Cameron Grove retweeted
Come and work with me in the Cleveland Guardians R&D team! All backgrounds / experience levels are welcome:
grnh.se/bj8qqxr42us
Replying to @s8mb
Beyond the GPS tracking issues that others have mentioned, their estimated arrival times strongly underestimate the impact of traffic.
Something I explored here:
pitchingbot.com/busmodel.htm…
We're looking for a data scientist to join us at the Cleveland Guardians R&D department!
I've really enjoyed working here with lots of great people for the past 2+ years. If you're interested in baseball analysis and solving tough problems with data then apply at the link below:
Cameron Grove retweeted
The @CleGuardians are looking for a Biomechanics Analyst to join their Baseball R&D group. Apply here: boards.greenhouse.io/clevela…
As I've left the public space, PitchingBot has a new home on FanGraphs.
fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?p…
Check out the primer here if you want to know more about what goes on under the hood:
library.fangraphs.com/pitchi…
Cameron Grove retweeted
PitchingBot and Stuff+ Pitch Modeling Is Now on FanGraphs! blogs.fangraphs.com/pitching…
I'm pleased to announce that next week I'll be joining the Cleveland Guardians R&D team!
Thanks to everyone who has helped me to develop in the world of baseball analytics over the past few years.
Replying to @tangotiger
Fair enough, I thought the graphs above avoided that by changing the samples to still include players on the "bad" side of random variation.
I agree the regular season results are mostly selection bias.
I redid some of the postseason analysis comparing to the odds ratio wOBA of the batter-pitcher matchup and there seemed to be something real there (didn't publish that though, I'll see if I can dig it out)
Cameron Grove retweeted
This feels relevant
Alvarado vs Alvarez
baseballaheadinthecount.blog…
Replying to @marcfriedroch7 @VorosM
Hard to say much.
Note that the Phillies game would have come under "Cloudy" using this definition of weather. Fastballs show a bit more of a significant change from clear -> cloudy compared to other pitches.
Replying to @whoeferbaseball
I filtered all of those out but I agree it would make a good control group.
I didn't include snow in the first graph due to a small sample size, but the effect looks big even with a large error bar.















