… | @hoffman_noa
Philip Read retweeted
So Labour wants HMRC to be able to take money directly out of your bank account and will enable energy companies to have access to your tax records in order to try and divert resources to benefits claimants, but has banned officials from checking the savings of those benefits claimants.
Chancellor Healey has scrapped a proposal that would have allowed officials at the Department for Work and Pensions to help root out benefit fraud by seeing the savings of people trying to claim benefits.
This says everything about Labour's priorities and reminds us that benefits claimants are a large part of its voter base.
Philip Read retweeted
Former chief prosecutor Lord Macdonald KC has warned that the Conversion Practices Bill violates the rule of law.
He says the draft bill is so vague that parents may not know whether an honest conversation with their child could amount to a criminal offence punishable by up to five years in prison. One principle of the rule of law, he argues, is that people should be able to tell whether their actions are criminal.
Lord Macdonald led the Crown Prosecution Service from 2003 to 2008 and now sits as a crossbench peer. He is the latest senior figure to criticise the bill, echoing the Free Speech Union’s argument that abusive conversion practices are already illegal.
He believes the bill is an attempt by the trans lobby to secure legislative change through the back door. He told The Telegraph:
“I don’t think it criminalises anything that isn’t already criminal. The minister in the House of Lords was asked to explain what it was that was presently not criminal, that would be criminalised by the legislation.
“And he said that will come out in pre-legislative scrutiny, which is unprecedented. If the minister can’t explain what it is that’s presently lawful that the bill is going to make unlawful, that means there’s a serious problem with the bill, frankly.”
Read more below in @Telegraph 👇
Philip Read retweeted
You only need to look at Swinney's hysterical bluster and weasel words to see @HarrietCross_MP has him bang to rights.
You can celebrate a Sikh festival and Remembrance Sunday on the same day. But shouting "Bandi Chhor Divas!" during the 2 minute silence is cringe and disrespectful.
An SNP government so desperate to look inclusive, instead exposed its extraordinary cultural ignorance. Thousands of Sikh soldiers fought and died alongside British servicemen in two World Wars. Their sacrifice is part of our shared national history. Remembrance Sunday belongs to them too.
As people of every colour, faith and background fell silent to remember those who died for our freedom. The SNP govt's official account wanted to make it extremely clear to everyone that it had a different message to send.
What they posted at 11am was so naff, it might as well have said "Remembrance Sunday is for everyone else. You minorities can have your own little celebrations." to match the levels of extreme crassness and condescension.
Ethnic minorities don't need the SNP's performative gestures or patronising crumbs.
This is the poisonous consequence of politicians who see people as separate groups to be managed and patronised, rather than fellow citizens united by a common country and shared traditions.
The SNP talks endlessly about inclusion while displaying a remarkable inability to understand what actually unites us.
John Swinney laid a wreath on Sunday. Good. Now he should explain how the Government he leads managed to get this so spectacularly wrong.
Philip Read retweeted
75% of constituencies in England and Wales spend more on welfare than their workers pay in income tax and National Insurance. London and the South East are the only regions that are net contributors; the North East is the most welfare-dependent region in England.
Explore the ASI's new Welfare Sustainability Tracker at buff.ly/ltyWwQH
Philip Read retweeted
Best description I've heard of Labour's tax on private schools:
"A tax that raises less than it costs isn’t a tax.
It’s spite with a spreadsheet.
Aimed at the parents who sacrificed, and dressed up as fairness."
Businessman Alex Lovén in Times interview.
Philip Read retweeted
Train delays have increased since Labour nationalised the railways.
It was predictable, and predicted.
Labour’s obsession with increasing an already bloated state bureaucracy hurts the very people it is meant to help.
We need better government, not bigger government.
Philip Read retweeted
Last Thursday, Andy Burnham’s used a private jet flight go from London to Manchester to watch an Everton game.
In 2023, Rachel Reeves said that Labour would "crack down on Tory ministers’ private jet habit."
If an opponent did this, people like Angela Rayner would be furious.
Philip Read retweeted
Britain's 'strictest headmistress' @Miss_Snuffy says our obsession with celebrating the ethnic heritage of children - while feeling shame at Britain's history - is wrong, divisive and may end in civil unrest






























