Web3 explorer & content creator !!π© AMB & KOL π 30+ Projectπͺ Open to collaborations & sponsored content !! TG π https://nitter.gq/t.co/TE44wJGaUn
South Asia
Joined March 2025
- Tweets201K
- Following7.4K
- Followers8.9K
- Likes46K
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
$REBATE launched with a fixed supply of 1,000,000,000.
Blockscout now reads 996,154,548.
Not a dead wallet, the tokens are gone from totalSupply.
Every trading fee on Rebate Pad buys $REBATE on the open market and burns 40% of it. 60 burns so far, 3.85M GONE.
That number only moves one way. β¬οΈ
robinhoodchain.blockscout.coβ¦
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
Hello gKaito community!
Quantum computing is moving forward, but researchers are also finding ways to make complex calculations require fewer resources.
Thatβs something @Starknet is paying attention to.
Its STARK proofs rely on hash-based cryptography rather than the elliptic-curve cryptography targeted by Shorβs algorithm.
But security is never a one-time job. As research advances, the plans to protect blockchain networks must advance too.
Preparing early is what matters.
quantum.starkware.co
π€ Paid partnership
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
CoconutBGaming going crazy over the insane multipliers and payouts on this slot. Duelbits 1.99 making every spin feel electric π₯ @duelbits
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
I submit content to campaigns all the time, and something always has to judge it. I used to treat that as small. Disagree with the score, revise, move on.
Then I read about Lee Castleton.
In 2004 a computer said he owed the Post Office Β£23,000. He did not. He could not afford a lawyer, and when the money ran out he defended himself. The costs against him reached around Β£321,000.
What stays with me is not only that the software was wrong. It is what it cost one person to question the record keeper.
AI agents will make millions of deals, and some will go wrong. @GenLayer's answer is many independent AI validators reviewing the evidence and reaching a verdict together, in minutes and at a fraction of a court's cost. It may not fix everything, but the price of asking is what I care about.
Have you ever dropped a dispute because fighting it cost more than winning was worth?
#JusticeNeedsAnUpgrade
Slow. Expensive. Wrong.
It's been this way for centuries. It doesn't have to be.
#JusticeNeedsAnUpgrade
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
Underrated line in the @meetmotes docs: ownership is not custody.
If a Mote's account holds funded positions, transferring the NFT can transfer effective control of them under some token-bound designs.
They say a settlement policy gets published before broad secondary use. Selling a funded Mote β selling an empty JPEG.
π€ Paid partnership Β· π€ Made with AI
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
November is here. Happy new month.
We are starting the month with fresh USDT bonus drops.
Check the image for your official codes, including exclusive reward tiers for our VIP players.
P.S. We also just launched a free Wcoin airdrop for ETH, BNB, and SOL holders.
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
I spent the last few weeks actually using @hoodminers_rh and then
decided to write down only what I saw happen inside my own wallet
The mint was free so I took mine and expected only a simple image
Then I learned every rig owns a real wallet and just sleeps until
it is switched on and that step burns 20000 MINR from your wallet for good so I paid it once just to see what my rig actually earns
That first epoch paid out in Bitcoin straight into the rig wallet
and that stays with the rig so a buyer inherits it if I ever sell
Later came merging and this was the part that changed my thinking
Two simple rigs merge into one stronger rig and the other is gone
forever and the cost is 100000 MINR burned for each rig destroyed
so the supply of 5000 can only go down and every rig matters more
Rarity sets your reward share across all nine levels starting low
at common and climbing to cosmic so it is not just decoration now
Two days back the team shipped Hood Launcher and creators keep 70 percent of fees and the liquidity has no withdraw function at all
I am staying in with my rigs and watching how the next epoch pays
because a free mint that earns Bitcoin and keeps on shrinking has
a real edge over the usual hyped launch that fades after two days
Check it yourself at hoodminer.live before you form your own view
@hoodminers_rh
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
Spicy noodles, cold drinks, and a quiet night on the streets
No rush, no stress. Just enjoying the moment
Life hits different when you slow downπ€
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
the next wave of web3 users might come from prediction markets.
as @OutcomeAhmed explains, itβs the simplicity that makes the difference.
anyone can understand a question, form an opinion, and take a position.
with 130M+ in all-time volume, @Outcomexyz is showing how
simple questions can open the door to onchain participation.
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
A Mote isnβt just for display itβs for "getting to work."
Most conversations about NFTs revolve around visuals, rarity, and price. But in exploring @meetmotes, I noticed something else: what a Mote actually represents well before you even get to AI trading, DeFi, or tokenomics.
The simplest way to break it down is through three interconnected components:
β’NFT: A unique, programmable identity.
β’AI Agent: A dedicated agent tied to that identity.
β’Smart Account: A separate account used to hold assets and execute actions within the parameters set by the owner.
Motes plans to launch approximately 20,000 NFTs on the Robinhood Chain, with each NFT corresponding to a specific agent identity and its own smart account.
Whatβs the difference?
A traditional PFP (profile picture) represents something you own and display. A Mote is designed to represent something you own that can also be put to work.
The artwork provides the identity, the agent provides the intelligence, and the smart account defines the boundaries within which that intelligence is permitted to operate.
Why are these boundaries important?
Think of it like giving your child a supplementary card with a spending limit, rather than handing over your primary card. They can still make purchases, but they cannot exceed the limits youβve set.
A smart account functions on a similar principle: owning an AI Agent doesnβt mean granting it unrestricted control over your funds.
A compelling premise
What I find fascinating isnβt just the idea of ββmaking NFTs more functional itβs the way it bridges digital ownership with programmable identity and controlled automation. @meetmotes
This is where my Motes journey begins.
One NFT. One dedicated agent. One smart account. A simple structure, yet it opens up greater possibilities.
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
I follow a few traders on X for their market takes.
Would I let every trade call they post turn into a real position on my account? That's a different question lol.
Which is why the Aspen campaign on @zerufinance caught my eye.
@useaspenai can turn trading signals from accounts you follow into automated Hyperliquid trades.
And there's a $50K competition running through Zaps around that activity.
Over 3,200 traders have already registered.
But the part I'd pay attention to isn't the prize banner.
It's the execution.
Following someone's opinion is free. Following it into a leveraged position involves actual money, fees and risk.
Zaps measures qualifying trading activity for the campaign, but earning points doesn't mean the underlying trade was profitable.
I'd test the strategy first, understand the risk limits and only then consider letting it trade live.
Pretty interesting combination of social signals, automated execution and onchain rewards.
Curious how many people would actually trust a trading account they follow enough to automate its calls.
π€ Paid partnership
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
Tried a small buy on a community token paired with ETH on @RebateLaunch.
The quote showed the base tokens plus the bonus rate before I confirmed. After the swap the total held was higher. Started slightly ahead of the pre-trade price after fees.
Holder payouts, where set, come in ETH instead of USDG. Still automatic, still no claim. The platform fee from that trade still feeds the same hook that buys and burns robinhood:0xb7ff57631b97000d950236ef63bd463da5beba7e.
Different pair, same locked rules. Watching whether ETH payouts change how long people actually hold compared with the USDG ones.
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
Gm
November 2 is the date to keep in mind if youβre participating in @quipnetwork quests and Mindshare.
Both wrap up at 13:00 UTC, and thatβs also when the final points distribution happens.
Thereβs still time to reveal a Quantum Echo too.
4,000 sponsored reveals are being refilled on November 1, while the account creation fee stays waived until November 8.
If youβve been putting off your quests, this is a good time to finish them.
Mainnet is getting closer, and the final stretch is here.
Create your account: account.quip.network
Reveal your Echo: echoes.quip.network
Whoβs still grinding before the deadline?
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
AI agents need reliable data from both digital and physical environments to become more useful.
Teneo is building a network that collects live information from the internet, while @vangrid_io focuses on capturing real world spatial data through everyday smartphones.
Bringing these two networks together creates a wider data foundation for autonomous agents, especially those expected to interact with physical environments.
The joint expeditions are a practical starting point for connecting both worlds.
Vangrid Γ @teneo_protocol
Teneo grids the internet. Vangrid grids the physical world.
Teneo turns civilian devices into nodes feeding the agent economy: public, social, live data.
Vangrid turns civilian pockets into nodes capturing the physical world: 3D spatial ground truth for embodied AI.
Digital + Physical. Two decentralized networks. One backbone for autonomous agents.
First move: joint expeditions.
We point the swarm at the physical world.
The grid is inevitable.
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
Good Morning fam
One thing I pay attention to when evaluating a launchpad is where the value goes after a token launches.
A successful launch shouldn't only benefit the person creating the token. Buyers, holders and the wider ecosystem should also have a reason to participate.
That's an interesting part of what @RebateLaunch is building with Rebate Pad.
Instead of treating every launch as a one-time event, it connects different activities through a shared economic model.
Think about three things:
β Buyers receive bonus tokens on qualifying purchases.
β Holders can receive payouts in the actual trading pair asset, without staking or manually claiming.
β Platform fees from launches feed into the $REBATE ecosystem through buybacks, burns and dip-buying mechanisms.
What makes this worth examining is how these incentives connect.
A new token launch can potentially contribute to the wider ecosystem rather than operating as an isolated event.
But the real test isn't how attractive the mechanics look on paper.
It's whether genuine creators arrive, buyers participate, trading activity grows and the reward system remains sustainable.
That's what I'll be watching as Rebate Pad develops.
Good tokenomics should be more than attractive numbers. They should create an ecosystem where every participant understands how value moves.
Curious to see how far this model can go.
$REBATE
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
Not every launchpad gives creators this kind of choice.
With @RebateLaunch, creators can decide who receives the trading fees: themselves or the token holders.
What makes this interesting is that the decision is visible from the start.
There are two possible directions:
* Creator-first: fees go to the creator.
* Holder-first: fees go to holders.
And there's an important detail. The change can only move in one direction. Fees can move from the creator to holders, but they cannot be taken back once holders become the recipients.
That means checking a token's launch settings can tell you something important about how its creator plans to handle fees.
People often focus on bonuses and rewards, but I think this setting deserves just as much attention.
With $REBATE, it's worth checking who receives the fees before deciding to participate.
Always DYOR.
ππ¬π₯π¨π¦ retweeted
Happy Sunday Vangrid Fam
robots don't just need intelligence; they need accurate information about the physical environments they're expected to navigate.
this is where @vangrid_io is taking an interesting direction.
Vangrid is making real-world spatial data accessible through an on-demand bounty system that can now be used by AI agents.
An agent can request a specific location, fund a bounty in USDC on Base or Arc, and have a nearby human contributor capture that environment using a smartphone. Once the submission is accepted, Vangrid reconstructs the footage into a 3D model that the requester can use.
This creates an interesting connection between autonomous software and human contributors. Agents can identify what data they need, commission its collection and pay for the result without requiring a traditional human-operated procurement process.
The bounty platform already shows over 1,000 requests and approximately $700K in settlements.
For Physical AI, this could become an important infrastructure layer: connecting AI agents to real-world environments through verifiable, human-collected spatial data.
@vangrid_io is making the physical world programmable, one capture at a time.
π€ Paid partnership
