Two fake right house eunuchs shooting the breeze about how they accidentally let in millions of third worlders who cost us money in every measurable way while also vandalising the demography of this island that had been consistent for over a millennium (not that they lose a wink of sleep over that part).
Meanwhile they fire off all the invective their poncy milksop lily-livered ivory tower brainoids can come up with against those of us who want to correct their errors, while they live isolated lives of privilege and comfort and never have to be inconvenienced by the consequences of what they have done โ that's for the plebs to suffer.
If they had an ounce of shame, self-awareness or honesty, they would spend the rest of their lives in sackcloth and ashes, pleading for the forgiveness of the English.
Jacob Rees-Mogg says that the Boriswave of 1 million is a 'drop in the ocean' compared to EU migration.
He ignores that the Boriswave was net 2.5 million from 2021 to 2024, not 1 million. This consists of a net gain of 3 million non-EU nationals, net loss of 371,000 British nationals and a net loss of 110,000 EU nationals.
He also says that the borders were opened up because they thought 'British people didn't want to work anymore' after Covid and that the UK needed a 'large number of immigrants to keep the economy going' and that this turned out to be 'wrong' as we now have 9 million economically inactive adults.
I wonder if the two might go hand and hand.
Anyway, at least they've stopped arguing the Boriswave was mainly Ukrainians and Hong Kongers.
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
Worth remembering the care visa was meant to fill somewhere between 6,000 and 40,000 jobs. 616,000 people came, and over half weren't even care workers
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
Replying to @RestorerRB
They do not realise the own goals that they cannot stop hitting in
They look ridiculous, they sound ridiculous and in turn harm the party they claim to represent
Im actually surprised that a party wide communication hasn't gone out to tell them all to stop and grow up
But let them cook i guess
Why do Reform shills all do this thing of misspelling Rupert like it's being said in a babyish voice. The only person who I can picture saying it like 'Woopert' or whatever is when Alex Phillips is slagging him off on one of her deranged rants.
I suspect one of them said it that way once with an actual meaning behind it, but because they are largely unintelligent and uncreative people, they all started copying it from each other assuming it must be funny and clever for some reason, even if they don't know what it is.
Libtards who have decided that Star Trek's Federation actually represents an achievable ideal and righties who take against it for the same reason I believe both get in a twist about something minor.
It's just the *setting* for stories to take place. That's it. Many excellent stories are told, and many of those stories don't have much to do with the luxury space communism fantasy anyway. It just provides a basis from which the show proceeds: all our problems at home are solved, now how do we engage with the wider galaxy. The way that idealistic utopia operates doesn't bear much scrutiny, but it isn't the point of the show.
As, at its core, the show is about military professionals working together to a high standard, with themes of duty and loyalty, it also has great conservative appeal. This is (one reason among many) why later Cursedman-era Trek is so dismal; it's obsessed with pushing its diversity gay queer neurodivergent heckin' Redditism. If Trek was always left wing in the way they want it to be, it's funny how none of that was ever in the show before.
If you want a good example of the values Star Trek actually promoted, it's not in the airy-fairy vague economic idealism that the Federation is once or twice referenced as operating by but seldom actually goes into any detail about. It's in a scene like this. Two men (in this case, neither are human) resolving a dispute with immense dignity and professionalism, while in the process there comes a sad recognition that they have been at odds and that their friendship may be damaged by it, followed by a mutual commitment not to let that happen. That's the show I love.
youtube.com/watch?v=HKII3sFUโฆ
NOTE: I'm a fan of Star Trek, not a "hater." But I'm a tempered fan.
The show is a philosophical mess. Oh yes, its values are progressive, which is why it's incoherent--that's what progressive values are.
1. It pretends there's no such thing as money or currency. Never explains it. Pretends human nature changed and people just "do the right thing" with no commensurate reward.
2. Runs a military organization with a hierarchy, but pretends that it hates battleships and war. Pretends these things can be managed away if everyone would just Federation harder.
3. They wouldn't give up the Federation hierarchy any more than Marxists will give up their penthouse so that the poor they claim to care about are equal.
4. Puts 1,000 people and families on a warship, puts that ship in danger, then the crew insist on prioritizing the safety of nanites that are destroying the ship over the preservation of their own people and families.
5. Consistently places the sensible, cautious, and sometimes militaristic points of view concerned with survival in the mouths of what we would call "Maga-coded" caricatures today.
Even when the "Maga" character is right, and the Captain has to do what he suggests to save the ship, the smug crew and writers still mock him and act superior.
It's a great show. It's also a ridiculous, infantile, leftist liberal cream-jeans fantasy.
Gene Roddenberry and the main production crew for decades are liberal man children.
-Uncle Josh
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
I'm fine with reparations.
Its morally right we pay the cost of returning people to Africa and undoing this historical injustice.
Having just left Elmina Castle in Ghana, where enslaved Africans were imprisoned before being shipped across the Atlantic, I think Europeans should never tire of acknowledging the horrors of our shared history and asking forgiveness from our African friends.
Britain played its own shameful part in that history.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Elmina Castle was built by the Portuguese in 1482, seized by the Dutch in 1637 and acquired by Britain only in 1872โafter Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807. Africans captured in wars and raids supplied most enslaved people sold to Europeans at such coastal forts.
britannica.com/place/Elmina-Cโฆ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmina_Caโฆ
britannica.com/topic/transatlโฆ
rmg.co.uk/stories/maritiโฆ
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
The complete lack of self awareness is remarkable.
Vote Restore and get a party that is literally standing ex-Tories at the next general election, has disgraced Tories like Scott Benton campaigning for it, is led by a guy who openly says he is talking with Kemi, and senior activists like Charlie Downes who tried to join the Tories after the Boriswave? Is that right? Did I miss something?
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
Here's an astonishing stat: Just over half of all visas granted to care workers in 2023 were sponsored by employers that have since lost their licences, mostly due to fraud or abuse. Thatโs ~200,000 people once you include dependants. None of them have had their visas revoked.
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
Goodwin here assumes that what matters is the view of the complacent majority, not the committed minority. He also assumes that what matters are the religiously lukewarm, not the religiously fanatical. Both these assumptions are incorrect, and reflect a modern bias.
Europe was elevated by Christian saints and martyrs, whose beliefs diffused through the population. They were a tiny minority. They shaped the majority and created high trust societies.
Islam went through a very different process. The fanatical minority crushed the aspirations of highly educated Muslim minority, killed off the relationship between Islam and philosophy, and created the dogmatically rigid, politically flexible behemoth you see today.
The whole of entertainment, where it has ever had detectable political messaging, has long been geared toward the left. Not only can gormless libtards get by thinking that anything less than absolute agreement with their worldview is a cause for seething hatred, but the monolithic nature of media not only never challenges them, but in effect funnels them into this way of thinking.
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
For a cohort of well-intentioned liberals their actual ideology โin their headsโ is something closer to a utopian โStar Trek Liberalismโ vision rather than what you often see when the ideas are put into practice. Itโs a compelling vision, easy to see why people are attached to it
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
'He is the perfect example of someone who has integrated perfectly into the part of our society that is multicultural'
Yeah, he really is the perfect example:
Uniting the right means delusionally hoping hundreds of thousands of people will all agree to switch their vote to a party who insists it has a divine right to their support no matter how insulting it is to them?
I think you're brighter than that, if only because by now that strategy's been tried to death, Matt. By-election after by-election the same complaining about splitting the vote and letting in the left happens and yet Restore are still here and not at all diminished by it.
Which do you think is more simple and plausible: getting every Restore supporter to abandon the party they actually want en masse, or getting Nigel to swallow his pride and pick up the phone? You can do the endless ineffectual philosophising on X about if only everyone in Restore would change their minds or you can call for the action by one man which might actually sort the situation out. It just takes some courage.
Replying to @RestorerRB
Uniting the right means consolidating around the only anti-establishment party that can actually win a general election. Thatโs Reform.
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
โDeportations? Restore Britain? Something about an oak door? Anakin, youโre breaking my heart! Youโre going down a path my friends wonโt let me follow!โ
Another round of Reform shills all repeating the same line as usual this morning, as though someone somewhere might be convinced by the 50th time of hearing it. Embarrassing.
There are many obvious issues with Boris Johnson which on our side we understand. Most egregious is that, between the Boriswave and intervening to keep the war in Ukraine going, he's contributed to the destruction of two separate European ethnicities, which is enough to make him a monster of the highest order.
However, were Reform not talking at one point about there being consequences for politicians who were in power and were responsible for these things? They have certainly talked about prosecuting civil servants. Johnson would surely be guiltier than anyone. And yet here we have a Reform MP refusing to back down from calling Boris a hero. There is no consistency or coordination among them. An outfit lacking in professionalism and credibility.
The Restorer ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
This is an amazing clip. The terror once she realizes she was live.
It took the man passing for me to realise that Captain Picard has been such a big cultural presence for all my lifetime, and I think it is to our great benefit that a Shakespearean Englishman achieved that status playing a wise and calm character at the top of a major franchise. As a child you don't think about it, but when I watch Patrick Stewart in that role now I see how he really was a first rate actor, giving that material believability and often a subtle depth. He was also great as Sejanus in I, Claudius.
As with most celebs, if you go looking you'll find plenty of libtardery from him politically, though to his credit I remember him briefly being the only famous person who said anything other than Christian bakeries should be forced by law to bake gay cakes when a caae about that came up in Northern Ireland.
Rest in peace, Sir Patrick. Whether you meant to be or not, you were a great credit to England. Even though the character was supposed to be French!









































