New video! Trump Just Made a MASSIVE UFO PROMISE youtu.be/K2uqIFvb6cM

How long before “AI is an asshole” becomes a household phrase?

Cool

“You always own the option of having no opinion. There is never any need to get worked up or to trouble your soul about things you can't control. These things are not asking to be judged by you. Leave them alone.” — Marcus Aurelius

Artificial Super Intelligence & Disclosure on the horizon…

If Trump can’t unravel the UFO cover-up, then we don’t have a representative government.

I find the Jim Ryder revelation from Stratton's book absolutely fascinating

The extraordinary irony is that some ufologists who emphasize experiencers have truly dropped the ball on disclosure. They don’t understand disclosure. Their cynicism of it has blinded them to the truth. They even think disclosure threatens understanding of the phenomenon or the world's progress. As if the cover-up is more conducive to revelation. This couldn’t be further from the truth. As I see it, disclosure is a radical spiritual upheaval of the human experience and psyche. In fact, we could say that disclosure makes all eight billion of us experiencers. This is why I call it a civilizational near-death experience. Just as those who have died and come back are never the same, our civilization will never ever be the same after disclosure. Disclosure is the medicine. It’s destiny. Providence.

Reincarnation can exist even if an ancient religion claims it does not. The converse is true too. Many aspects of reality can exist that religions deem untrue. I think this will be part of the lesson of disclosure. That is, you can’t expect reality to conform to your beliefs.

After UFO Disclosure, the phenomena that people have seen and experienced for eons may become less shy. It makes perfect sense. Over the past 80 years, for example, these phenomena have shown themselves enough to enter the zeitgeist aggressively, but not enough for their presence to radically change the world in the way that only scientific proof of their existence could. After disclosure, their incentive to evade definitive proof of their existence may expire since the proof will already have been well established. This could lead to far more people on our planet having unambiguous experiences with these phenomena, including our scientists. And I suspect that we have some kind of relationship with them that is not well understood, though the legacy program may have more clarity on that. In other words, their interest in us may be deeper than just curiosity about another species, but rooted in something fundamental that we have in common. Think of it this way: Is it a coincidence that we both spend so much time on Earth? After all, the universe is vast.

When David Grusch writes his book after disclosure, the title should be: Disclosure ALPHA

I agree. It's being underweighted.

I'm glad there are atheists. It reveals something: many viewpoints can be rational simultaneously. We think that because we see things a certain way, it is because we are the rational ones. But have we ever stopped to consider that we see things a certain way because of our unique genetics, upbringing, personality, experiences, and other factors completely outside of our control? The fact that this is almost always missed is a terrible blind spot that our society has. Maybe because society wants to think free will is simple, black and white, and always the result of our moral standing. Wrong. Dead wrong.

Saying this is a contradiction isn't my personal takeaway. But @ProfAviLoeb has an excellent point nevertheless, and it's these exact kinds of conversations that pressure the cover-up. How could there be a UFO back-engineering Cold War between adversaries, and yet the president of the United States isn't told about it? Thinking the cover-up makes sense is the first mistake.

What's so dumb about the idea that governmental disclosure is only deception is that it implies ufology is the truth. No, friend, this is not how this works. THE WHOLE DAMN THING IS DEBATABLE. Your favorite ufologist may be wrong about many issues, functionally deceiving the public about UFOs. Why we have failed is because ufology has remained fringe, in echo chambers, and outside our institutions and our global conversation. The solution is sunlight, not cover-up. Let's do the science. Let's debate. Let's break this shit wide open.

Don’t walk on eggshells because the person getting offended may be wrong about their conviction and benefit from your opinion.

Tell me more

As I read Jay Stratton's book, I'm realizing how profoundly misguided it is that some people are upset he's selling a book. A book is one of the best mediums to share information with the public on sensitive, nuanced issues like UFOs. In fact, without the book, would he have been asked to be interviewed by so many media outlets? Nobody will invest hundreds of hours writing a book without financial compensation. And expecting that of anyone is not only unfair, but brutally unrealistic. As you were.

It's hard to have a conversation with someone who KNOWS the truth. Before we talk about our differences, let's both be open to being wrong. Otherwise, I'm not here to play a supporting role in your delusion of infallibility.

One of the most interesting questions to ask the UFO legacy program: How many craft do you estimate are in our skies and seas at any given moment? And how many non-human beings are there inside our biosphere at any given moment? How big is this “population”?