I think losing ww2 gave us better chances of being a sovereign republic than getting absorbed prior. And Germany would probably intervene too, seeing it. Ideally Soviets would just not stab us in the back, even if it was in their interest to do so.

If we had, then there wouldn't be Poland and there wouldn't be Poles for long either. I think all things considered it was rather not that bad. I don't know if we wouldn't have a worse position if we had been taken over by Soviets in a pre ww2 alliance.

I think Poland had a good reason to be sceptical of Soviet "help". Let's not kid ourselves that this wouldn't be a massive risk of Soviets just taking Poland over as soon as they are allowed to march through. It was being stuck between a hammer and anvil.

Nie jest ofiarą tylko Ruskiem. Naturalnie propagowanie narratywy przychylnej Rosji jest w jego interesie. To o co bym go prosił to robić to rozważnie by obyło się bez konsekwencji dla niego. Szczególnie jeśli chce promować Unię Słowian.

This talk is kinda stupid and boring. Does each country have it's goyim? Yes. We are also tired of them, more than you because we have to deal with being attached to them while they attack not just Russia but spaz out on anyone. "Naród piękny ale ludzie kurwy"

Seems like a good reason for it.

Man... this is not a very good argumentation. Because it only pushes Poles towards German hands, it makes them think "I guess we should have actually sided with them to attack east if we still get accused despite clearly being fucked over". You're just making Poland Nazi.

I demand it be made public! Release the Sonreal (Word) files!

Khryushchev is literally the worst. He was installed by alliance of bureaucracy with army so that neither will have to work as Stalin forced them too, spiraling USSR into total bureaucratic stagnation and standstill. Brezhnev was a savior of White race. Stalin obv best.

Nie ma to jak 1sza Socjalna Republika obojga narodów! Niech żyje Sarmato-faszyzm!

USSR had a state capitalist model, and China has corporatist. But the supremacy of the people through party makes it possible, because it isn't equal partnership, capital is enslaved with no chance for retaliation. Bolshevism failed in Italy because it was headless as it is now.

Fascism ended in a failure because it didn't carry out a total revolution. By preserving bourgeois elements, they betrayed Duce and Italy, stabbing them in the back and welcoming invaders. Fascism is just shy of success that is communism. Look at victorious USSR or China.

Nie jestem lewica, tylko komunista. No ale tak, to właśnie usiłuję zrobić. Z resztą nie tylko lewacy ale i liberałowie i znaczna część pospólstwa ma ten groźny pogląd. Ja wybiję im ten pomysł z głowy.

The 1968 expulsion of Jews from Poland? I agree! Thankfully we had communista here fighting against leftists. Today sadly the two are conflated and we are plagued by leftists.

Heidegger spoke of this. Brilliant Marxist.

Yes, it's not about the devotion, that's not what I require or need of them. The point is to create a structure which can provide him with the nescessary information, or at least use it for him. I don't want to let other's make mistakes costly for us all.

De Gaulle-Maoisme? Because that's who I was paraphrasing.

I don't see what you mean. But lets say you're cold so you make some fire, but problem is you are on a wooden boat with others. Sure, you will be warm, but you'll sink everyone including you. So it would be better for you to have immediate discomfort but everyone gets to float