Professor Rants (@ProfRants) header
Professor Rants (@ProfRants) profile picture

Cathartic rants on culture and entertainment. Join me for some after hours streams. Warning, we will keep it 💯 Engineer, MS, Researcher

The Grand Ole South
Joined October 2022
Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)Photo by Professor Rants (@ProfRants)
Professor Rants retweeted
This is unbelievably pathetic, dishonest, and cowardly, but it's the angle that the neo cons are taking. Trump launched a pointless and unpopular war. People like this were cheerleaders for it. We told them it would be a disaster and we were right. And now that we've been 100 percent vindicated and proven correct, the very disaster that we warned against and predicted is actually our fault because we failed to "frame the Iran war as necessary." It's not Trump's fault for launching the war. It's not his fault for failing to make a compelling argument for it. It's not the fault of the people who promoted the war and waved their pompoms for it. No it's our fault for not ignoring our own convictions and obediently getting in line with Trump and doing what he tells us. Yes the responsibility to make a persuasive argument for Trump's war falls not on Trump himself or on the war's biggest fans but on the conservative critics of the war. This is so deluded and cultish and backwards that I want to say I'm shocked, but I'm actually not shocked at all. These people will twist an contort themselves into any shape to avoid any and all accountability. Pathetic. Grotesque.
The messaging from conservatives like Matt Walsh over the last 6 months is a major reason the GOP lost control of Congress. Matt Walsh and co. have the platform to frame the Iran war as one that is necessary, but chose to undercut Trump and help Democrats. The conflict with Iran is not pointless. Iran had the time, the intent, and the resources to build a nuke. The point of the war is to remove the time and/or resource variables. Ignoring the nuclear Iran risk would not have made the problem disappear. Rather, it would have just deferred the issue to the next president—a far less capable commander in chief. That Trump handle this issue now, rather than leaving a nuclear-threshold Iran for an AOC, Harris, or Newsom administration in 2028, is in our best national interest. Trump’s “no new wars” stance reflected a preference against open-ended nation-building and wars. It didn’t mean he’d pretend Iran didn’t have the time, intentions, and resources to create a nuke and kick it to a less capable president in a few years.
1,039
804
86
13,344
632,053
Professor Rants retweeted
PROPOSED: "Emotional Intelligence" (and its various demographic variations) is just a social fabrication necessitated by the cruel reality that actual 140 IQ super-productive members of society are compelled to pretend that people proffering to be "peers" and "managers" and "HR" and who are actually just sub-100 IQ NPCs incapable of foreseeing third- or even second-order consequences, but they are socially favored demographics whom you are prohibited from correctly calling out, so they needed a made-up label to falsely label them as being "smart." DISCUSS.
124
100
14
1,112
32,981
Fair point, but people really don’t like being held hostage. Personally, I can’t vote for Graham in SC. Everyone hates us white males, so fuck em. Basically a choice between a slow blood letting and an execution at this point.
I never give voting advice and I don’t like to answer "what should I do questions". It's not my job. My job is to ask you that. But not sure I can't answer, "what I am going to do" questions. There's a difference between a party that lets down its voters, even betrays them over issues, and a party that imprisons and kills my friends. That answer your question?
6
Professor Rants retweeted
If you're the whole package: Tall, rich, kind, handsome. It's actually an obstacle to a quick hookup. There has to be something "wrong" with you for a woman to justify hooking up with you and moving on. Try out some of these starter flaws: - Overly tattooed - Broke - Asshole - Flirts with too many other girls Anything that screams "I'm not marriage material" Otherwise she will try to make you wait.
21
29
5
502
39,985
Professor Rants retweeted
Who can relate to this? lol 🙋‍♂️
26
24
9
399
21,389
The number one ability to teach your children is “strategic empathy”. The ability to be in another’s shoes and understand what they want and their motivations. If you are constantly being surprised by another’s actions, recalibrate what the motivations of another might be.
9
Universally great advice, never in writing, always in cash
JUMBOTRON RULE is always in effect. Give these sluts NOTHING to work with.
8
It is truly baffling that the information can be told to you from the source online, men can talk about numerous IRL experience, movies and TV can say “Hey, here it is!” and guys like this are just like “nah”. Research is useless if it isn’t predictive for normal people.
Men are learning about women from stories designed to make them angry. You see guys take these unusual interactions, where a woman suddenly loses interest or ghosts them, and write elaborate, attention-grabbing stories. Then those stories go viral. But part of the reason they go viral is that they’re unusual. If you see something like, “Hey, I met this girl, we really liked each other, and now we’re engaged. We’re getting married.” That might get 17 likes. But if you post, “I had a one-night stand with this girl, and then she ghosted me,” or, “She was leading me on through the app, agreed to meet me, and then stopped talking to me,” and you add, “It’s over, boys,” that’s the story that goes viral. The other point is that the relatively small group of women who are more promiscuous are highly sought after by men looking for casual sex. Very attractive men have access to that group. Less attractive men see this, get jealous, and want access to the same group. But they mistakenly think that’s all women, without realizing that the majority of women have had either zero or one partner within the past 12 months. It’s a kind of availability bias. You see all this stuff online, all the chatter about sex and chads and so on, and assume that’s what everyone is doing. But you’re not seeing this “dark matter” of women who aren’t posting, who aren’t on the apps, who are just living their lives.
1
30
Locked comments doing a lot of work
This has the potential to be disastrous for the tech innovation in the U.S.. It means Microsoft cannot sponsor green cards and it could expand to other major firms. No new top talent almost all of which has advanced degrees in STEM.
21
Professor Rants retweeted
She was ashamed of her own behavior and slowly over the course of weeks decided that she was actually raped. The final straw was being uninvited from a party at the frat. This is an embarrassed, resentful woman using a rape claim to save face. A tale as old as time. She should be in prison for making these false allegations. But of course our system is designed to protect lying, manipulative women like her.
New dispatch on the Cornell case from the NYT is pretty extraordinary
245
1,105
35
12,723
357,111
My entire consulting career has just been: > Take a “dysfunctional, unfixable” team. > Fire the toxic female/minority manager. > Replace them with a boring White guy. It has never once failed. Corporate America could save trillions by just hiring Chuds.
Notice how Trump removed two women (Bondi and Noem) and replaced them with two men (Blanche and Mullin) and both departments started operating exceptionally more efficiently and effective.
153
1,864
50
34,220
979,855
It’s mostly about the feminist takeover of the church. The catering to the female is absurd. Weak, pathetic, simps that’s how I think of Christian men.
10 minutes and 43 seconds highlighting why the Body of Christ is suffering so badly in America. The perversion of scripture via politics—specifically, a twisted use of it to justify foolish and immoral foreign policy, hypocrisy and being judgmental. Those are the three cited.
22
lol women have got some issues man
Instagram now lets you blur people in your stories to help ‘soft launch’ a relationship The new AI tool lets you choose exactly how pixelated they are
12
He found a chick who was less annoying.
This quoted post is unavailable.
8
Professor Rants retweeted
OpenAI and Anthropic oversold AI security breaches to pressure feds into protecting turf: insiders trib.al/Jo6xMk5
671
2,078
937
11,078
4,327,831
It’s just mockery at this point. It’s a victory lap of epic proportions.
Meryl Streep will officially voice Aslan in Greta Gerwig’s ‘NARNIA: THE MAGICIAN'S NEPHEW’. 🔗 empireonline.com/movies/news…
12
Professor Rants retweeted
Okay, maybe AI is not so bad after all... 💀
360
3,105
251
29,959
2,076,393
Professor Rants retweeted
LMFAO!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
612
5,673
651
31,005
1,897,886