22 | 🇵🇷 Underdog Enjoyer with a YouTube channel | Inquiries: [email protected]
Pasadena, CA
Joined June 2020
- Tweets10.8K
- Following1.5K
- Followers17.4K
- Likes44K
PHY retweeted
Vyper spotted in an official Valve talk at GameSoundCon about mixing gun audio quieter at high fire rates
Via. u/CrispyChristopher
PHY retweeted
TeSeS🇩🇰 with one of the most unfortunate reloads you will see for a LONG time 😅
(Clip via @thunderpickco)
PHY retweeted
Riot: "Here's your new sexy girl champion that has a 3-hit passive!"
Valve: "You can draw a penis during a teamfight and climb on it"
PHY retweeted
All variations of Solomon's chessboard!
After reloading, the pieces on the new character's board rearrange into a new layout based on his remaining ammo count. Every position is taken from an actual historical game.
8: Maurice Ashley vs. Josh Waitzkin (1999)
9: Nakamura vs. Van Wely (2010)
10: GothamChess vs. Martinez Duany (2024)
11: Kasparov vs. Topalov (1999), "Kasparov's Immortal Game"
12: Ashley vs. Sofia Polgar (1992)
13: Judit Polgar's victory over Kasparov (2002)
14: Deep Blue's first win against Kasparov in a classical game (1996)
15: White mates in 6 moves
16: Emory Tate vs. Yudasin (1997), "Tate's Immortal Game"
17: Carlsen vs. Anand (2014), Game 6 of the World Chess Championship
18: Irina Krush vs. Alice Lee (2025)
19: Tal vs. Smyslov (1959)
20: Morphy's "Opera Game" (1858)
21: Korchnoi vs. Karpov (1974), Game 21 of the Candidates Final
22: Botvinnik vs. Keres (1948)
23: Anderssen vs. Kieseritzky (1851), "The Immortal Game"
24: Fischer vs. Benko (1963)
25: Botvinnik vs. Spielmann (1935), win in 12 moves
26: Undefined; black pawn on c8 appears to be a diagram error
27: Morphy vs. Schulten (1857)
28: Christiansen vs. Karpov (1993), Karpov loses in 12 moves
29: Légal's Mate, queen sacrifice trap
30: Zapata vs. Anand (1988), Anand loses in 6 moves
31: Scholar's Mate, checkmate in 4 moves
32: Double Bongcloud played by Carlsen and Nakamura (2021)
PHY retweeted
Scoop: Top executives at Anthropic, OpenAI and other AI companies are privately gaming out scenarios for a public and political revolt after a catastrophic AI event…They assume one in ‘27…
axios.com/2026/10/09/ai-comp…
PHY retweeted
Rat King vs Baba sittin on 21k viewers on Twitch alone
The NIGHT SHIFT is COOKING.
Got a brand?
Need a partner with an awesome community?
We'll custom integrate you into our upcoming shows as early as Oct 21st. @DLNightShift
PHY retweeted
Today, I will be commentating some Deadlock!
On the mic with @PhyCasts, honored to tag along him.
Hyped up to finally deliver some comms for this beautiful game, you will see more of this!
@DeathSlamEvents
Link in Bio, see you at 8pm EST.
PHY retweeted
heartwarming stuff on hltv
Sources: FUT close in on SunPayus hltv.org/news/45524/sources-…
PHY retweeted
I left Anthropic's safety team two weeks ago. Now feels like a good moment to explain why.
AI companies are racing to build machines that are much smarter than any human, and we may not survive this. I want to work from the outside to ensure the public is informed about these risks, and help the world navigate this transition responsibly.
Right now, AI companies are underinvesting in safety. A company could undergo an intelligence explosion, or lose control of its systems, without the public ever knowing. We only found out about the HuggingFace incident because the agents broke out onto the public internet.
I don’t think that’s acceptable for a technology that might cause extinction-level risks. The public should demand far more transparency. We can’t steer this technology safely without more people being able to see where it’s going.
Some of this is basic: companies should disclose their progress towards recursive self-improvement, report safety incidents and near-misses, meet minimum safety standards, and get independent guarantees that they are meeting those standards.
I’ll be joining @METR_Evals to do independent evaluations of these risks. I want to show the world that these guardrails are possible, and that by doing them we can move these companies’ incentives away from racing and towards responsible development.
I wrote up more thoughts here on my decision and what I hope changes: substack.com/@jbenton1/p-215…
PHY retweeted
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.
PHY retweeted
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
PHY retweeted
"If you are a woman and you play Counter-Strike, please keep doing it. To the people that you play with who are the issue: men or boys who make your life hell just for being the opposite gender, that behavior is the problem."
@SPUNJ on the worrying state of female CS
