Seems like summer is a good time to stop teaching and start writing up the research. Thanks for giving Refereed a try!
We have added the long-awaited Outline / Table Of Contents panel, which simplifies navigation in long papers. 👍
We have launched the new website showcasing some of the features of our word editor. Now you can also demo Refereed without registration. Check it out and let us know what you think. 👇 #ScienceTwitter #AcWri
bit.ly/3culSPk
It is important for us to know how do we proceed with Refereed. Based on the customer feedback we have made a short one-page anonymous survey. It will take no more than 1 or 2 minutes. We will be very thankful if you put your ticks there. THANK YOU!!! surveymonkey.com/r/RK7NK25
Refereed retweeted
A complete list of things that cannot be published as a preprint:
1. Nothing
Pretty nervous about sharing my FIRST single author paper (still a preprint). Comments welcome
Link: osf.io/msfkb/
In our #SciWr editor, we are implementing not only technology best practices. We also address to the research in order to make the process of writing and reading better. The firm left alignment in our editor is used on purpose - it is healthier for your eyes to read. Agree?
We have launched the app for scientific writing. You can collab in real-time, export to LaTeX, PDF, or directly to @overleaf in one click! NO need to format or code!
Next: version control and integration with preprint servers. A FREE extended TRIAL for those registered by 01/2021
Today we had a one-on-one demo with @ScroogeMarketer. Thank you, Tausif, for the great suggestions in making @RefereedHQ a better tool for scientific writing and publishing. 👍
Should we make #PeerReview optional? So that you could choose to publish on #preprint servers only. And also allow open #PeerReview for such papers after publication and subsequently corrections by the authors. Your opinion? #acwri #openscience
"The idea that journals have a special way to tell what’s good science and what’s bad has always been an illusion." Lots of valid points on #PeerReview and #scientificpublishing are discussed in this article. 👇
wired.com/story/peer-reviewe…
Refereed retweeted
Check out our updated website refereed.com/! We have added FAQ and more details about what we do and who we are.
Check out our updated website refereed.com/! We have added FAQ and more details about what we do and who we are.
We have implemented dynamic references in our editor. Now you can refer to figures, equations, tables, and listings. Our editor will take care of the correct numbering of references in your #researchpaper. Check it out and help us test it!
youtube.com/watch?v=o0ujoZpQ…
We are in Alpha yet but we carry on 1-on-1 demos of our editor. Comment or DM so that we could connect and come up with new ideas. Every researcher we demoed with so far brought absolutely crucial advice, which we greatly appreciate! It would be supercool to know your opinion!
Refereed retweeted
During the last two-week sprint, we worked hard to bring dynamic references to our editor, so that you could refer to figures, equations, and tables without warring about numbering. We'll show the demo soon! And of course, you'll be able to try it out yourself. 😊
During the last two-week sprint, we worked hard to bring dynamic references to our editor, so that you could refer to figures, equations, and tables without warring about numbering. We'll show the demo soon! And of course, you'll be able to try it out yourself. 😊
So that's gonna be export to #LaTeX and #preprint servers!🤘We will start negotiating with *rXiv representatives shortly. 😉
Before the full launch of the peer review functionality, we want our writing app to bring as much value to you as possible. What would be the most beneficial feature for you? #openscience #openaccess #acwri
40%Export to LaTeX/Overleaf
20%Export to DocX/Word
40%Export to preprint server
0%Other (comment below)
5 votes • Final results Refereed retweeted
Thanks for inviting @RefereedHQ and myself for the discussion!
Replying to @dhimmel
The recording from our #openpublish fest session on GitHub-based publishing is available at youtu.be/UTepYeOpFrk.
Thanks to all the participants including audience members and @VinceRubinetti for editing the video to help with sound artifacts.
Before the full launch of the peer review functionality, we want our writing app to bring as much value to you as possible. What would be the most beneficial feature for you? #openscience #openaccess #acwri
40%Export to LaTeX/Overleaf
20%Export to DocX/Word
40%Export to preprint server
0%Other (comment below)
5 votes • Final resultsWill the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing? nature.com/articles/d41586-0…












